Which TWO statements are true about OSPFv2 neighbor adjacency, network statements, and passive interfaces?
The passive-interface command disables Hello transmission on an interface, so no OSPF neighbor can ever be discovered or formed on that segment. However, OSPF's SPF calculation still requires the connected subnet to be known, so the router advertises that network as a stub (Type 1 LSA) within its area. This ensures that remote routers have a route to the subnet, even though no neighbor adjacency exists on the passive interface.
Why this answer
Configuring an interface as passive in OSPFv2 prevents the router from sending Hello packets out of that interface, which stops neighbor discovery and adjacency formation. However, OSPF still includes the connected network of that passive interface in its Type 1 Router LSAs, allowing the network to be advertised to other OSPF routers.
Exam trap
Cisco often tests the misconception that a passive interface stops network advertisement, when in fact it only stops Hello packets and adjacency formation while still advertising the connected network in LSAs.
Why the other options are wrong
A wildcard mask of 0.0.0.0 only matches one exact IP address. It does not impose any restriction on adjacency.
Passive interfaces still advertise their networks—they just do not send or receive Hello packets. Only adjacency is suppressed.
The network command matches multiple interfaces; OSPF then tries to form adjacencies on every enabled interface, regardless of IP address order.