Question 1,380 of 1,411
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft EntramediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Conditional Access with Sign-In Risk for MFA

This SC-900 practice question tests your understanding of describe the capabilities of microsoft entra. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An organization uses Microsoft Entra ID. The security team wants to require multi-factor authentication (MFA) for users who sign in from sessions that Microsoft Entra ID Protection determines to have medium or high sign-in risk. Users signing in from low-risk sessions should not be prompted for MFA. Which feature should the security team configure?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Configure a Conditional Access policy with Sign-in risk as a condition and MFA as a grant control

Option A is correct because a Conditional Access policy can use Sign-in risk (a condition from Microsoft Entra ID Protection) to require MFA as a grant control. This allows the security team to enforce MFA only for sessions with medium or high sign-in risk, while low-risk sessions are not prompted, exactly matching the requirement.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Configure a Conditional Access policy with Sign-in risk as a condition and MFA as a grant control

    Why this is correct

    Conditional Access policies can evaluate sign-in risk from Identity Protection and require MFA only when the risk level matches the configured condition.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Configure a user risk policy in Microsoft Entra ID Protection

    Why it's wrong here

    User risk policies respond to accounts that may be compromised (e.g., leaked credentials), not per-session sign-in risk. The scenario describes sign-in risk per session.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A user risk policy would be correct if the question asked to require MFA when a user account is determined to be compromised (high user risk), such as after leaked credentials are detected, regardless of individual sign-in risk.

  • Assign the Global Administrator role with Privileged Identity Management (PIM) activation requiring MFA

    Why it's wrong here

    PIM controls activation of privileged roles and can require MFA for activation, but it does not apply to all users based on sign-in risk during regular access.

    When this WOULD be correct

    This would be correct if the question asked: 'An organization wants to ensure that when a user activates the Global Administrator role via Privileged Identity Management, they must pass MFA. Which feature should they configure?'

  • Create an access review in Microsoft Entra ID Governance

    Why it's wrong here

    Access reviews are used to periodically review and certify user access, not to enforce real-time MFA based on sign-in risk.

    When this WOULD be correct

    An organization needs to periodically review and confirm that users still require access to critical applications, and remove stale accounts or excessive permissions. In that scenario, creating an access review in Microsoft Entra ID Governance would be the correct feature to configure.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The SC-900 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Configure a Conditional Access policy with Sign-in risk as a condition and MFA as a grant controlCorrect answer

Why this is correct

Conditional Access policies can evaluate sign-in risk from Identity Protection and require MFA only when the risk level matches the configured condition.

Configure a user risk policy in Microsoft Entra ID ProtectionWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

The question requires MFA based on sign-in risk (session risk), not user risk. A user risk policy in ID Protection addresses user-level risk (e.g., compromised account), not sign-in risk from a specific session.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A user risk policy would be correct if the question asked to require MFA when a user account is determined to be compromised (high user risk), such as after leaked credentials are detected, regardless of individual sign-in risk.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates confuse 'user risk' with 'sign-in risk' because both are risk-based policies in ID Protection, but they apply to different risk types and conditions.

Assign the Global Administrator role with Privileged Identity Management (PIM) activation requiring MFAWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

This option addresses privileged role activation requiring MFA, not sign-in risk-based MFA for all users. The question specifically requires MFA based on sign-in risk level (medium/high), which is a Conditional Access policy condition, not a PIM activation setting.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

This would be correct if the question asked: 'An organization wants to ensure that when a user activates the Global Administrator role via Privileged Identity Management, they must pass MFA. Which feature should they configure?'

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse risk-based MFA with privileged access MFA requirements, or think that PIM activation policies can enforce MFA based on sign-in risk, which they cannot.

Create an access review in Microsoft Entra ID GovernanceWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

Access reviews are used to verify and manage user access rights periodically, not to enforce MFA based on sign-in risk. The question specifically requires MFA enforcement for medium/high risk sessions, which is done via Conditional Access policies with sign-in risk condition.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

An organization needs to periodically review and confirm that users still require access to critical applications, and remove stale accounts or excessive permissions. In that scenario, creating an access review in Microsoft Entra ID Governance would be the correct feature to configure.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse access reviews with risk-based policies because both are part of Microsoft Entra ID Protection and Governance, and both involve security oversight. They might think an access review can trigger MFA, but it does not enforce real-time authentication requirements.

Analysis generated from the official SC-900blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is confusing sign-in risk (session-level) with user risk (user-level), leading candidates to choose the user risk policy (Option B) instead of the Conditional Access policy with sign-in risk condition.

Trap categories for this question

  • Scenario analysis trap

    User risk policies respond to accounts that may be compromised (e.g., leaked credentials), not per-session sign-in risk. The scenario describes sign-in risk per session.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Sign-in risk is a real-time assessment by Microsoft Entra ID Protection that uses signals like anonymous IP addresses, atypical travel, or malware-linked IPs. Conditional Access policies evaluate this risk at authentication time and can apply MFA as a grant control, which triggers the user to complete MFA only when the risk level matches the configured condition (e.g., medium or high). This is distinct from user risk, which is based on historical user behavior and typically triggers remediation actions like password reset.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SC-900 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SC-900 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SC-900 question test?

Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra — This question tests Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Configure a Conditional Access policy with Sign-in risk as a condition and MFA as a grant control — Option A is correct because a Conditional Access policy can use Sign-in risk (a condition from Microsoft Entra ID Protection) to require MFA as a grant control. This allows the security team to enforce MFA only for sessions with medium or high sign-in risk, while low-risk sessions are not prompted, exactly matching the requirement.

What should I do if I get this SC-900 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More SC-900 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SC-900 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-900 exam.