POPM PI Planning Preparation Practice Question
A Product Manager is preparing for PI Planning and learns that a key dependency feature will be delivered by another ART. The other ART's PI dates are offset by two weeks. What should the Product Manager do to prepare for PI Planning?
⚠ Common exam trap
The trap here is treating a cross-ART schedule offset as something to resolve during the event rather than as a pre-PI planning assumption.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Document the dependency and the offset dates as a planning assumption, and coordinate with the other Product Manager before PI Planning.
Cross-ART dependencies with schedule offsets must be surfaced before PI Planning. The Product Manager prepares by coordinating with the other Product Manager and documenting the offset as a planning assumption. This lets teams plan realistic sequencing and mitigations. Ignoring, removing, or deferring the dependency to the event leaves the ART planning against assumptions that will not hold.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Assume the other ART will deliver on time and plan the dependent feature as if the dates were aligned.
Why it's wrong here
Ignoring a two-week offset creates a false assumption that will likely break the plan during execution. PI Planning is meant to expose dependencies, not hide them behind optimistic assumptions. The Product Manager should coordinate and document the offset so teams can plan mitigations or resequence work.
- ✗
Remove the dependent feature from the Program Backlog so the ART does not plan work it cannot control.
Why it's wrong here
Removing the feature avoids the dependency but may also remove value the ART is expected to deliver. The Product Manager's role is to manage the dependency, not eliminate it from the backlog. With proper coordination and a planning assumption, the feature can still be planned with realistic sequencing.
- ✓
Document the dependency and the offset dates as a planning assumption, and coordinate with the other Product Manager before PI Planning.
Why this is correct
Cross-ART dependencies and schedule offsets are exactly the kind of constraint that must be surfaced before PI Planning. Coordinating with the other Product Manager lets both ARTs plan around the offset and agree on delivery expectations. Documenting it as a planning assumption ensures teams see the risk and can sequence their work accordingly.
- ✗
Ask the Release Train Engineer to resolve the dependency during PI Planning without involving the other ART.
Why it's wrong here
The Release Train Engineer facilitates PI Planning and dependency management, but a cross-ART schedule offset requires coordination with the other ART's leadership. Waiting until the event to address it leaves teams planning without critical information. The Product Manager should prepare by engaging the other Product Manager beforehand.
About these practice questions
Courseiva writes every POPM question from scratch — 336 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
JA
Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security
Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva
Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Scaled Agile exam blueprint
This POPM practice question is part of Courseiva's free Scaled Agile certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the POPM exam.