Question 188 of 2,152
Route Maps and Route FilteringmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is that the prefix 192.168.100.0/24 is denied because the BGP update carries the no-export community, and an inbound route-map or filter on the router is configured to reject routes with that community. This occurs because the no-export community is a well-known BGP community that tells the receiving router not to advertise the prefix to any eBGP peers; however, in this debug output, the router itself is denying the update upon receipt, meaning a local policy explicitly blocks routes tagged with no-export. On the Cisco CCNP ENARSI 300-410 exam, this scenario tests your ability to interpret debug ip bgp updates output and understand how community-based filtering works—a common trap is confusing the no-export community’s propagation restriction with an inbound denial, which is actually caused by a configured filter. Remember the memory tip: “no-export stops the export, but a filter stops the import.”

300-410 Route Maps and Route Filtering Practice Question

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of route maps and route filtering. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A network engineer runs the following command to troubleshoot a route filtering issue:

R1# debug ip bgp updates

BGP(0): 10.1.1.2 rcvd UPDATE w/ attr: nexthop 10.1.1.2, origin i, metric 0, path 65001 65002 BGP(0): 10.1.1.2 rcvd UPDATE about 192.168.100.0/24 -- DENIED due to: community no-export;

What does this output indicate?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Open the full BGP breakdown →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The prefix 192.168.100.0/24 is denied because of the no-export community.

The debug output shows that BGP received an update for prefix 192.168.100.0/24 from neighbor 10.1.1.2, but the update was denied because the prefix has the community 'no-export'. This indicates that an inbound route-map or filter is configured to deny routes with the no-export community.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The prefix 192.168.100.0/24 is being accepted and installed in the BGP table.

    Why it's wrong here

    The output clearly states 'DENIED due to: community no-export', so the route is not accepted.

  • The prefix 192.168.100.0/24 is denied because of the no-export community.

    Why this is correct

    The debug output explicitly shows that the update is denied due to the no-export community.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • The prefix 192.168.100.0/24 is denied because of an AS_PATH filter.

    Why it's wrong here

    The denial reason is community no-export, not AS_PATH.

  • The prefix 192.168.100.0/24 is accepted but not advertised to any neighbor.

    Why it's wrong here

    The route is denied and not installed in the BGP table.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    The output clearly states 'DENIED due to: community no-export', so the route is not accepted.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

Route Maps and Route Filtering — This question tests Route Maps and Route Filtering — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The prefix 192.168.100.0/24 is denied because of the no-export community. — The debug output shows that BGP received an update for prefix 192.168.100.0/24 from neighbor 10.1.1.2, but the update was denied because the prefix has the community 'no-export'. This indicates that an inbound route-map or filter is configured to deny routes with the no-export community.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on 300-410

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A network engineer runs the following command to verify BGP route filtering: R1# show bgp ipv4 unicast 192.168.1.0/24 BGP routing table entry for 192.168.1.0/24, version 2 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default) Advertised to update-groups: 1 Refresh Epoch 1 Local, (received & used) 10.1.1.2 (metric 20) from 10.1.1.2 (2.2.2.2) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best rx pathid: 0, tx pathid: 0x0 Community: no-export What does the 'Community: no-export' indicate?

easy
  • A.The route will not be advertised to any iBGP peers.
  • B.The route will not be advertised to any eBGP peers.
  • C.The route is filtered by an inbound route-map.
  • D.The route is not installed in the routing table.

Why B: The community 'no-export' indicates that this route should not be advertised to any eBGP peers. This is a well-known community that controls route propagation.

Keep practising

More 300-410 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 18, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.