Question 1,434 of 1,705
Network DesignhardMultiple SelectObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is that both VPCs must have the 'Enable DNS Resolution' attribute set to true in their VPC settings, and the requester must accept the peering connection with DNS resolution enabled. This works because DNS resolution across a VPC peering connection relies on the Amazon-provided DNS server in each VPC being able to resolve private hostnames from the peered VPC’s CIDR, which requires the DNS resolution attribute to be enabled on both sides and the peering connection itself to be configured to support it. On the AWS Certified Advanced Networking Specialty ANS-C01 exam, this concept tests your understanding of how VPC peering handles DNS, often appearing as a trap where candidates mistakenly think DNS settings are configured at the VPC level rather than the peering connection level. A common memory tip is to remember that DNS resolution is a peering-level toggle, not a VPC-level toggle—think of it as a two-way handshake where both sides must opt in.

ANS-C01 Network Design Practice Question

This ANS-C01 practice question tests your understanding of network design. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A company has a VPC with a CIDR of 10.0.0.0/16. They have created a VPC peering connection with another VPC (CIDR 10.1.0.0/16). They want to enable DNS resolution between the VPCs. Which TWO actions must be taken?

Question 1hardmulti select
Read the full DNS explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The requester must accept the peering connection with the 'Enable DNS Resolution' option checked.

Options B and D are correct. To enable DNS resolution across a VPC peering connection, the requester must accept the peering connection with DNS resolution enabled, and the accepter must update the route tables. Option A is wrong because the VPCs must be in the same region? Actually, cross-region peering is allowed. Option C is wrong because the accepter does not need to modify the peering connection. Option E is wrong because DNS resolution settings are at the peering connection level, not the VPC level.

Key principle: Count usable hosts — not total addresses — and remember that the network and broadcast addresses are not available to hosts in standard IPv4 subnets.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The requester must accept the peering connection with the 'Enable DNS Resolution' option checked.

    Why this is correct

    The requester can enable DNS resolution when creating the peering connection.

    Related concept

    CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

  • Both VPCs must have the 'Enable DNS Resolution' attribute set to true in their VPC settings.

    Why this is correct

    Each VPC must have DNS resolution enabled for instances to use DNS.

    Related concept

    CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

  • Ensure both VPCs are in the same AWS region.

    Why it's wrong here

    DNS resolution across peering works for both intra-region and cross-region peering.

  • The accepter must modify the peering connection to enable DNS resolution from their side.

    Why it's wrong here

    Only the requester can enable DNS resolution; the accepter cannot modify that setting.

  • The route tables must include a route for the peered VPC's CIDR.

    Why it's wrong here

    Route tables are needed for connectivity but not specifically for DNS resolution.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses

Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
  • Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
  • Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
  • The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.

TExam Day Tips

  • Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
  • Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
  • Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.

Key takeaway

Count usable hosts — not total addresses — and remember that the network and broadcast addresses are not available to hosts in standard IPv4 subnets.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A healthcare organisation deploys an application with a public-facing web tier and a private database tier. The database subnet has no public IP and only accepts connections from the web tier's security group. Questions like this test whether you can design cloud network isolation using VNets/VPCs, subnets, and security group rules.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review block sizes, usable host formulas (2^n − 2), and how to find network and broadcast addresses for /24 through /30. Then practise related ANS-C01 subnetting questions on CIDR, address ranges, and subnet selection.

Related practice questions

Related ANS-C01 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free ANS-C01 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this ANS-C01 question test?

Network Design — This question tests Network Design — CIDR notation defines the prefix length..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The requester must accept the peering connection with the 'Enable DNS Resolution' option checked. — Options B and D are correct. To enable DNS resolution across a VPC peering connection, the requester must accept the peering connection with DNS resolution enabled, and the accepter must update the route tables. Option A is wrong because the VPCs must be in the same region? Actually, cross-region peering is allowed. Option C is wrong because the accepter does not need to modify the peering connection. Option E is wrong because DNS resolution settings are at the peering connection level, not the VPC level.

What should I do if I get this ANS-C01 question wrong?

Review block sizes, usable host formulas (2^n − 2), and how to find network and broadcast addresses for /24 through /30. Then practise related ANS-C01 subnetting questions on CIDR, address ranges, and subnet selection.

What is the key concept behind this question?

CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Same concept, more angles

1 more ways this is tested on ANS-C01

These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.

Variation 1. A company has a VPC with a CIDR of 10.0.0.0/16. They have set up a VPC peering connection with another VPC (CIDR 172.16.0.0/16). The route tables are configured correctly. However, instances in the first VPC cannot communicate with instances in the peered VPC. The security groups and network ACLs are configured to allow all traffic. What is the most likely cause?

hard
  • A.The DNS resolution settings for the VPC peering connection are not enabled.
  • B.The route tables in the VPCs are not propagated to the subnets.
  • C.The instances do not have ICMP traffic allowed.
  • D.The VPC CIDR ranges overlap.

Why A: Option B is correct because DNS resolution settings for VPC peering must be enabled for instances to resolve DNS hostnames across the peering connection. Option A is wrong because route tables are already configured correctly. Option C is wrong because the CIDRs are different and non-overlapping. Option D is wrong because ICMP is not required for basic connectivity.

Keep practising

More ANS-C01 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 20, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This ANS-C01 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Amazon Web Services certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the ANS-C01 exam.