hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

Exhibit

Current state:
R1 priority 1 - DR
R2 priority 1 - BDR
R3 priority changed from 1 to 200 after adjacency formed

Exhibit: On a broadcast multiaccess segment, R3 should become the OSPF DR, but it is staying DROTHER. Which explanation best fits OSPF behavior?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Exhibit: On a broadcast multiaccess segment, R3 should become the OSPF DR, but it is staying DROTHER. Which explanation best fits OSPF behavior?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

DR election is nonpreemptive on broadcast networks

Changing priority later does not automatically replace the existing DR.

B

Distractor review

A router cannot become DR if it uses a loopback router ID

A loopback-based router ID is normal.

C

Distractor review

OSPF priority works only on point-to-point links

Priority matters on broadcast and NBMA segments, not point-to-point.

D

Distractor review

R3 must use area 1 to become DR

Area ID is unrelated to which router becomes DR on that segment.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

A common exam trap is assuming that increasing a router's OSPF priority after the DR election will cause it to immediately become the new DR. Many candidates mistakenly believe OSPF DR election is preemptive and that the router with the highest priority always becomes DR instantly. However, OSPF DR election on broadcast networks is nonpreemptive, meaning the current DR remains until it fails or OSPF adjacency resets. This misunderstanding can lead to incorrect answers about why a router with a higher priority remains DROTHER, as in the case of R3 in the question.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) is a link-state routing protocol that uses a designated router (DR) and backup designated router (BDR) election process on broadcast multiaccess networks to reduce the amount of OSPF routing update traffic. The DR acts as a central point for exchanging OSPF LSAs (Link State Advertisements) among routers on the same segment, improving efficiency and scalability. Routers on the segment elect the DR and BDR based primarily on OSPF priority values and router IDs. The OSPF DR election process on broadcast networks is nonpreemptive, meaning once a DR is elected, it remains the DR until it goes down or OSPF adjacency resets occur. Even if another router later has a higher priority or a higher router ID, it will not replace the current DR. This behavior prevents constant DR changes and network instability. The election uses priority as the first criterion, and if priorities tie, the highest router ID is used as a tiebreaker. A common exam trap is assuming that changing a router's OSPF priority dynamically will cause an immediate DR re-election. In reality, the existing DR remains in place until it fails or OSPF is reset on the segment. This nonpreemptive behavior means that a router like R3, despite having a higher priority, stays DROTHER if the current DR is still active. Understanding this helps network engineers predict OSPF behavior and avoid misconfigurations or false assumptions about DR roles during troubleshooting.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF elects a Designated Router (DR) and Backup Designated Router (BDR) on broadcast multiaccess networks to optimize routing update exchanges.
  • The OSPF DR election process uses router priority as the primary factor and router ID as a tiebreaker when priorities are equal.
  • Once elected, the OSPF DR remains the DR until it goes down or OSPF adjacency resets, because the election process is nonpreemptive.
  • Changing a router's OSPF priority after DR election does not trigger a new election or replace the current DR automatically.
  • Routers with loopback-based router IDs can become DRs; the router ID type does not prevent DR election.
  • OSPF priority values are relevant only on broadcast and NBMA networks, not on point-to-point links where DR election does not occur.
  • The OSPF area ID does not influence which router becomes DR on a broadcast segment; DR election is local to the segment.
  • Understanding OSPF DR election nonpreemptive behavior helps avoid misinterpretation of router roles during network troubleshooting.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Related practice questions

Related 200-301 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 200-301 question test?

OSPF elects a Designated Router (DR) and Backup Designated Router (BDR) on broadcast multiaccess networks to optimize routing update exchanges.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: DR election is nonpreemptive on broadcast networks — On broadcast networks, OSPF DR and BDR election is not preemptive. If a DR is already elected, giving another router a higher priority later does not force a new election unless the current DR goes down or OSPF is reset on the segment.

What should I do if I get this 200-301 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.