Courseiva
Networking ConceptshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

N10-009 Networking Concepts Practice Question

A network engineer is designing a new IPv6 addressing scheme. The company has been assigned a /48 prefix and needs to support up to 250 subnets. Which subnet size should be used to minimize waste while meeting the requirement?

⚠ Common exam trap

The N10-009 exam often tests the misconception that /64 is the only valid subnet size in IPv6, but the question asks for subnet size to minimize waste for subnets, not for SLAAC, so candidates incorrectly choose /64 without considering the requirement for only 250 subnets.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

/56

A /56 subnet provides 256 subnets (2^(56-48) = 2^8 = 256), which meets the requirement of up to 250 subnets with minimal waste. A /48 prefix is the site-level allocation, and using a /56 subnet mask leaves 8 bits for subnetting, offering exactly the needed capacity without over-allocating address space.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • /52

    Why it's wrong here

    Selecting a /52 prefix for subnetting from a /48 global routing prefix allocates only 4 bits for subnet identification (52 - 48 = 4). This results in 2^4, or 16, available subnets. This quantity is significantly less than the required 250 subnets, rendering /52 an inadequate choice for the specified network design.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the requirement were to support up to 16 subnets, a /52 would be the correct choice to minimize waste.

  • /56

    Why this is correct

    A /48 global routing prefix is typically assigned to an organization. To create 250 subnets, additional bits beyond the /48 must be used for subnetting. A /56 prefix length means 8 bits are available for subnetting (56 - 48 = 8). This yields 2^8, or 256, possible subnets, which perfectly accommodates the requirement for 250 subnets with minimal address space waste.

  • /64

    Why it's wrong here

    A /64 prefix uses 16 bits for subnetting (48+16=64), providing 65,536 subnets. While it works, it wastes many subnet IDs and is not minimal for 250 subnets. Also, /64 is typically used for end-user subnets, not as a subnetting strategy from a /48.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the question required each subnet to support SLAAC (Stateless Address Autoconfiguration) or needed a standard subnet size for end-user networks, /64 is the correct choice because IPv6 standards mandate /64 for SLAAC.

  • /60

    Why it's wrong here

    Utilizing a /60 prefix for subnetting from a /48 global routing prefix dedicates 12 bits for subnet identification (60 - 48 = 12). This provides 2^12, or 4,096, distinct subnets. While this technically satisfies the requirement for 250 subnets, it represents a substantial over-allocation and inefficient use of the available address space, making it a less optimal choice compared to a /56.

    When this WOULD be correct

    If the requirement were to support up to 4000 subnets, a /60 would be correct because it provides 4096 subnets, meeting the need with minimal waste compared to larger subnet sizes like /64.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The N10-009 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

/56Correct answer

Why this is correct

A /48 global routing prefix is typically assigned to an organization. To create 250 subnets, additional bits beyond the /48 must be used for subnetting. A /56 prefix length means 8 bits are available for subnetting (56 - 48 = 8). This yields 2^8, or 256, possible subnets, which perfectly accommodates the requirement for 250 subnets with minimal address space waste.

/52Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A /52 prefix provides 16 subnets (2^(52-48)=16), which is insufficient for the requirement of up to 250 subnets.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the requirement were to support up to 16 subnets, a /52 would be the correct choice to minimize waste.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may mistakenly think that a /52 offers more subnets than a /56 because it has a larger subnet portion, but they forget that the number of subnets is 2^(subnet bits), and /52 gives only 16 subnets, far fewer than needed.

/64Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A /64 subnet provides 2^64 addresses per subnet, which is far more than needed for 250 subnets. Using /64 would waste a huge number of addresses and does not minimize waste given the /48 prefix.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the question required each subnet to support SLAAC (Stateless Address Autoconfiguration) or needed a standard subnet size for end-user networks, /64 is the correct choice because IPv6 standards mandate /64 for SLAAC.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates often default to /64 because it is the most common IPv6 subnet size and is required for SLAAC, forgetting that the question emphasizes minimizing waste for a specific number of subnets.

/60Wrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A /60 subnet provides only 2^(60-48)=4096 subnets, which is far more than the required 250, but it wastes more addresses than a /56 (which gives 256 subnets). The question asks to minimize waste, so /56 is optimal.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

If the requirement were to support up to 4000 subnets, a /60 would be correct because it provides 4096 subnets, meeting the need with minimal waste compared to larger subnet sizes like /64.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may think a larger subnet prefix (like /60) is more efficient because it provides more subnets, but they overlook that the requirement is only 250 subnets, so a /56 wastes fewer addresses overall.

Analysis generated from the official N10-009blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Visual reference

192.168.1.0 /24 256 addresses (254 usable) 192.168.1.0 /25 Subnet A 128 addr (126 usable) 192.168.1.128 /25 Subnet B 128 addr (126 usable) Borrowing 1 bit from host portion creates 2 subnets (/25)

About these practice questions

One of 464 original N10-009 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This N10-009 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the N10-009 exam.