POPM Product Owner and Product Management Roles Practice Question
If a team's velocity is consistently lower than the forecasted capacity during PI planning, what should the Product Owner do?
⚠ Common exam trap
Candidates often suggest pressuring the team to 'improve' or 'work harder' to reach the forecast. The PO must accept reality and adjust the plan to match actual capacity.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Adjust the scope and prioritize the backlog to match the team's historical velocity.
The PO must adjust the scope of the plan to match the team's actual capacity. By focusing on the most valuable features and negotiating a realistic scope, the PO ensures the team can achieve their commitments. This prevents the team from over-promising and under-delivering, which is vital for building trust with stakeholders and maintaining a healthy, sustainable development pace within the SAFe framework.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Pressure the team to work overtime to meet the original capacity.
Why it's wrong here
Pressuring the team leads to burnout and a decline in quality. Sustainable development is a core Agile principle. The PO should instead adjust expectations and scope to reflect the team's true, predictable velocity, ensuring that commitments are met without sacrificing the well-being of the developers or the quality of the product.
- ✓
Adjust the scope and prioritize the backlog to match the team's historical velocity.
Why this is correct
Adjusting the scope to align with actual velocity is the most professional and realistic approach. It allows the team to deliver high-quality work without being overwhelmed. By prioritizing the most critical items, the PO ensures that even with lower capacity, the team delivers maximum value to the customer.
- ✗
Ask the Product Manager to assign more features to the team to compensate.
Why it's wrong here
Assigning more work to a team that is already struggling with capacity will only worsen the situation. It increases the probability of incomplete features and failed objectives. The focus should be on realistic planning and value delivery, not just loading the team with more work than they can handle.
- ✗
Ignore the velocity and continue to commit to the original plan.
Why it's wrong here
Committing to a plan that is known to be unattainable is dishonest and destructive to stakeholder trust. It forces the team into a state of chronic failure. The PO must act transparently and adjust the commitment to reflect the team's actual, demonstrated capacity to deliver consistently over time.
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every POPM question from scratch — 336 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Scaled Agile exam blueprint
This POPM practice question is part of Courseiva's free Scaled Agile certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the POPM exam.