OSPF neighbour adjacencies, route advertisements, and DR/BDR elections appear consistently on the CCNA. These questions test whether you can read OSPF state from show commands and identify why two routers fail to reach FULL adjacency or why a route isn't being learned.
Start Scenario PracticeA network engineer is troubleshooting an OSPF adjacency failure between two directly connected routers, R1 and R2. Both routers are configured with the same OSPF process ID and area. The engineer verifies that the interfaces are up and IP connectivity exists. Which configuration mismatch is most likely causing the adjacency to fail?
Explanation: An OSPF network type mismatch, such as one interface configured as point-to-point and the other as broadcast, prevents OSPF adjacency from forming. Options A, B, and C are incorrect: An MTU mismatch (A) usually allows adjacency to form but causes problems during LSA exchange; a passive interface (B) stops the router from sending hellos, so it wouldn't see the neighbor at all, but the question implies both interfaces are operational; an area ID mismatch (C) would prevent adjacency, but the scenario specifies that both routers are configured in the same area. Therefore, the most likely cause of the adjacency failure when interfaces are up and IP connectivity exists is a network type mismatch.
A service provider is running OSPF in their core network. After a link failure, routing convergence is taking longer than expected. The engineer suspects the issue is related to the SPF calculation. Which OSPF feature can reduce the SPF calculation time?
Explanation: Incremental SPF (iSPF) reduces SPF calculation time by recalculating only the affected portion of the Shortest Path Tree (SPT) after a topology change, rather than recomputing the entire tree. This is especially beneficial in large OSPF networks where full SPF runs are CPU-intensive and slow convergence.
Which THREE of the following are required for successful operation of OSPFv3 in an IPv6 service provider network?
Explanation: OSPFv3 requires interface-level activation using the 'ipv6 ospf <process> area <area>' command to enable the OSPFv3 process on a specific interface and associate it with an area. Without this, the interface will not participate in OSPFv3 neighbor discovery or routing updates, even if the process is configured globally.
An SP network is running OSPFv3 for IPv6 and needs to support traffic engineering extensions for RSVP-TE. Which three statements about OSPFv3 TE extensions are true?
Explanation: OSPFv3 uses Opaque LSA types 9, 10, and 11 for TE, with Type 10 carrying TE information link-state. OSPFv3 TE requires the OSPFv3 process to be configured for TE.
You are a network engineer at a service provider that offers L3VPN services. A customer complains that their VPN traffic is intermittently dropping. The network uses OSPF as the IGP, LDP for label distribution, and MP-BGP for VPNv4 route exchange. The PE routers are connected to two core routers (P1 and P2) in a redundant design. Upon investigation, you find that the BGP next-hop for some VPN prefixes is set to the loopback interface of the remote PE, but the route to that loopback is sometimes unreachable due to a flapping link between P1 and P2. The IGP converges, but the BGP prefixes take longer to recover. What is the most likely cause of the intermittent drops?
Explanation: The intermittent drops occur because BGP next-hop tracking (NHT) is not enabled. Without NHT, BGP relies solely on IGP convergence to detect reachability changes for the BGP next-hop (the remote PE loopback). When the link between P1 and P2 flaps, OSPF converges quickly, but BGP does not immediately re-evaluate its next-hop reachability; it waits for the next BGP scan interval (default 60 seconds) or until a BGP update is received. This delay causes the VPN prefixes to remain installed with an unreachable next-hop, leading to traffic drops until BGP eventually withdraws or re-advertises the routes.
+10 more scenario questions available
Practice all OSPF Troubleshooting ScenariosOSPF neighbour adjacencies, route advertisements, and DR/BDR elections appear consistently on the CCNA. These questions test whether you can read OSPF state from show commands and identify why two routers fail to reach FULL adjacency or why a route isn't being learned. These appear throughout the 350-501 and require you to apply your knowledge, not just recall facts.
Cisco doesn't publish an exact breakdown, but scenario-based questions (especially exhibit and command-output formats) make up a significant portion of the 350-501. Practicing each scenario type ensures you're ready for any format.
Yes. Courseiva provides free 350-501 scenario practice across all official exam domains. The platform includes scenario-based questions, command-output interpretation, topic-based practice, mock exams, and readiness tracking — no account required.
Launch a full OSPF Troubleshooting Scenarios session with instant scoring and detailed explanations.
Start Scenario Practice →