- A
The user can edit the document but cannot delete it.
Why wrong: This describes the behavior of a standard record label, not a regulatory record. Standard records allow editing but block deletion.
- B
The user cannot edit or delete the document.
Regulatory records are immutable; neither editing nor deletion is permitted, regardless of permissions.
- C
The user can edit the document if they have edit permissions, and any changes are recorded in the audit log.
Why wrong: This is true for a retention label that does not mark the content as a record, but regulatory record labels block edits entirely.
- D
The user can edit the document only after obtaining a legal hold.
Why wrong: A legal hold preserves content for legal purposes but does not grant permission to edit a regulatory record. The regulatory record restriction overrides any edit permissions.
SC-900 Practice Question: Describe the capabilities of Microsoft compliance solutions
This SC-900 practice question tests your understanding of describe the capabilities of microsoft compliance solutions. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A company uses Microsoft Purview to manage data lifecycle. They configure a retention label that marks content as a regulatory record and apply it to sensitive documents. A user with edit permissions attempts to modify a document that has this label applied. What will be the outcome?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
The user cannot edit or delete the document.
When a retention label is configured as a regulatory record, it enforces the strictest retention and disposition controls. Regulatory records are immutable by design; once applied, no user—regardless of permissions—can edit or delete the content. This is because the label locks the document to prevent any modification or deletion until the retention period expires and a disposition review is completed.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
The user can edit the document but cannot delete it.
Why it's wrong here
This describes the behavior of a standard record label, not a regulatory record. Standard records allow editing but block deletion.
When this WOULD be correct
If the label were a standard retention label (not a regulatory record) with a retention action that only prevents deletion but allows edits, then users with edit permissions could modify the document but not delete it.
- ✓
The user cannot edit or delete the document.
Why this is correct
Regulatory records are immutable; neither editing nor deletion is permitted, regardless of permissions.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- ✗
The user can edit the document if they have edit permissions, and any changes are recorded in the audit log.
Why it's wrong here
This is true for a retention label that does not mark the content as a record, but regulatory record labels block edits entirely.
When this WOULD be correct
This option would be correct if the question described a standard retention label (not a regulatory record) that only blocks deletion but allows edits, with audit logging enabled for changes.
- ✗
The user can edit the document only after obtaining a legal hold.
Why it's wrong here
A legal hold preserves content for legal purposes but does not grant permission to edit a regulatory record. The regulatory record restriction overrides any edit permissions.
When this WOULD be correct
In a scenario where a document is under a legal hold (e.g., via eDiscovery hold) but not labeled as a regulatory record, a user with edit permissions might be able to edit the document only after the legal hold is removed, as the hold prevents deletion but not necessarily editing.
Option-by-option analysis
Why each answer is right or wrong
Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The SC-900 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.
✓The user cannot edit or delete the document.Correct answer▾
Why this is correct
Regulatory records are immutable; neither editing nor deletion is permitted, regardless of permissions.
✗The user can edit the document but cannot delete it.Wrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
Regulatory records are immutable; once applied, users cannot edit or delete the content, regardless of permissions. Option A incorrectly suggests editing is allowed.
★ When this WOULD be the correct answer
If the label were a standard retention label (not a regulatory record) with a retention action that only prevents deletion but allows edits, then users with edit permissions could modify the document but not delete it.
Why candidates choose this
Candidates may confuse regulatory records with standard retention labels, assuming that edit permissions override retention settings, or they may think deletion is the only restricted action.
✗The user can edit the document if they have edit permissions, and any changes are recorded in the audit log.Wrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
A regulatory record label in Microsoft Purview locks content, preventing any edits or deletions by users, even those with edit permissions. Option C incorrectly suggests edits are allowed and only logged.
★ When this WOULD be the correct answer
This option would be correct if the question described a standard retention label (not a regulatory record) that only blocks deletion but allows edits, with audit logging enabled for changes.
Why candidates choose this
Candidates may confuse regulatory records with standard retention labels, assuming that edit permissions override retention policies and that audit logging is the primary control mechanism.
✗The user can edit the document only after obtaining a legal hold.Wrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
A regulatory record label in Microsoft Purview imposes strict immutability: content cannot be edited or deleted by any user, regardless of permissions. Legal hold is a separate mechanism for preserving content during litigation, not a prerequisite for editing regulatory records.
★ When this WOULD be the correct answer
In a scenario where a document is under a legal hold (e.g., via eDiscovery hold) but not labeled as a regulatory record, a user with edit permissions might be able to edit the document only after the legal hold is removed, as the hold prevents deletion but not necessarily editing.
Why candidates choose this
Candidates may confuse legal hold with retention labels, assuming that legal hold imposes similar restrictions on editing, or they may think that regulatory records require additional steps like legal hold before modification is allowed.
Analysis generated from the official SC-900blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates confuse 'regulatory record' with a standard retention label or a legal hold, assuming that edit permissions or audit logging still allow changes, when in fact regulatory records enforce complete immutability.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Under the hood, a regulatory record label in Microsoft Purview uses a 'locked' policy that sets the 'BlockEdit' and 'BlockDelete' properties at the item level in SharePoint or OneDrive. This is enforced by the compliance engine, which intercepts any write or delete operations and returns an access denied error, regardless of the user's SharePoint permissions. In a real-world scenario, this is critical for industries like finance or healthcare where documents must remain tamper-proof for regulatory audits (e.g., SEC Rule 17a-4 or HIPAA).
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft compliance solutions — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft compliance solutions practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SC-900 questions
1,411 questions across all exam domains
- →
Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals SC-900 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SC-900 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SC-900 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra.
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft security solutions practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to Describe the capabilities of Microsoft security solutions.
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft compliance solutions practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to Describe the capabilities of Microsoft compliance solutions.
Describe the concepts of security, compliance, and identity practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to Describe the concepts of security, compliance, and identity.
SC-900 fundamentals practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to SC-900 fundamentals.
SC-900 scenario practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to SC-900 scenario.
SC-900 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to SC-900 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free SC-900 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SC-900 question test?
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft compliance solutions — This question tests Describe the capabilities of Microsoft compliance solutions — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: The user cannot edit or delete the document. — When a retention label is configured as a regulatory record, it enforces the strictest retention and disposition controls. Regulatory records are immutable by design; once applied, no user—regardless of permissions—can edit or delete the content. This is because the label locks the document to prevent any modification or deletion until the retention period expires and a disposition review is completed.
What should I do if I get this SC-900 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Keep practising
More SC-900 practice questions
- An organization uses Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager to track compliance with regulations. The compliance officer n…
- A company uses Microsoft Teams and wants to ensure that messages containing offensive language are flagged for review. W…
- A financial services firm uses Microsoft Purview Information Barriers to prevent traders from communicating with investm…
- A company uses a cloud-based SaaS (Software as a Service) application for customer relationship management. According to…
- A company has a document management system. The security policy requires that a user in the Sales department can only vi…
- A company implements a security measure to ensure that only authorized employees can view sensitive customer records. Wh…
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This SC-900 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-900 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.