Drag steps to the numbered slots on the right, or tap a step then tap a slot.
CCNA IP Routing Practice Question
Drag and drop the following OSPFv2 neighbor state transitions into the correct order, starting from the initial state when no neighbor information has been received.
⚠ Common exam trap
Do not confuse the order of ExStart and Exchange; ExStart always precedes Exchange. Also, remember that 2-Way comes after Init, not before.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Down, Init, 2-Way, ExStart, Exchange
OSPF neighbor states begin at Down, then Init after receiving Hello, 2-Way after seeing own router ID, ExStart for master/slave negotiation, and Exchange for exchanging database descriptors.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✓
Down, Init, 2-Way, ExStart, Exchange
Why this is correct
This is the correct OSPF neighbor state progression. Down is the initial state with no Hello received; Init is entered after receiving a Hello but without seeing itself in it; 2-Way confirms bidirectional communication when the router sees its own Router ID in the neighbor's Hello; ExStart performs master/slave election and initial DBD sequence number negotiation; Exchange then transfers Database Description packets. This order ensures that bidirectional reachability is established before any adjacency negotiation begins.
- ✗
Down, 2-Way, Init, ExStart, Exchange
Why it's wrong here
This is incorrect because it places 2-Way before Init, which is logically impossible: a router cannot reach the bidirectional 2-Way state before it has even received a Hello (Init). The Init state is triggered by the first received Hello, while 2-Way requires the router to see its own Router ID in a subsequent Hello from the neighbor, confirming that communication is bidirectional. Additionally, moving ExStart immediately after Init skips the mandatory 2-Way confirmation that must precede master/slave election.
- ✗
Down, Init, ExStart, 2-Way, Exchange
Why it's wrong here
This is wrong because ExStart is sequenced too early, before the 2-Way state. ExStart is the master/slave election and DBD sequence number negotiation, which should only begin after 2-Way has confirmed that both routers can see each other in Hello packets; without that bidirectional confirmation, there is no verified path for DBD exchange. The correct order is Down → Init → 2-Way → ExStart → Exchange, so placing ExStart before 2-Way violates the protocol's dependency between adjacency establishment and DBD synchronization.
- ✗
Down, Init, 2-Way, Exchange, ExStart
Why it's wrong here
This is wrong because Exchange is placed before ExStart, but ExStart must complete first. During ExStart, the routers elect a master and slave and agree on the initial DBD sequence numbers; the Exchange state then uses those negotiated parameters to send and acknowledge Database Description packets. Without the ExStart negotiation, routers would not know who controls the sequence numbering, making DBD exchange unreliable and potentially out of sync.
Option-by-option analysis
Why each answer is right or wrong
Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The 200-301 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.
✓Down, Init, 2-Way, ExStart, ExchangeCorrect answer▾
Why this is correct
This is the correct OSPF neighbor state progression. Down is the initial state with no Hello received; Init is entered after receiving a Hello but without seeing itself in it; 2-Way confirms bidirectional communication when the router sees its own Router ID in the neighbor's Hello; ExStart performs master/slave election and initial DBD sequence number negotiation; Exchange then transfers Database Description packets. This order ensures that bidirectional reachability is established before any adjacency negotiation begins.
✗Down, 2-Way, Init, ExStart, ExchangeWrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
The order incorrectly places 2-Way before Init, violating the OSPF state machine.
Why candidates choose this
Candidates might confuse the sequence if they think bidirectional communication happens immediately after receiving any Hello.
✗Down, Init, ExStart, 2-Way, ExchangeWrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
ExStart is placed before 2-Way, but OSPF requires 2-Way before moving to ExStart.
Why candidates choose this
Candidates may think database descriptor exchange starts immediately after Init, skipping the 2-Way state.
✗Down, Init, 2-Way, Exchange, ExStartWrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
Exchange is placed before ExStart, but the OSPF state machine requires ExStart first.
Why candidates choose this
Candidates might assume that exchanging database descriptors happens before negotiating master/slave roles.
Analysis generated from the official 200-301blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”
Visual reference
Quick reference
Routing Protocol Comparison
| Protocol | Metric | Max Hops | Algorithm | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIP v2 | Hop count | 15 | Bellman-Ford | Distance vector |
| OSPF | Cost (bandwidth) | Unlimited | Dijkstra (SPF) | Link state |
| EIGRP | Composite metric | Unlimited | DUAL | Hybrid |
| IS-IS | Cost | Unlimited | Dijkstra | Link state |
| BGP | Policy / attributes | Unlimited | Path vector | Path vector |
RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 6, 2026
This 200-301 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 200-301 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.