Question 340 of 520
Network SecurityhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

N10-009 Network Security Practice Question

This N10-009 practice question tests your understanding of network security. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

During a security audit, a consultant discovers that encrypted traffic between a client and a web server is being decrypted and re-encrypted by an intermediate device on the network path. Which type of attack best describes this scenario?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "best"

    Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Man-in-the-middle

Option C is correct because the scenario describes a classic man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack where an intermediary intercepts, decrypts, and re-encrypts traffic between the client and server. This allows the attacker to read or modify the data while both endpoints believe they have a secure TLS session. The key indicator is the decryption and re-encryption step, which is the hallmark of an active MITM proxy.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ARP poisoning

    Why it's wrong here

    ARP poisoning is a method used to redirect traffic to an attacker's machine, but it is not the attack itself. The described behavior (decrypting and re-encrypting) is MITM.

    When this WOULD be correct

    ARP poisoning would be correct in a scenario where an attacker sends forged ARP messages to associate their MAC address with the IP address of a legitimate device, causing traffic to be redirected to the attacker without any decryption or re-encryption, such as in a simple traffic interception or denial-of-service attack.

  • SSL stripping

    Why it's wrong here

    SSL stripping downgrades a secure HTTPS connection to insecure HTTP. The scenario involves decrypting and re-encrypting, not downgrading, so it is more accurately an MITM using a proxy.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A question describing an attack where a proxy modifies HTTPS links to HTTP in transit, causing the client to communicate over unencrypted HTTP while the proxy maintains HTTPS with the server, would make SSL stripping the correct answer.

  • Man-in-the-middle

    Why this is correct

    An MITM attack intercepts traffic between two endpoints, often using a proxy to decrypt and re-encrypt, allowing the attacker to read or modify the data without the parties realizing.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Rogue DHCP

    Why it's wrong here

    A rogue DHCP server assigns incorrect IP configurations, potentially redirecting traffic, but it does not involve decrypting and re-encrypting TLS traffic directly.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A question describing a user receiving an incorrect default gateway or DNS server from a DHCP server, leading to traffic being redirected to a malicious host, would make rogue DHCP the correct answer.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The N10-009 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Man-in-the-middleCorrect answer

Why this is correct

An MITM attack intercepts traffic between two endpoints, often using a proxy to decrypt and re-encrypt, allowing the attacker to read or modify the data without the parties realizing.

ARP poisoningWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

ARP poisoning involves manipulating ARP tables to intercept traffic at layer 2, but it does not inherently decrypt and re-encrypt encrypted traffic; it only redirects traffic. The scenario describes decryption and re-encryption, which is characteristic of a man-in-the-middle attack, not ARP poisoning alone.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

ARP poisoning would be correct in a scenario where an attacker sends forged ARP messages to associate their MAC address with the IP address of a legitimate device, causing traffic to be redirected to the attacker without any decryption or re-encryption, such as in a simple traffic interception or denial-of-service attack.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse ARP poisoning with man-in-the-middle because ARP poisoning is a common technique used to facilitate MITM attacks at the local network level, leading them to select it as the attack type rather than the overarching concept.

SSL strippingWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

SSL stripping downgrades HTTPS to HTTP, but the scenario describes decryption and re-encryption of encrypted traffic, which is characteristic of a man-in-the-middle attack, not SSL stripping.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A question describing an attack where a proxy modifies HTTPS links to HTTP in transit, causing the client to communicate over unencrypted HTTP while the proxy maintains HTTPS with the server, would make SSL stripping the correct answer.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates confuse SSL stripping with any attack that intercepts encrypted traffic, but SSL stripping specifically downgrades the protocol, not just decrypts and re-encrypts.

Rogue DHCPWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Rogue DHCP involves an unauthorized DHCP server assigning IP configurations, not intercepting and re-encrypting traffic. The scenario describes decryption and re-encryption, which is a man-in-the-middle attack, not DHCP-related.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A question describing a user receiving an incorrect default gateway or DNS server from a DHCP server, leading to traffic being redirected to a malicious host, would make rogue DHCP the correct answer.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse rogue DHCP with man-in-the-middle because both involve intercepting traffic, but rogue DHCP specifically exploits DHCP to redirect traffic, not to decrypt/re-encrypt it.

Analysis generated from the official N10-009blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse the method (e.g., ARP poisoning) with the attack type (MITM), or they mistake SSL stripping for any interception of encrypted traffic, not realizing that SSL stripping removes encryption entirely rather than re-encrypting it.

Trap categories for this question

  • Scenario analysis trap

    SSL stripping downgrades a secure HTTPS connection to insecure HTTP. The scenario involves decrypting and re-encrypting, not downgrading, so it is more accurately an MITM using a proxy.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

In a MITM attack against TLS, the attacker typically presents a self-signed or forged certificate to the client, while establishing a separate TLS session with the server. This requires the client to trust the attacker's certificate, often achieved via a compromised CA or local trust store. In real-world scenarios, such as corporate SSL inspection, this same decryption/re-encryption process is used legitimately, but without authorization it constitutes an attack.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the N10-009 exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related N10-009 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free N10-009 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this N10-009 question test?

Network Security — This question tests Network Security — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Man-in-the-middle — Option C is correct because the scenario describes a classic man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack where an intermediary intercepts, decrypts, and re-encrypts traffic between the client and server. This allows the attacker to read or modify the data while both endpoints believe they have a secure TLS session. The key indicator is the decryption and re-encryption step, which is the hallmark of an active MITM proxy.

What should I do if I get this N10-009 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "best". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More N10-009 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This N10-009 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the N10-009 exam.