Courseiva

Splunk Certified Cybersecurity Defense Analyst (SPLK-5001) (SPLK-5001) (SPLK-5001) — Questions 226–283

283 questions total · 4 pages · All types, answers revealed

Page 3

Page 4 of 4

226
MCQeasy

A security analyst is reviewing the Incident Review dashboard in Splunk ES and wants to add a new field to the table that displays notable events. The field, 'src_ip', is already present in the notable event's raw data but not displayed. What should the analyst do to make this field visible in the Incident Review table?

A.Edit the correlation search to include 'src_ip' in the search results and re-run it.
B.Configure the 'Incident Review - Table Attributes' settings in Splunk ES to include 'src_ip'.
C.Modify the Incident Review dashboard's table settings to add 'src_ip' as a column.
D.Create a new dashboard that queries notable events and includes 'src_ip'.
AnswerB

Splunk ES provides a configuration page for Incident Review table attributes where administrators can specify which fields appear as columns. By adding 'src_ip' to the list of attributes, it will be displayed in the table. This is the correct and supported method to customize the Incident Review dashboard's columns without modifying underlying searches or dashboards.

Why this answer

The Incident Review table attributes are configurable through Splunk ES settings. Adding 'src_ip' to the list of attributes will make it appear as a column in the Incident Review dashboard, allowing analysts to see the source IP directly without altering the correlation search or creating custom dashboards.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that modifying the correlation search or dashboard XML is necessary, when Splunk ES offers a dedicated configuration for Incident Review table attributes.

227
Multi-Selectmedium

A security analyst is writing SPL searches to detect suspicious activity and wants to understand which commands can be used to filter or transform search results. Which TWO of the following statements about SPL commands are accurate? (Choose two.)

Select 2 answers
A.The rex command can only extract fields from indexed fields, not from the raw event text.
B.The table command permanently removes all fields not listed from the search results, affecting subsequent commands.
C.The search command can only be used as the first command in a search pipeline.
D.The stats command can calculate aggregate statistics such as count, sum, and average, grouped by one or more fields.
E.The where command filters results using eval expressions and can reference calculated fields created earlier in the search pipeline.
AnswersD, E

The stats command is the primary aggregation command in SPL. It supports functions like count, sum, avg, min, max, and dc, and the by clause groups results by specified fields. This allows analysts to summarize large volumes of events into meaningful metrics for detection and reporting.

Why this answer

The where command filters using eval expressions and can reference computed fields, while the stats command aggregates metrics grouped by fields. Both are fundamental SPL commands for filtering and transforming results. The other statements misrepresent search placement, the non-destructive nature of table, and the raw-text extraction capability of rex.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that table permanently removes fields and that rex only works on indexed fields, when table is display-only and rex extracts from raw text.

228
MCQhard

An analyst needs to review firewall traffic but only for events where the action field is explicitly 'blocked' and the bytes_out field is greater than 5000. Some events are missing the action field entirely. Which SPL search returns only events that satisfy both conditions?

A.index=firewall action=blocked OR bytes_out>5000
B.index=firewall action=blocked NOT bytes_out>5000
C.index=firewall action=blocked bytes_out>5000
D.index=firewall action=blocked bytes_out<5000
AnswerC

This is correct because base search terms using field=value and field>value are evaluated as Boolean AND conditions, so only events where action equals blocked and bytes_out exceeds 5000 are returned. Events missing the action field are automatically excluded because the term action=blocked cannot match them, satisfying the requirement to filter out incomplete events.

Why this answer

In SPL, multiple search terms typed into the base search are implicitly combined with AND logic. Writing action=blocked bytes_out>5000 therefore requires both field conditions to be true for an event to be returned. Because events missing the action field cannot satisfy action=blocked, they are silently dropped, which matches the requirement to review only complete, explicitly blocked high-volume traffic.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that multiple search terms are combined with OR or that missing fields are treated as matching the filter rather than being excluded.

229
MCQmedium

A security analyst notices that a correlation search configured to detect multiple failed logins across the organization is not triggering notable events, even though the raw events are searchable. The correlation search uses the Authentication data model. Upon investigation, the analyst finds that the Authentication data model is not accelerated. What is the most likely reason the correlation search is failing to generate notables?

A.The correlation search is configured to run in real-time mode, which is disabled for accelerated data models.
B.The correlation search requires the Authentication data model to be accelerated to efficiently retrieve and correlate events, and without acceleration, it may time out or return no results.
C.The correlation search is missing the 'action.notable' alert action, so it cannot create notable events.
D.The correlation search's cron schedule is set to run only during off-peak hours, so it hasn't executed yet.
AnswerB

Acceleration pre-computes data model summaries, enabling faster searches. Without acceleration, the correlation search may exceed time limits or fail to process large datasets, leading to no notables. In Splunk ES, many correlation searches depend on accelerated data models for performance and reliability. Thus, enabling acceleration on the Authentication data model is critical for this search to function.

Why this answer

The Authentication data model must be accelerated for correlation searches to efficiently query it. Without acceleration, the search may time out or return incomplete results, preventing notable event creation. Acceleration builds summaries that speed up searches, which is essential for timely detection in Splunk ES.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that correlation searches always work regardless of data model acceleration, overlooking that acceleration is often required for performance and successful execution.

230
Multi-Selectmedium

Which THREE attributes are commonly used to filter notable events in the Incident Review dashboard?

Select 3 answers
A.License type.
B.Owner.
C.Status.
D.Index name.
E.Urgency.
AnswersB, C, E

Owner filtering restricts the notable event list to those assigned to a specific analyst, supporting workload management and handover. It satisfies the stem's requirement because owner is a standard, editable field on notable events and appears as a built-in filter in the Incident Review dashboard.

Why this answer

In the Incident Review dashboard, notable events are triaged using the fields that describe the state and assignment of each notable, so Owner (B) is correct because filtering by owner lets analysts isolate the notables assigned to a specific person or team. Status (C) is correct because notables carry review states such as New, In Progress, Pending, Resolved, and Closed, and filtering by status is a primary way to find unreviewed or open items. Urgency (E) is correct because urgency (Critical, High, Medium, Low, Informational) is a core notable attribute used to prioritize and filter the highest-priority incidents.

License type (A) is not a notable-event attribute but a Splunk deployment/licensing property, and index name (D) is an underlying data-source detail rather than a standard Incident Review filter attribute.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests whether candidates confuse raw event fields (index, sourcetype) with notable event fields (owner, status, urgency) — the trap is picking index name because it's a familiar Splunk field.

231
MCQmedium

You suspect an attacker is using 'living-off-the-land' (LotL) techniques. Which Sysmon event should you analyze to see command-line arguments of suspicious utilities?

A.Event ID 7
B.Event ID 2
C.Event ID 5
D.Event ID 1
AnswerD

Sysmon Event ID 1 records process creation, including the full command line, parent process and hashes. This satisfies the LotL hunt because built-in utilities such as PowerShell or certutil appear as ordinary processes, and only their command-line arguments expose malicious use.

Why this answer

Sysmon Event ID 1 is the 'Process Create' event, which logs the full command line, image path, parent process, user, and hashes for every process launched. For detecting living-off-the-land techniques (e.g., powershell.exe, wmic.exe, certutil.exe with suspicious arguments), Event ID 1 is the definitive source for command-line arguments.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests Sysmon event ID memorization — candidates confuse Event ID 1 (Process Create) with Event ID 7 (Image Load) or Event ID 5 (Process Terminated), picking the wrong event for command-line analysis.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A (Event ID 7) is wrong because it logs Image Loaded events (DLL/module loads), which show which libraries a process loaded but not the command-line arguments used to launch it. Option B (Event ID 2) is wrong because it logs File Creation Time Changed events, which is a timestomping indicator, not process command lines. Option C (Event ID 5) is wrong because it logs Process Terminated events, which only record when a process ended, not how it was invoked.

232
Multi-Selectmedium

Which TWO commands are helpful for identifying specific patterns in data?

Select 2 answers
A.rename
B.sort
C.head
D.transaction
E.cluster
AnswersD, E

The transaction command groups related events sharing common field values into single transactions, revealing multi-event patterns such as sequences of actions. This satisfies the pattern-identification criterion because it exposes relationships across events that individual searches would miss.

Why this answer

The transaction command (D) is correct because it groups events that share a common value (such as a session ID or transaction ID) into a single event, letting you identify patterns across related events rather than viewing them in isolation. The cluster command (E) is correct because it uses pattern recognition to group together similar events that share common text or field values, which directly surfaces recurring patterns in the data. The rename command (A) only changes the name of a field and does not reveal patterns, while sort (B) merely orders results and head (C) only limits output to the first N results, so neither performs pattern identification.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests whether candidates pick sort or head as pattern-identification commands, when those only order or truncate results — pattern grouping requires transaction or cluster.

233
MCQmedium

An analyst is using Splunk Enterprise Security to investigate a potential data exfiltration event. They need to determine which MITRE ATT&CK tactic describes the adversary's objective of stealing data from the compromised network. Which tactic should they reference?

A.Exfiltration
B.Collection
C.Impact
D.Command and Control
AnswerA

Exfiltration is the ATT&CK tactic that describes techniques adversaries use to steal data from your network, such as over command and control channels or via physical media. In Splunk ES, detections for large outbound transfers or unusual DNS queries map to this tactic. Focusing on Exfiltration helps analysts identify and block data loss at the point of egress.

Why this answer

Exfiltration is the correct ATT&CK tactic for data theft. It encompasses techniques like exfiltration over C2 channel, exfiltration over alternative protocol, and exfiltration over physical medium. In Splunk ES, analysts should look for correlation searches that detect anomalous outbound data volumes or connections to known malicious IPs, and ensure these are tagged with the Exfiltration tactic for accurate reporting.

Exam trap

The trap here is equating the objective of stealing data with Command and Control, but C2 is about communication, not the actual data theft.

234
Multi-Selectmedium

An analyst is investigating a potential pass-the-hash attack in Splunk ES. Which TWO of the following are indicators that should be reviewed in Windows Security event logs? (Choose two.)

Select 2 answers
A.Event Code 4624 with Logon Type 3 and NTLM authentication
B.Event Code 4768 with Kerberos TGT request
C.Event Code 4776 with NTLM credential validation
D.Event Code 5140 with network share access
E.Event Code 4672 with SeDebugPrivilege assigned
AnswersA, C

Event Code 4624 with Logon Type 3 (network logon) and NTLM authentication indicates a logon using NTLM, which is common in pass-the-hash attacks. Attackers use stolen NTLM hashes to authenticate laterally. Reviewing these events for anomalous source IPs or accounts can reveal pass-the-hash activity. It is a key indicator to investigate.

Why this answer

Pass-the-hash attacks leverage stolen NTLM hashes to authenticate, often resulting in Event Code 4624 with Logon Type 3 and NTLM authentication, and Event Code 4776 for credential validation. These events, when correlated, can reveal lateral movement. Other event codes like 4672, 4768, and 5140 are not specific to pass-the-hash and may generate false positives.

Focusing on NTLM-related events is crucial for accurate detection.

Exam trap

The trap here is overlooking Event Code 4776, which specifically logs NTLM credential validation, a hallmark of pass-the-hash.

235
MCQmedium

An analyst is reviewing a notable event for a potential malware infection on a Windows endpoint. The event includes a file hash. To determine if the file is known malicious, the analyst wants to check its reputation using Splunk ES's threat intelligence framework. Which action should the analyst take?

A.Search the file hash in the Threat Intelligence data model to see if it matches any threat intel sources.
B.Run a search against the Endpoint data model to find all processes that executed the file hash.
C.Check the 'File Hash' field in the Malware data model to see if it is associated with any known malware families.
D.Use the 'threatlist' lookup to manually add the hash and then check if it appears in any notable events.
AnswerA

The Threat Intelligence data model in Splunk ES stores indicators of compromise (IOCs) from various threat feeds. Searching for the file hash in this data model will reveal if it is known malicious. This is the standard method to leverage integrated threat intelligence for file reputation within Splunk ES.

Why this answer

Splunk ES integrates threat intelligence feeds into the Threat Intelligence data model. By searching for the file hash there, the analyst can quickly see if it matches any known malicious indicators. The other options focus on endpoint activity or manual lists, which do not provide the same breadth of reputation data from multiple sources.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that any data model containing file hashes provides reputation; only the Threat Intelligence data model is designed for IOC matching.

236
Multi-Selecthard

Which THREE of the following are benefits of using Risk-Based Alerting (RBA) in Splunk ES?

Select 3 answers
A.Improved focus on behavioral indicators
B.Prioritization of threats based on entity risk
C.Automatic remediation of threats
D.Automatic license management
E.Reduction of alert noise
AnswersA, B, E

RBA assigns risk scores to entities from detections rather than alerting on each individually, so analysts triage behaviour across users, hosts and IPs. This surfaces correlated behavioural indicators that single-event correlation searches miss, satisfying the stem's benefit of focusing on behaviour rather than isolated events.

Why this answer

Option A is correct because RBA shifts detection from individual notable events to behavioral indicators, aggregating related events into risk attributions on entities (users, systems) so analysts can spot patterns of behavior rather than isolated signatures. Option B is correct because RBA assigns risk scores to entities via risk rules and risk factors, allowing threats to be prioritized by accumulated entity risk rather than by raw event severity. Option E is correct because RBA consolidates many low-fidelity or individually insignificant events into a smaller set of high-risk entities, thereby reducing alert noise and analyst fatigue.

Option C is not correct because RBA is a detection and prioritization framework; Splunk ES does not automatically remediate threats, which requires separate orchestration tools such as Splunk SOAR. Option D is not correct because license management is handled by the Splunk license manager and is unrelated to RBA's risk scoring and alerting capabilities.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests the misconception that RBA includes automated remediation or license optimization, when its actual benefits are behavioral focus, risk-based prioritization, and noise reduction.

237
MCQhard

An analyst is investigating a potential pass-the-hash attack. They want to search for successful authentications that used NTLM authentication where the source workstation differs from the destination workstation. Which Splunk ES data model and field combination is most appropriate?

A.Authentication data model, filtering on authentication_method=NTLM and src!=dest
B.Network_Traffic data model, filtering on dest_port=445 and src!=dest
C.Endpoint.Processes data model, filtering on process_name=lsass.exe and user=SYSTEM
D.Intrusion_Detection data model, filtering on signature=Pass-the-Hash
AnswerA

The Authentication data model captures authentication events, including the authentication method and source/destination hosts. Pass-the-hash attacks often involve NTLM authentication from a source workstation to a different destination workstation. Filtering on authentication_method=NTLM and src!=dest helps identify such lateral movement, which is a key indicator of pass-the-hash.

Why this answer

The Authentication data model is the correct choice because it records authentication events with details like authentication_method, src, dest, and user. Pass-the-hash attacks typically manifest as successful NTLM authentications where the source workstation is different from the destination workstation, indicating lateral movement. By filtering on authentication_method=NTLM and src!=dest, the analyst can identify potential pass-the-hash activity, which is a critical step in detecting and responding to this attack.

Exam trap

The trap here is focusing on process or network data instead of authentication logs, as pass-the-hash is fundamentally an authentication event that requires examining authentication method and source/destination relationships.

238
MCQhard

An attacker has cleared the Windows Security Event log to hide their tracks. Which data model can detect this action?

A.Endpoint
B.Change Analysis
C.Network Traffic
D.Authentication
AnswerB

Clearing the Windows Security Event log generates event ID 1102, which records audit log deletion. The Change Analysis data model tracks changes to system and audit configurations, making it the model that surfaces this action.

Why this answer

The Change Analysis data model in Splunk ES tracks changes to system configurations, including audit log clears and service changes. Clearing the Windows Security Event log generates Event ID 1102 (or 104 for older systems), which the Change Analysis data model captures as a change event, making it the correct detection source.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests whether candidates map log-clearing to the Authentication or Endpoint data models — the correct mapping is Change Analysis, which is specifically designed for system state changes including audit log clears.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because the Endpoint data model focuses on process execution, file system changes, and registry activity — it does not specifically model audit log clearing as a change event. Option C is wrong because the Network Traffic data model covers network flows and connections, not local log-clearing actions. Option D is wrong because the Authentication data model tracks logon/logoff events, not the clearing of the security log itself.

239
Multi-Selecthard

Which THREE commands are used to manipulate multi-value fields?

Select 3 answers
A.rename
B.mvcombine
C.table
D.mvexpand
E.mvfilter
AnswersB, D, E

`mvcombine` merges values from multiple events into a single multi-value field, satisfying the requirement to manipulate multi-value fields. It groups values sharing a common field, combining them into one delimited list per group. This directly transforms event-level values into a consolidated multi-value field, which is the manipulation the question demands.

Why this answer

In Splunk's Search Processing Language (SPL), multi-value fields are handled by commands that specifically operate on fields containing multiple values per event. Option B, mvcombine, is correct because it takes a single-value field and merges the values across events into a multi-value field, effectively creating or manipulating multi-value data. Option D, mvexpand, is correct because it expands each value of a multi-value field into a separate event, directly manipulating the multi-value field's structure.

Option E, mvfilter, is correct because it filters the values within a multi-value field using an expression, thereby manipulating the contents of that multi-value field. Option A, rename, is incorrect because it simply renames a field and does not specifically handle multi-value semantics. Option C, table, is incorrect because it only formats results into a tabular output and does not manipulate multi-value fields.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests whether candidates can distinguish MV-specific commands from general field manipulation commands — rename and table feel like they 'manipulate fields' but don't touch multi-value semantics.

240
Multi-Selecthard

Which THREE of the following are valid ways to filter events based on time?

Select 3 answers
A.stats _time
B.earliest=, latest=
C.bin _time
D.index=logs earliest=-1h latest=now
E.where _time > relative_time(now(), "-24h")
AnswersB, D, E

The `earliest=` and `latest=` search command arguments restrict results to a specified time window, satisfying the requirement to filter events by time. They accept absolute timestamps or relative modifiers such as `-24h`, applying the constraint at search time rather than relying on indexed fields.

Why this answer

Option B (earliest=, latest=) is correct because these are the standard time-range arguments accepted by the search command to constrain events to a specific time window. Option D (index=logs earliest=-1h latest=now) is correct because it applies those earliest/latest time modifiers directly in a search, filtering events to the last hour up to the current time. Option E (where _time > relative_time(now(), "-24h")) is correct because the where command evaluates a boolean expression on the _time field, using relative_time to compute a 24-hour-ago timestamp and filtering events newer than it.

Option A (stats _time) is not a filtering method; stats is an aggregation command and _time alone does not restrict events by time. Option C (bin _time) is also not a filter; bin buckets timestamps into discrete intervals for grouping or charting rather than excluding events outside a time range.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests the confusion between commands that transform _time (bin, stats) and those that actually filter events by time (earliest/latest, where with relative_time), tricking candidates into selecting aggregation commands as valid filters.

241
MCQmedium

You are tasked with reporting on 'Lateral Movement' (MITRE ATT&CK) using Splunk ES. Which Data Model must be populated and enabled for this report to function correctly?

A.The 'Network Resolution' Data Model.
B.The 'Vulnerability' Data Model.
C.The 'Authentication' Data Model.
D.The 'Malware' Data Model.
AnswerC

Lateral movement detection relies on authentication events, since attackers pivoting between hosts generate logon activity across systems. The Authentication Data Model normalises these events, so populating and enabling it gives the correlation searches the data required to surface lateral movement in Splunk ES.

Why this answer

Lateral movement in MITRE ATT&CK involves an adversary moving from one host to another, which is detected in Splunk ES primarily through authentication activity — logons, remote service creation, and credential use across systems. The Authentication data model normalizes logon/logoff, privilege escalation, and related events, and ES correlation searches for lateral movement (e.g., 'Detect Lateral Movement' or 'Excessive Authentication Failures') rely on it. Without the Authentication data model populated and accelerated, those detections cannot fire.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests which CIM data model maps to a given ATT&CK tactic; candidates confuse Malware or Network Resolution with Authentication, missing that lateral movement is fundamentally an authentication/remote-access behavior.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because the Network Resolution data model maps IP addresses to hostnames and enriches network traffic; it supports DNS/network context, not authentication-based lateral movement detection. Option B is wrong because the Vulnerability data model tracks vulnerability scan findings and CVEs on assets; it is used for risk and patch management, not for detecting adversary movement between hosts. Option D is wrong because the Malware data model normalizes antivirus/endpoint malware detections and file/process artifacts; while useful for endpoint compromise, it does not capture the authentication and remote-access events that define lateral movement.

242
MCQmedium

Which dashboard provides a summary of all assets categorized by their criticality within the organization?

A.Threat Activity
B.User Activity
C.Access Anomalies
D.Asset Investigator
AnswerD

Asset Investigator aggregates every discovered asset and groups them by business criticality, directly satisfying the stem's requirement for an organisation-wide summary categorised by criticality. Unlike posture or vulnerability dashboards, it centres on asset inventory classification rather than risk scoring, making it the appropriate view for this specific reporting need.

Why this answer

The Asset Investigator dashboard in Splunk ES provides a consolidated view of assets, including their criticality, identity, and associated risk. It is the primary place to see assets categorized by business criticality and to pivot into asset-specific investigation. This matches the requirement of summarizing all assets by criticality.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests the distinction between dashboards that summarize entities (Asset Investigator for assets, User Activity for users) and dashboards that summarize events or anomalies, so candidates who pick Threat Activity because it 'sounds like a summary' fall into the trap.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Threat Activity focuses on threat-related events and intel matches, not on asset criticality categorization. Option B is wrong because User Activity centers on user behavior and identities, not on asset inventories. Option C is wrong because Access Anomalies highlights unusual access patterns, not a catalog of assets by criticality.

243
MCQhard

During an investigation, an analyst needs to correlate a series of authentication failures with subsequent successful logins from the same source across multiple indexers. Which Splunk Enterprise Security capability is most appropriate for this task?

A.The Network Traffic data model, which captures sessions and can reveal authentication attempts embedded in network flows.
B.The Risk data model, which aggregates risk events and can show whether authentication failures contributed to an entity's score.
C.The Authentication data model, which normalizes authentication events and supports pivoting across users, sources, and outcomes.
D.The Web data model, which captures HTTP activity and can include login attempts to web applications.
AnswerC

The Authentication data model normalizes authentication activity from various sources into a common schema, including user, source, action, and outcome fields. This normalization enables the analyst to correlate failures and subsequent successes from the same source efficiently, even when logs originate from different systems across multiple indexers. It is the intended tool for this type of authentication-centric investigation.

Why this answer

The Authentication data model normalizes authentication events from diverse sources into a consistent schema with fields for user, source, action, and outcome. This allows analysts to correlate failed and successful authentications from the same source across multiple indexers. It is purpose-built for authentication investigations, unlike network, risk, or web data models that serve different analytic needs.

Exam trap

The trap here is choosing a data model based on where events might transit, such as network or web, instead of the one that normalizes authentication outcomes.

244
MCQmedium

A security analyst needs to identify all Windows event codes where the count of events exceeds 100 in the last 24 hours, and then display the results sorted by count in descending order. The base search returns events with the field 'EventCode'. Which SPL search accomplishes this?

A.index=windows EventCode=* | top limit=100 EventCode | sort - count
B.index=windows EventCode=* | stats count by EventCode | where count > 100 | sort - count
C.index=windows EventCode=* | stats count by EventCode | sort - count | where count > 100
D.index=windows EventCode=* | where count > 100 | stats count by EventCode | sort - count
AnswerB

This search filters all events with any EventCode, then uses stats to count events per EventCode, filters with where count > 100, and sorts descending by count. It correctly applies the threshold after aggregation and sorts the results as required.

Why this answer

The search must count events per EventCode, filter for counts greater than 100, and sort descending. The stats command aggregates counts, where filters after aggregation, and sort orders the final results. Placing where after stats is correct because count is only available after aggregation.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that the where command can reference the count field before the stats command has created it.

245
Multi-Selecthard

An analyst is investigating a potential command-and-control (C2) beaconing incident. They observe periodic outbound connections from an internal host to an external IP address at regular intervals with small data transfers. Which two Splunk ES features or techniques would best help confirm and analyze this beaconing activity? (Choose two.)

Select 2 answers
A.Use the `streamstats` command to calculate the time delta between consecutive connections from the same host to the external IP, then look for consistent intervals.
B.Leverage the `predict` command to forecast future connection times based on historical data, then compare actual connection times to the forecast to detect anomalies.
C.Use the `transaction` command to group connections by source and destination IP, then calculate the standard deviation of the time between connections to identify low variance.
D.Create a correlation search in Splunk ES that triggers when the same source and destination IP pair exceeds a threshold of connections per hour, ignoring the regularity of intervals.
E.Utilize the `bucket` command to group connections into fixed time windows, then count the number of connections per bucket to identify spikes.
AnswersA, C

The `streamstats` command can compute the time difference between successive events, such as connections from an internal host to an external IP. By analyzing the delta times, you can identify regular intervals indicative of beaconing. This is a core technique in Splunk for detecting periodic behavior without relying solely on pre-built correlation searches, and it works well with raw network traffic logs.

Why this answer

Beaconing is characterized by periodic connections with consistent intervals. Calculating time deltas between consecutive connections using `streamstats` or grouping connections with `transaction` and analyzing the variance of intervals are both effective ways to detect this regularity. These techniques focus on the timing pattern rather than just volume, which helps distinguish beaconing from normal traffic and reduces false positives.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that a high volume of connections is the primary indicator of beaconing, when in fact regularity and consistency of intervals are more telling.

246
MCQmedium

Your organization is adopting the CIS Controls v8. You are using Splunk to track 'Inventory and Control of Enterprise Assets'. Which Data Model is essential for this visibility?

A.Vulnerability Data Model.
B.Assets and Identity Data Model.
C.Endpoint Data Model.
D.Network Traffic Data Model.
AnswerB

The Assets and Identity Data Model normalises asset inventory fields such as hostnames, IP addresses and ownership, which the CIS Control 1 requirement for tracking enterprise assets depends on. It is the only model providing that asset-centric visibility for Splunk searches.

Why this answer

The Assets and Identity Data Model is the Splunk Common Information Model (CIM) data model that normalizes asset inventory and identity information — hostnames, IPs, MAC addresses, OS details, and user identities. CIS Control 1 (Inventory and Control of Enterprise Assets) requires knowing every device on the network, and this data model is purpose-built to provide that visibility. It is the essential model for tracking enterprise assets in Splunk.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests whether candidates conflate the Assets and Identity Data Model (inventory) with the Endpoint or Vulnerability Data Models (behavior/findings) — remember Control 1 is about knowing what exists, not what's wrong with it.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because the Vulnerability Data Model tracks CVEs and vulnerability scan findings against assets — it presupposes you already know your assets and addresses CIS Control 7 (Continuous Vulnerability Management), not Control 1. Option C is wrong because the Endpoint Data Model captures process, file, registry, and service activity on endpoints — it's about endpoint behavior telemetry, not asset inventory. Option D is wrong because the Network Traffic Data Model normalizes flow data (src/dest, bytes, ports) for traffic analysis, which supports network monitoring controls but does not enumerate enterprise assets.

247
MCQeasy

During a proactive threat hunt, you want to quickly identify processes that were executed from a temporary directory such as C:\\Users\\Public on Windows endpoints, using Sysmon data. Which Splunk search is most appropriate to surface this activity?

A.index=sysmon EventCode=11 | where like(TargetFilename, "%Public%")
B.index=sysmon EventCode=3 | where like(DestinationIp, "%Public%")
C.index=sysmon | stats count by Image | where count < 5
D.index=sysmon EventCode=1 | where like(Image, "%\\Users\\Public\\%")
AnswerD

Sysmon EventCode 1 records process creation and includes the Image field with the full executable path. Filtering where Image contains the Public directory surfaces executions from that untrusted location, which is a common staging area for attackers and a valid hunt hypothesis.

Why this answer

Sysmon EventCode 1 is the process creation event and carries the Image field with the full path of the executable. Filtering on the Public directory isolates executions from a location where legitimate software rarely runs, which is a strong indicator of staging or malicious activity and directly supports the hunt hypothesis.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing Sysmon event types, assuming any event with a file path can answer a process-execution question when only process creation records the image path.

248
MCQeasy

A security analyst is reviewing the Cyber Kill Chain phases and wants to map Splunk ES detections to the "Command and Control" phase. Which of the following data sources would be most relevant for detecting command and control communications?

A.Endpoint process execution logs
B.Authentication logs
C.Email gateway logs
D.Firewall logs
AnswerD

Firewall logs record network connections, including source and destination IP addresses, ports, and protocols. Command and control (C2) communications often involve outbound connections to malicious servers. By analyzing firewall logs for unusual destinations or beaconing patterns, analysts can detect C2 activity. Therefore, firewall logs are a primary data source for identifying C2 communications in the Cyber Kill Chain.

Why this answer

Command and Control (C2) communications involve compromised hosts communicating with attacker-controlled infrastructure. Firewall logs provide visibility into network connections, including outbound traffic, which is essential for detecting C2 channels. By analyzing firewall logs for suspicious destinations, unusual ports, or beaconing behavior, analysts can identify C2 activity.

Other data sources like endpoint or authentication logs may provide context but are not as directly relevant for network-based C2 detection.

Exam trap

The trap here is focusing on endpoint data for a network-centric phase, overlooking that C2 is primarily about network communications.

249
Multi-Selecthard

An analyst is investigating a suspected credential dumping attack on a Windows host. They want to identify evidence of this activity in Splunk ES. Which TWO of the following are valid indicators of credential dumping that can be found in Splunk ES data? (Choose two.)

Select 2 answers
A.Anomalous number of failed logon attempts
B.Presence of a file named “lsass.dmp” in a temp directory
C.Creation of a new service with a random name
D.Unexpected modification of the hosts file
E.Access to lsass.exe with suspicious access rights
AnswersB, E

Tools like ProcDump or Task Manager can create a memory dump of lsass.exe, often saved as lsass.dmp. The Endpoint.Filesystem data model can detect the creation of such files. This is a direct artifact of credential dumping, as the dump file contains credential material. Its presence in a temp directory is highly suspicious.

Why this answer

Credential dumping involves extracting credentials from memory or files. Access to lsass.exe with suspicious access rights indicates an attempt to read its memory, where credentials are stored. The creation of a file named lsass.dmp is a direct artifact of dumping the lsass process memory.

Both indicators are observable in Splunk ES via endpoint data models and are strong evidence of credential dumping activity.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing general attack indicators like service creation or failed logons with the specific artifacts of credential dumping, which focus on lsass access and memory dump files.

250
MCQhard

When using 'stats', how can you include the values of a field as columns in your output?

A.stats count by host, sourcetype
B.stats count by host | transpose
C.stats count by host, sourcetype | xyseries host, sourcetype, count
D.stats pivot host sourcetype
AnswerC

xyseries pivots the count field so that host values become rows and sourcetype values become columns, satisfying the requirement to display field values as columns. The preceding stats count by host, sourcetype supplies the aggregated values that xyseries then reshapes into a tabular, column-oriented layout.

Why this answer

The xyseries command converts the results of a stats aggregation into a matrix (pivot) format, using one field for rows, another for column headers, and a numeric field for cell values. In this case, 'stats count by host, sourcetype' produces rows of (host, sourcetype, count), and 'xyseries host, sourcetype, count' pivots sourcetype values into distinct columns with counts as cell values. This is the canonical SPL way to turn grouped stats output into a wide table with field values as column headers.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests whether candidates confuse 'transpose' (row/column swap) with 'xyseries' (true pivot of field values into columns) — many pick transpose thinking it produces named columns.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because 'stats count by host, sourcetype' produces a long-format table with one row per host/sourcetype combination, not separate columns for each sourcetype value. Option B is wrong because 'transpose' simply swaps rows and columns of the existing result set — it does not pivot a specific field's values into named columns and typically produces a generic 'row 1, row 2' header structure. Option D is wrong because 'stats pivot' is not a valid SPL command; pivoting is done via the pivot command (data model based) or xyseries, not as a stats function.

251
Multi-Selecteasy

Which TWO of the following are key components of the Splunk ES Threat Intelligence framework?

Select 2 answers
A.Threat Source management
B.Forwarder management
C.Dashboard customization
D.Incident classification
E.Threat Intelligence collections
AnswersA, E

Threat Source management is a core component, letting analysts configure, enable and prioritise the external intelligence feeds that populate the framework. It satisfies the stem's requirement for key components by governing which sources supply indicators, alongside intelligence downloads and lookups, ensuring only vetted feeds drive correlation searches and notable event enrichment.

Why this answer

Option A (Threat Source management) is correct because the Splunk ES Threat Intelligence framework relies on configuring threat sources (such as local CSV lookups, threat intelligence feeds, or TAXII/STIX integrations) to ingest and normalize indicators of compromise into the system. Option E (Threat Intelligence collections) is correct because collections are the core construct that groups related threat intelligence data (e.g., IPs, domains, file hashes) and maps them to intelligence sources for use in correlation searches and adaptive response. Forwarder management (B) belongs to Splunk deployment/server administration for data collection, not the threat intelligence framework.

Dashboard customization (C) is a general UI/presentation feature and not a structural component of the TI framework. Incident classification (D) relates to incident review and notable event workflow in ES, but it is not one of the key components that define the Threat Intelligence framework itself.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests whether candidates can separate the threat intelligence data pipeline (sources and collections) from adjacent ES features like forwarder management and incident workflow, so picking operational or UI features is the trap.

252
MCQeasy

A security analyst is investigating a potential insider threat and needs to see the number of events per hour for a specific user over the past 48 hours. The events are in the 'index=insider' with a field 'user'. Which SPL search will produce a time chart showing hourly event counts for that user?

A.index=insider user=john.doe | timechart span=1h count
B.index=insider user=john.doe | stats count by date_hour
C.index=insider user=john.doe | chart count over _time by user
D.index=insider user=john.doe | bucket _time span=1h | stats count by _time
AnswerA

The timechart command with span=1h automatically buckets events into hourly intervals and counts them, producing a time-series chart. Filtering by user=john.doe focuses on the specific user, and the result is a chart of event counts per hour.

Why this answer

The timechart command is specifically designed to create time-series charts, and with span=1h it buckets events into hourly intervals. Filtering by the user ensures only that user's events are counted, resulting in the desired hourly event count chart.

Exam trap

The trap here is using bucket or date_hour instead of timechart, which may produce counts but not the intended time-series visualization.

253
Multi-Selectmedium

You are aligning your Splunk ES deployment with the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) to improve your organization's security posture. The CSF Core consists of five functions: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. Which TWO of the following Splunk ES capabilities most directly support the 'Respond' function? (Choose two.)

Select 2 answers
A.Incident review and collaboration tools
B.Asset and identity correlation for context enrichment
C.Threat intelligence framework for ingesting indicators
D.Adaptive response actions to automatically block IPs
E.Risk analysis dashboard for prioritizing vulnerabilities
AnswersA, D

The Respond function includes activities to take action regarding a detected cybersecurity event. Splunk ES's incident review and collaboration tools allow analysts to triage, investigate, and coordinate response efforts. Features like the incident review dashboard, commenting, and assignment of investigations directly support the Respond function by enabling efficient incident handling and communication among team members.

Why this answer

The Respond function of the NIST CSF focuses on taking action after a security event is detected. Splunk ES's incident review and collaboration tools facilitate investigation and coordination, while adaptive response actions enable automated containment and mitigation. Together, these capabilities directly support the Respond function by streamlining incident handling and executing response measures.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that threat intelligence or risk analysis directly support Respond, when they primarily enable Detect and Identify functions.

254
MCQmedium

A security analyst needs to identify the percentage of total authentication events that each user account generated over the past week. The search must return the user, the count of events for that user, and the percentage each user represents of all authentication events, sorted so the largest share appears first. Which SPL search accomplishes this?

A.index=auth action=* | stats count BY user | eval pct=(count/sum(count))*100 | sort - pct
B.index=auth action=* | stats count BY user | addtotals | eval pct=(count/Total)*100 | sort - pct
C.index=auth action=* | top user | eval pct=(count/total)*100 | sort - pct
D.index=auth action=* | stats count BY user | eventstats sum(count) AS total | eval pct=round((count/total)*100,2) | sort - pct
AnswerD

This search aggregates events per user with stats, then uses eventstats to append the sum of all user counts as a running total field across every row, and eval calculates each user's percentage of that total. Sorting descending by pct places the largest share first, which is exactly the requested output.

Why this answer

The requirement is a per-row percentage against a grand total. stats collapses events into one row per user with a count, and eventstats sum(count) broadcasts the overall total onto every row so eval can divide each user's count by it. Sorting on the computed percentage descending satisfies the ordering requirement.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming eval can call aggregate functions like sum(count) to get a grand total, when aggregation must come from stats or eventstats first.

255
MCQmedium

You are configuring CIS Benchmarks in Splunk for your Linux environment. Which tool/app is the standard for ingesting and reporting these compliance checks?

A.Splunk Add-on for Linux Auditd.
B.Splunk App for Infrastructure (SAI).
C.Splunk App for CIS Benchmarks.
D.Splunk Enterprise Security Vulnerability Scanner.
AnswerC

The Splunk App for CIS Benchmarks provides prebuilt dashboards, data models and correlation searches that ingest CIS-CAT assessment output and report pass/fail per control, directly satisfying the requirement to ingest and report Linux CIS compliance checks without custom field extraction or search development.

Why this answer

The Splunk App for CIS Benchmarks is the standard tool for ingesting and reporting CIS Benchmark compliance checks in Splunk. It provides pre-built dashboards, reports, and data models specifically for CIS compliance monitoring across various platforms, including Linux.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests which Splunk app is used for specific compliance frameworks — candidates may confuse the CIS Benchmarks app with the Linux Auditd add-on or the Infrastructure app, which serve different purposes.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because the Splunk Add-on for Linux Auditd is used to collect auditd logs, not specifically for CIS Benchmark reporting. Option B is wrong because the Splunk App for Infrastructure (SAI) is for infrastructure monitoring and metrics, not CIS compliance. Option D is wrong because there is no standard 'Splunk Enterprise Security Vulnerability Scanner' app; ES is a SIEM, not a CIS benchmark scanner.

256
MCQmedium

An analyst identifies a command-and-control (C2) beaconing pattern. Which search command would be best used to identify the frequency of connections to a specific domain?

A.stats
B.timechart
C.transaction
D.eval
AnswerB

Timechart aggregates events into time-based buckets, directly exposing the periodic interval of connections to the specified domain. This satisfies the stem's requirement to identify beaconing frequency, since regular spikes at consistent intervals reveal the C2 rhythm that a raw event listing would obscure.

Why this answer

timechart is designed to plot aggregated values over time, making it ideal for visualizing the regularity of connections to a specific domain. By running timechart count by domain (or by dest), an analyst can see evenly spaced spikes that indicate beaconing intervals. This time-series view is exactly what C2 beacon detection requires.

Exam trap

The trap is that candidates pick stats because it can also count events by domain — but stats loses the time dimension, and beaconing detection is fundamentally about timing regularity, which only a time-series command like timechart reveals.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because stats produces a flat aggregation table without a time axis, so it cannot reveal the periodic timing pattern that defines beaconing. Option C is wrong because transaction groups related events into a single transaction based on start/end conditions — it is useful for session reconstruction but does not visualize frequency over time. Option D is wrong because eval is a field-manipulation command for creating or transforming fields; it performs no aggregation or time-series analysis on its own.

257
MCQeasy

Which command is used to append results from one search to another?

A.add [search index=other]
B.join [search index=other]
C.append [search index=other]
D.combine [search index=other]
AnswerC

append runs a subsearch and adds its results to the current result set, which is exactly the concatenation the stem describes. It differs from join, which correlates fields, and union, which merges datasets rather than appending.

Why this answer

The append command is correct because it takes the results of the current search and adds the results of a subsearch to the end of the result set, effectively combining two result sets vertically. The syntax append [search index=other] runs the subsearch and appends its output to the main pipeline. This is the standard Splunk command for concatenating results from separate searches without joining on a common field.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests the distinction between append (vertical row addition) and join (horizontal field-based combination), tricking candidates into choosing join because they think 'combine results' means joining on a field.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A (add) is wrong because there is no Splunk command named 'add' for appending search results; 'add' is not a valid SPL command in this context. Option B (join) is wrong because join combines results horizontally based on a common field, not by appending rows, and it has performance limitations. Option D (combine) is wrong because 'combine' is not a valid Splunk command for appending results; it does not exist in SPL for this purpose.

258
Multi-Selectmedium

A security analyst is documenting the key phases of a Splunk Enterprise Security investigation workflow for a new team member. Which two phases are essential components of this workflow? (Choose two.)

Select 2 answers
A.Immediate escalation of every notable to senior management regardless of severity.
B.Regular deletion of all historical notable events to maintain system performance.
C.Triage and prioritization of notables based on risk scores and urgency.
D.Evidence collection and correlation using Incident Review and related data sources.
E.Automated remediation of all detected threats without human intervention.
AnswersC, D

Triage and prioritization are fundamental to the investigation workflow, as they help analysts focus on the most critical notables first. Risk scores and urgency provide context for ordering investigations, ensuring that high-impact threats are addressed promptly. This phase is essential for efficient SOC operations.

Why this answer

Triage and prioritization, and evidence collection and correlation, are core phases of the Splunk Enterprise Security investigation workflow. They ensure analysts focus on high-risk notables and gather necessary context. The other options are either impractical or not part of the standard workflow.

Exam trap

The trap here is thinking that full automation or blanket escalation replaces human-led triage and evidence correlation, which are the actual essential phases.

259
MCQhard

When configuring the 'Risk Analysis' adaptive response, what does the 'risk_score' parameter represent?

A.The severity level of the notable event.
B.The threshold for triggering a notable.
C.The total risk score for the object.
D.The value added to the object's risk score.
AnswerD

The risk_score parameter supplies the numeric increment applied to an object's existing risk score, not a replacement value. Splunk ES sums these contributions from risk rules and adaptive responses, so the constraint that the object's cumulative risk reflects added weight is satisfied by this additive behaviour.

Why this answer

In the Risk Analysis adaptive response, the 'risk_score' parameter specifies the numeric value that will be added to the risk score of the object (user, system, or other entity) associated with the notable event. It is the incremental contribution of that specific risk event, not the object's total score or a threshold.

Exam trap

The trap is conflating the per-event risk_score parameter (the value added) with the object's aggregated total risk score or with a threshold — candidates often pick 'total risk score' because the wording sounds plausible.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because severity level is a separate notable event attribute (informational, low, medium, high, critical) and is not what the risk_score parameter represents. Option B is wrong because thresholds for triggering notables are defined in correlation search configuration (e.g., risk threshold settings), not in the adaptive response's risk_score parameter. Option C is wrong because the total risk score for an object is the aggregated result computed by the Risk Analysis framework, not the value supplied to the adaptive response — the adaptive response contributes one component to that total.

260
MCQmedium

What is the primary function of the 'Risk Notable' correlation search in Splunk ES?

A.To alert when an object's risk score exceeds a threshold.
B.To clear old risk events from memory.
C.To generate risk events from logs.
D.To update the asset and identity table.
AnswerA

This correlation search aggregates per-object risk scores and fires a notable when the accumulated total crosses the configured risk threshold, satisfying the requirement to surface objects whose risk has escalated. It does not itself assign risk; it evaluates the summed score against the threshold.

Why this answer

The Risk Notable correlation search in Splunk ES aggregates risk events per risk object and fires a notable when the summed risk score crosses a configured threshold. Its purpose is to convert accumulated risk into an actionable notable event for analysts, rather than to generate the underlying risk events themselves. This is the bridge between the risk framework and the Incident Review queue.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests whether candidates confuse 'generating risk events' with 'alerting on accumulated risk' — the trap is picking the answer that describes risk generation instead of threshold-based notabling.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because clearing old risk events is handled by the risk index retention/rollup and the 'Risk Analysis' adaptive response or the risk framework's data retention settings, not by the Risk Notable search. Option C is wrong because generating risk events from logs is the job of risk-generating correlation searches (e.g., those using the 'risk' action or the Risk Analysis framework), not the Risk Notable search. Option D is wrong because asset and identity table updates are performed by the asset/identity lookup generators and the 'Identity Resolution' / 'Asset Lookup' searches, not by Risk Notable.

261
MCQhard

When dealing with multi-value fields, which command allows you to break them into individual events?

A.expand field_name
B.mvexpand field_name
C.mv_to_events field_name
D.split field_name
AnswerB

`mvexpand` takes each value within a multi-value field and creates a separate event for it, directly satisfying the requirement to split values into individual events. Unlike `mvcombine`, which merges values, or `nomv`, which flattens a field into a single string, `mvexpand` preserves each value as its own event.

Why this answer

The mvexpand command takes a multi-value field and expands each value into its own separate event, duplicating the other fields for each value. This is the standard SPL command for breaking multi-value fields into individual events, and it is commonly used before further aggregation or correlation.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests the difference between commands that create multi-value fields (split, makemv) and commands that expand them (mvexpand) — candidates pick split because it sounds like it separates values, but it does the opposite.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A (expand field_name) is wrong because there is no 'expand' command in SPL; the correct command is mvexpand. Option C (mv_to_events field_name) is wrong because no such command exists in Splunk — it is a fabricated name that sounds plausible. Option D (split field_name) is wrong because split is an eval function that splits a single string into a multi-value field, which is the opposite of what the question asks (it creates multi-value fields rather than expanding them into events).

262
MCQeasy

What is the purpose of the 'Incident Review' dashboard in Splunk ES?

A.To triage and manage notable events.
B.To manage threat intelligence feeds.
C.To configure data model acceleration.
D.To view real-time system health.
AnswerA

The Incident Review dashboard is the primary triage workspace in Splunk Enterprise Security, letting analysts assign, prioritise and track notable events through their lifecycle. It satisfies the stem's focus on purpose by centralising notable event management, rather than providing correlation search configuration or data model acceleration.

Why this answer

The Incident Review dashboard in Splunk Enterprise Security is the central triage workspace where analysts review, prioritize, and act on notable events generated by correlation searches. It provides filtering, sorting, and bulk actions so analysts can manage their queue efficiently. This makes 'triage and manage notable events' the correct purpose.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests the boundary between Incident Review (triage of notables) and other ES dashboards like Threat Intelligence or Health, causing candidates to confuse the triage workspace with configuration or monitoring pages.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option B is wrong because threat intelligence feeds are managed through the Threat Intelligence framework and the Threat Intelligence Management page, not Incident Review. Option C is wrong because data model acceleration is configured under Settings > Data Models or via the Data Model Acceleration management page. Option D is wrong because real-time system health is monitored through the Monitoring Console or the Health dashboard, not Incident Review.

263
MCQhard

An analyst is building a risk rule that assigns a risk score to a user based on the number of failed authentication attempts observed in a 10-minute window. The analyst wants the risk score to increase proportionally with the number of failures, but also wants to avoid generating excessive risk events for every single failure. Which approach best meets these requirements?

A.Use the 'collect' command to write a single aggregated risk event per user per hour with a fixed score.
B.Use a threshold-based correlation search that triggers once when the count exceeds a static threshold.
C.Calculate a risk score using a formula that multiplies the failure count by a weight, and apply the risk modifier via the risk score field in the correlation search.
D.Create one correlation search per failed authentication event and assign a fixed risk score to each.
AnswerC

Using a formula that multiplies the count by a weight lets the risk score scale with the number of failures. By applying this as the risk score in a single correlation search per user per window, the analyst avoids emitting a risk event for every failure while still capturing proportionality. This directly satisfies both the scaling and event-reduction requirements.

Why this answer

To achieve proportionality without event flooding, the correlation search should aggregate failures per user over the window and compute a risk score using a formula that scales with the count. Assigning that computed value as the risk score in a single risk event per user per window meets both goals. Per-event scoring floods the risk index, while static thresholds or fixed-score aggregations lose proportionality.

Exam trap

The trap here is believing that a threshold-based search automatically scales the risk score with the count, when it actually assigns a fixed score.

264
Multi-Selectmedium

Which TWO types of events are typically categorized as 'Notable Events'?

Select 2 answers
A.Events produced by the license master.
B.Manually created incidents in Incident Review.
C.Every log event received by the indexer.
D.Events generated by a correlation search.
E.Browser history of a user.
AnswersB, D

Analysts can manually create incidents in Incident Review, and these are stored and treated as notable events alongside correlation search output. This satisfies the requirement by covering the human-generated category, distinguishing it from automated detections and ordinary indexed events.

Why this answer

Option B is correct because manually created incidents in Incident Review are user-generated notable events; when an analyst creates an incident in Splunk Enterprise Security's Incident Review, it is stored as a notable event in the notable index and tracked through the investigation workflow. Option D is correct because correlation searches are the primary mechanism that generates notable events in Splunk ES; when a correlation search's triggering condition is met, it writes a notable event to the notable index for review in Incident Review. Option A is incorrect because the license master produces licensing-related internal messages (e.g., license violations or pool usage warnings), not notable events.

Option C is incorrect because ordinary log events received by the indexer are raw indexed data, not notable events, unless a correlation search or manual action promotes them. Option E is incorrect because a user's browser history is endpoint/web data that would only become notable if a correlation search flagged it, not by its nature.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests the misconception that all indexed events or license events are notables, when notables are specifically correlation-search-generated or manually created incidents.

265
MCQmedium

Which command is used to remove duplicate events based on a field?

A.remove_duplicates event_id
B.distinct event_id
C.unique event_id
D.dedup event_id
AnswerD

`dedup event_id` removes duplicate events by comparing values in the specified field, retaining only the first occurrence of each unique event_id. This directly satisfies the requirement to eliminate duplicates based on a field, unlike commands that merely group or count events without discarding the redundant copies.

Why this answer

The dedup command removes duplicate events based on the specified field(s), keeping only the first occurrence (or a specified number with the keepevents/sortby options). 'dedup event_id' is the correct syntax to deduplicate events sharing the same event_id value. This is a core SPL command for reducing redundant results.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests whether candidates know the exact SPL command name — the trap is picking plausible-sounding but non-existent commands like 'unique', 'distinct', or 'remove_duplicates' instead of the real 'dedup'.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because 'remove_duplicates' is not a valid SPL command — no such command exists in Splunk. Option B is wrong because 'distinct' is not a valid SPL command; the closest concept is 'dedup' or using 'stats dc()' for counting distinct values. Option C is wrong because 'unique' is not a valid SPL command either — Splunk uses dedup, not unique, for this purpose.

266
MCQmedium

An analyst notices a Windows workstation repeatedly resolving long, random-looking subdomains under a single parent domain, followed by outbound DNS TXT queries. Which Splunk ES detection method is most appropriate to identify this as DNS tunneling?

A.Use the Endpoint data model to look for process execution of signed system binaries that spawn child processes outside their normal parent.
B.Use the Authentication data model to count failed logons per hour and trigger an alert when the count exceeds a baseline.
C.Use the Web data model to search for HTTP POST requests containing base64-encoded parameters sent to a small set of external IPs.
D.Use the Network_Traffic data model with a search that aggregates the length of DNS query names and the count of unique subdomains per parent domain, then apply a threshold-based correlation search.
AnswerD

This works because DNS tunneling relies on unusually long, high-entropy query names and many unique subdomains to a single parent. Aggregating query name length and unique subdomain counts in the Network_Traffic data model surfaces that pattern, and a correlation search can alert on thresholds, which is exactly how Splunk ES commonly detects this behavior.

Why this answer

DNS tunneling encodes data in query names and record types, producing long, random-looking subdomains and frequent TXT queries to one parent domain. The Network_Traffic data model holds DNS events and supports aggregation of query name length and unique subdomain counts per parent, making a threshold-based correlation search the reliable way to flag this behavior.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming any high-volume DNS activity indicates tunneling, when the defining signal is query name length and unique subdomain count to a single parent, not raw query volume.

267
MCQhard

In the context of the NIST CSF 'Identify' function, which Splunk functionality is most appropriate for maintaining a current list of authorized software?

A.Index-time field extraction.
B.Correlation search thresholding.
C.Dynamic Threat Intelligence updates.
D.Asset and Identity framework using lookup tables.
AnswerD

The Asset and Identity framework ingests lookup tables to maintain an authoritative, current inventory of authorised software and associated assets. Within the Identify function, this supports asset management and governance by keeping the software list accurate and queryable.

Why this answer

The Asset and Identity framework in Splunk ES uses lookup tables to maintain authoritative records of assets (hardware, software, systems) and identities (users). For maintaining a current list of authorized software, the asset lookup table can include software inventory fields, and the framework supports scheduled updates from external sources. This aligns with the NIST CSF Identify function's goal of maintaining an inventory of authorized software (ID.AM-2).

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests the mapping of Splunk ES features to NIST CSF functions — candidates confuse detection-oriented features (correlation searches, threat intel) with Identify-function capabilities (asset and identity management) because both are part of the ES platform.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because index-time field extraction is a data parsing technique that extracts fields as data is indexed — it does not maintain a list of authorized software or support the asset management use case. Option B is wrong because correlation search thresholding is used to trigger alerts when event counts exceed a threshold — it is a detection mechanism, not an inventory management tool. Option C is wrong because Dynamic Threat Intelligence updates are used to ingest threat feeds for detection — they are relevant to the Detect function, not the Identify function's asset management requirements.

268
Multi-Selecteasy

Which TWO of the following are primary indicators of a phishing attack that you should look for in email logs?

Select 2 answers
A.Suspicious URL in email body
B.Successful authentication
C.High CPU usage on server
D.Unusual printer activity
E.Unexpected sender domain
AnswersA, E

Email logs capture embedded links, so extracting and inspecting URLs reveals mismatched or spoofed destinations that legitimate senders would not use. A suspicious URL in the email body is therefore a primary phishing indicator detectable directly from the URL field within mail telemetry.

Why this answer

Option A (Suspicious URL in email body) is correct because phishing emails typically contain links to spoofed or malicious domains designed to harvest credentials or deliver malware, and these URLs are visible in email gateway or mail server logs as embedded hyperlinks that can be inspected for mismatched display text, URL shorteners, or known-bad domains. Option E (Unexpected sender domain) is correct because phishing often originates from look-alike or typosquatted domains (e.g., micros0ft.com) or compromised legitimate accounts, and analyzing the envelope sender and From header domains in email logs reveals these anomalies through SPF, DKIM, and DMARC failures. Option B (Successful authentication) is not a phishing indicator; it is a normal event that could occur after a user is tricked, but by itself it does not indicate phishing.

Option C (High CPU usage on server) relates to resource consumption or malware/DoS activity, not to email-based phishing indicators. Option D (Unusual printer activity) is unrelated to phishing and would more likely indicate insider activity or a print server issue.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests the distinction between email-layer indicators (sender domain, URLs, headers) and unrelated system metrics (CPU, printers) — candidates may over-select generic 'suspicious activity' options that aren't phishing-specific.

269
Multi-Selecteasy

Which TWO types of data are commonly enriched by the Asset and Identity framework?

Select 2 answers
A.Host/Asset context
B.Encrypted packet captures
C.User identity information
D.Raw web server application logs
E.System performance statistics
AnswersA, C

The framework enriches events with host and asset context, including hostname, IP address, operating system and asset priority pulled from asset lookup tables. This satisfies the requirement by attaching device metadata to raw events, so detections and risk scoring can evaluate the originating host.

Why this answer

The Asset and Identity framework in Splunk ES is designed to correlate events with contextual metadata about hosts and users, so option A (Host/Asset context) is correct because it enriches events with asset attributes such as IP, MAC, hostname, priority, and business unit. Option C (User identity information) is also correct because the framework enriches events with identity attributes like user name, email, department, and role, enabling risk scoring and correlation. Options B, D, and E are not part of the framework's enrichment: encrypted packet captures are raw network data, raw web server application logs are source events rather than enrichment lookups, and system performance statistics are metrics not typically provided by asset or identity lookups.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests the confusion between data enrichment types, tricking candidates into selecting raw log types or performance metrics instead of the contextual asset and identity data.

270
Multi-Selectmedium

Which TWO Splunk features are best for automating the execution of recurring threat hunts?

Select 2 answers
A.Data Model Acceleration
B.Scheduled Searches
C.User Roles
D.Alert Actions
E.Splunk Web Framework
AnswersB, D

Scheduled Searches run saved hunt queries automatically at defined intervals, removing manual re-execution. This directly satisfies the stem's recurring automation requirement by dispatching detections continuously, with results available for review or downstream alerting without analyst intervention.

Why this answer

Scheduled Searches (B) are correct because they let you run a saved search automatically on a cron-based schedule, which is exactly how recurring threat hunts are executed without manual intervention. Alert Actions (D) are correct because they attach automated responses to triggered alerts, such as running a script, sending an email, or invoking a webhook, enabling the hunt to act on findings automatically. Data Model Acceleration (A) only speeds up searches against data models; it does not schedule or automate hunt execution.

User Roles (C) govern access permissions and capabilities, not recurring task automation. Splunk Web Framework (E) is a development toolkit for building custom apps and dashboards, not a scheduling or automation mechanism for recurring hunts.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests the distinction between features that accelerate or visualize searches (Data Model Acceleration, dashboards) and features that actually automate recurring execution (Scheduled Searches plus Alert Actions), so candidates who pick acceleration features fall into the trap.

271
MCQhard

During a hunt for compromised accounts, you want to distinguish a legitimate helpdesk password reset from an attacker resetting credentials to retain access. Which correlation of events in Splunk would best support that distinction?

A.Correlate Event ID 4688 process creation with Event ID 5156 network connection allowed and group by parent process
B.Correlate Event ID 4724 (password reset attempt) with the initiating account and compare the target account's subsequent logon source IPs against its historical baseline
C.Correlate Event ID 4768 with Event ID 4769 and count ticket requests per account within a five-minute window
D.Correlate Event ID 4624 logon type 3 with Event ID 4672 special privileges assigned and group by destination host
AnswerB

Event ID 4724 records a password reset attempt and identifies the account performing the reset. Correlating the reset actor with the target account's later logon locations reveals whether the target then authenticates from unfamiliar addresses, a strong indicator of attacker-driven resets for access retention. Comparing against the target's historical source IP baseline separates routine helpdesk activity from abuse.

Why this answer

Password reset activity is captured by Event ID 4724, which includes the account performing the reset. The key discriminator is what happens next: if the target account subsequently authenticates from source addresses outside its historical pattern, the reset likely served attacker access retention rather than routine support. Correlating the reset actor with the target's later logon geography turns a benign-looking event into a defensible finding.

Exam trap

The trap here is focusing on authentication volume events, which describe tickets and logons, instead of the specific event that records who performed a password reset.

272
MCQeasy

A security analyst is documenting the lifecycle of an investigation in Splunk Enterprise Security. Which statement accurately describes how cases and notables relate within that lifecycle?

A.A notable can be added to a case, and a single case can contain multiple notables and associated events.
B.A case is automatically created for every notable event generated by a correlation search.
C.Closing a case automatically closes all notables that were added to it, preventing further review.
D.Notables and cases are stored in the same index and are distinguished only by their source type.
AnswerA

Cases in Splunk Enterprise Security are investigative containers that can hold multiple notables, events, and artifacts. Analysts add relevant notables to a case to group related findings. This reflects the intended workflow: triage notables, then consolidate related ones into a case for coordinated investigation, evidence gathering, and documentation.

Why this answer

Cases serve as containers for investigations and can include multiple notables along with related events and artifacts. Analysts add notables to a case to group related findings, enabling coordinated analysis, evidence collection, and documentation. This relationship supports the workflow of triaging individual notables and then consolidating related ones into a single investigative record.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming notables and cases have a one-to-one automatic relationship, when cases are manually curated containers that can hold many notables.

273
MCQeasy

During a threat hunt for data exfiltration, you want to identify endpoints that transferred an unusually large volume of data to external IP addresses compared to their normal baseline. Which Splunk approach best accomplishes this using the Network_Traffic data model?

A.Search for DNS queries to newly registered domains and assume any resolution indicates exfiltration.
B.Run a raw search over index=firewall and manually review the top talkers by bytes for the past hour.
C.Create an alert that fires whenever any host sends more than 1 GB in an hour, regardless of its typical usage.
D.Use tstats to compute per-host outbound bytes from Network_Traffic.All_Traffic, then compare each host's recent total to its historical average and flag significant deviations.
AnswerD

This approach uses the accelerated data model for efficient aggregation, computes outbound volume per host, and compares recent activity against a historical baseline. Flagging deviations above normal behavior isolates hosts whose transfer volume is anomalous for them, which is precisely the signal of potential exfiltration.

Why this answer

Exfiltration detection hinges on identifying hosts whose outbound transfer volume deviates from their own historical norm. Aggregating bytes per host through the accelerated Network_Traffic data model and comparing recent totals to a baseline surfaces those deviations efficiently, while static thresholds or unrelated DNS signals fail to capture the volume anomaly.

Exam trap

The trap here is applying a fixed byte threshold across all hosts instead of comparing each host against its own established baseline.

274
MCQmedium

You are a security analyst using Splunk Enterprise Security (ES) to map detections to the MITRE ATT&CK framework. Your CISO wants to understand which ATT&CK tactic is most directly addressed by the correlation search that detects suspicious PowerShell execution with encoded commands (T1059.001). Under which ATT&CK tactic should you classify this detection?

A.Persistence
B.Defense Evasion
C.Execution
D.Initial Access
AnswerC

This detection focuses on the actual running of malicious code via PowerShell, which falls under the Execution tactic. MITRE ATT&CK defines Execution as techniques that result in adversary-controlled code running on a local or remote system. Encoded PowerShell commands are a classic example of T1059.001, and Splunk ES maps such detections to Execution to help analysts understand the adversary's operational phase.

Why this answer

The detection of suspicious PowerShell execution with encoded commands directly aligns with the Execution tactic, as it signifies adversary-controlled code running on a system. MITRE ATT&CK technique T1059.001 is explicitly categorized under Execution, and Splunk ES uses this mapping to help analysts prioritize and contextualize alerts. Classifying it under other tactics would inaccurately reflect the adversary's current phase.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing the method of execution (encoded commands) with the tactic of Defense Evasion, when the core action is code execution.

275
MCQhard

You are building a correlation search that must trigger a notable event when a user's risk score exceeds 100 within a 24-hour period. The risk score is calculated from multiple risk events across different indexes. Which Splunk ES component should you use to aggregate the risk events and evaluate the threshold?

A.Threat Intelligence framework with a lookup of known malicious users
B.Risk Analysis framework with a correlation search using the 'risk' index
C.Incident Review dashboard with a custom filter for risk score
D.Data Model acceleration on the Risk data model
AnswerB

The Risk Analysis framework in Splunk ES collects risk events from various sources into the 'risk' index. A correlation search can then search the 'risk' index, aggregate risk scores by user, and trigger a notable when the threshold is exceeded. This is the intended use of the framework, which provides a centralized way to manage risk-based alerting. The correlation search should use the 'risk' index and sum the risk_score field.

Why this answer

The Risk Analysis framework is designed to collect risk events into the 'risk' index, where they can be aggregated and analyzed. A correlation search can then query the 'risk' index, sum risk scores by user over a 24-hour window, and trigger a notable when the total exceeds 100. This approach leverages the built-in risk framework and is the correct way to implement risk-based alerting in Splunk ES.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that data model acceleration or threat intelligence is needed, but the core requirement is to use the Risk Analysis framework and search the 'risk' index to aggregate scores and trigger notables.

276
MCQmedium

When configuring a risk-based correlation search, what is the primary purpose of the 'Risk Analysis' adaptive response action?

A.To purge malicious events from the index.
B.To attribute risk to a specific object, such as a user or system.
C.To notify the SOC manager via email.
D.To automatically block the offending IP address on the firewall.
AnswerB

The Risk Analysis adaptive response action writes a risk event to the risk index, recording a risk score against a named risk object such as a user, host or system. This attribution lets subsequent risk notables aggregate and prioritise by entity.

Why this answer

The Risk Analysis adaptive response action in a correlation search is used to attribute risk to a specific object (such as a user, system, or IP) by adding a risk score and risk message to that object. This feeds into the risk-based alerting framework, allowing ES to accumulate risk and generate notables when thresholds are exceeded.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests the confusion between adaptive response actions — candidates may pick email notification or firewall blocking when the question specifically asks about attributing risk to an object.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because adaptive response actions cannot purge events from the index; data deletion is handled by index retention policies or the delete command with appropriate permissions. Option C is wrong because notifying the SOC manager is typically done via the 'Send Email' adaptive response action, not Risk Analysis. Option D is wrong because blocking an IP on a firewall would require a custom adaptive response action or integration (e.g., with a firewall vendor), not the built-in Risk Analysis action.

277
MCQhard

You need to ensure that your Splunk ES environment is properly ingesting threat intelligence data. Where can you confirm that threat sources are active?

A.Configure > Data Inputs
B.Configure > Threat Intelligence > Threat Sources
C.Dashboard > Threat Intelligence
D.Configure > Content Management
AnswerB

The Threat Sources page lists every configured intelligence feed with its status, letting you verify which sources are enabled and actively contributing indicators. It is the definitive location for confirming ingestion health, satisfying the requirement to check that threat sources are active.

Why this answer

In Splunk Enterprise Security, threat intelligence sources are configured and monitored under Configure > Threat Intelligence > Threat Sources. This page lists all configured intelligence sources, their status (enabled/disabled), last update time, and any errors, allowing you to confirm active ingestion. It is the authoritative location for verifying threat feed health.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests confusion between the Threat Intelligence dashboard (which shows matches) and the Threat Sources configuration page (which shows source health) — candidates pick the dashboard thinking it confirms ingestion.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because Configure > Data Inputs manages generic data ingestion (files, ports, scripts) but does not show threat intelligence source status or health. Option C is wrong because the Threat Intelligence dashboard displays matches and intelligence activity, not the configuration or active status of sources. Option D is wrong because Configure > Content Management handles ES content (correlation searches, dashboards) deployment, not threat feed configuration.

278
MCQhard

You are auditing logs and find that a user has modified an audit policy using 'auditpol.exe'. Which Splunk CIM data model should contain this information?

A.Network Traffic
B.Change Analysis
C.Endpoint
D.Authentication
AnswerB

Change Analysis tracks modifications to system configuration and policy objects, including audit policy changes made via auditpol.exe. Its Change data model captures the object affected, the action taken and the user responsible, satisfying the stem's requirement to locate audit-policy modification events within Splunk's Common Information Model.

Why this answer

The Change Analysis CIM data model is designed to capture changes to system configuration, including audit policy modifications. When auditpol.exe is used to alter audit policies, the resulting Windows Security event (typically Event ID 4719, 'System audit policy was changed') maps to Change Analysis via fields like object, change_type, and user. Network Traffic, Endpoint, and Authentication models do not represent configuration-change events.

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests whether candidates pick Endpoint for auditpol.exe activity because the tool runs on the endpoint — but the CIM classifies the resulting policy change under Change Analysis, not Endpoint.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A (Network Traffic) is wrong because it models flow-level network metadata, not local configuration changes. Option C (Endpoint) is wrong because although auditpol.exe runs on the endpoint, the resulting audit-policy change event is a configuration change, which the CIM maps to Change Analysis rather than Endpoint's process datasets. Option D (Authentication) is wrong because it only covers logon/logoff events, not policy modifications.

279
MCQeasy

A security analyst receives a notable event about suspicious PowerShell execution on a workstation. To gather more context, the analyst wants to see all events related to the involved host from the last 24 hours in a single view. Which Splunk ES feature provides this consolidated timeline of activity for an entity?

A.Incident Review
B.Threat Intelligence framework
C.Risk Analysis dashboard
D.Asset Investigator
AnswerD

Asset Investigator provides a consolidated timeline of events and risk-related activity for a specific asset, such as a host or IP address. It aggregates data from multiple sources to give the analyst a unified view of what happened on that entity. This is the appropriate tool for examining all recent activity related to the workstation in question.

Why this answer

Asset Investigator is designed to show a unified timeline of events and risk activity for a specific asset, making it ideal for examining all recent activity on a host. Other ES features like Incident Review, Threat Intelligence, and Risk Analysis serve different purposes and do not provide the same consolidated entity view.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing the risk-focused dashboard with the entity-focused investigator; the Risk Analysis dashboard shows scores, not the full event timeline for a host.

280
MCQeasy

Which of the following best describes the goal of the 'Exploitation' phase in the Cyber Kill Chain?

A.Establishing a persistent connection to the attacker.
B.Executing code to take advantage of a vulnerability.
C.Exfiltrating sensitive company data.
D.Gathering information about the target.
AnswerB

Exploitation is the phase where an attacker leverages a discovered weakness by running code or a crafted payload against it, turning a vulnerability into actual access or execution. It follows weaponisation and delivery, and precedes installation, so its defining goal is triggering the flaw to gain a foothold.

Why this answer

The Exploitation phase of the Cyber Kill Chain is when the attacker's weaponized payload triggers the vulnerability and executes code on the victim's system. This is the moment the malicious code runs and takes advantage of a software flaw (e.g., a buffer overflow, deserialization bug, or macro execution). It is distinct from Delivery (transmitting the payload) and Installation (establishing persistence).

Exam trap

SPLK-5001 often tests whether candidates can distinguish Exploitation (code execution against a vulnerability) from Installation (persistence) and C2 (beaconing) — the trap is picking persistence or exfiltration when the question asks about the exploitation moment.

How to eliminate wrong answers

Option A is wrong because establishing a persistent connection to the attacker describes the Command and Control (C2) phase, where the compromised host beacons out to attacker infrastructure. Option C is wrong because exfiltrating sensitive data is the Actions on Objectives phase — the final goal after the attacker has established persistence and C2. Option D is wrong because gathering information about the target is the Reconnaissance phase, which occurs before weaponization and delivery.

281
MCQeasy

A SOC manager wants to ensure that when a notable event is reviewed and closed, the analyst's disposition and any supporting evidence are preserved for audit purposes. Which Splunk ES feature should the manager use to capture this information?

A.The `_internal` index, which logs all notable event status changes and comments.
B.The Search & Reporting app's saved search history for the correlation search that generated the notable.
C.The Audit trail in Splunk ES settings, which records all configuration changes to correlation searches.
D.Notable event comments and status updates in the Incident Review dashboard.
AnswerD

Incident Review allows analysts to add comments, change status, and assign ownership directly on notable events. These updates are stored with the notable and provide an audit trail of the disposition and supporting notes. This is the built-in mechanism for documenting review outcomes and evidence within Splunk ES.

Why this answer

Incident Review is the central place where analysts document their investigation of notable events. Comments, status changes, and ownership updates are stored with the notable, creating an audit trail of the disposition and evidence. This satisfies the requirement to preserve review outcomes for audit purposes without additional tooling.

Exam trap

The trap here is assuming that internal logs or search history serve as the audit record, when the notable event's own review fields are the authoritative source.

282
MCQhard

A SOC analyst is building a risk-based alerting workflow and wants to ensure that a specific risk rule only contributes to an entity's risk score when the entity is a user account, not a system or IP address. Which configuration in the risk rule's search definition accomplishes this?

A.Set the 'risk_score' field to zero for non-user entities
B.Set the 'risk_object_type' field to 'user' in the risk event
C.Configure the risk rule to use the 'Identity' data model as its primary source
D.Add a where clause filtering on the 'user' field being non-null
AnswerB

The risk_object_type field identifies the kind of entity the risk applies to, such as user, system, or other. By explicitly setting it to 'user', the risk event is attributed only to user entities, preventing the same rule from inflating risk scores for systems or IPs. This is the correct way to scope a risk rule to a specific entity type.

Why this answer

Risk events carry a risk_object_type field that declares whether the risk applies to a user, system, or other entity. Setting it to 'user' ensures the rule only contributes to user risk scores. Filtering on fields or choosing a data model does not constrain the entity type, and zeroing scores still generates unwanted risk events.

Exam trap

The trap here is believing that filtering on a user field or selecting a user-centric data model automatically scopes risk to user entities, when only risk_object_type controls that attribution.

283
MCQmedium

A Splunk ES analyst is investigating an alert for a suspicious PowerShell script execution. The alert is mapped to MITRE ATT&CK technique T1059.001 (PowerShell). To gather more context, the analyst wants to search for related events across multiple data sources. Which Splunk ES feature should they use to pivot from the alert to relevant events?

A.Asset and Identity Framework
B.Incident Review
C.Threat Intelligence Framework
D.Protocol Intelligence
AnswerB

Incident Review in Splunk ES provides a centralized view of notables and allows analysts to drill down into associated events. It enables pivoting to raw events, asset information, and threat intelligence. This is the correct feature for investigating an alert and gathering context from multiple data sources.

Why this answer

Incident Review is the Splunk ES feature that allows analysts to examine notables and pivot to associated events. It provides a drill-down capability to view raw events, asset context, and threat intelligence, enabling comprehensive investigation of an alert. Other features like Threat Intelligence Framework, Asset and Identity Framework, and Protocol Intelligence serve different purposes and do not provide the same pivot functionality.

Exam trap

The trap here is confusing Threat Intelligence Framework with investigation tools; while it provides indicators, it does not allow pivoting from an alert to raw events.

Page 3

Page 4 of 4

All pages