- A
Conditional Access
Why wrong: This controls access based on conditions like device or location but does not conduct periodic access reviews or automatically remove users based on review outcomes.
- B
Identity Protection
Why wrong: This detects and remediates identity risks, not a mechanism for manual or automated access reviews of group memberships.
- C
Privileged Identity Management (PIM)
Why wrong: PIM manages privileged role assignments and can include access reviews for privileged roles, but for regular group memberships (like an HR application group), Access Reviews is the intended feature.
- D
Access Reviews
Access Reviews enables administrators to create recurring reviews of group memberships, application access, and role assignments. Unresponsive or denied users can be automatically removed based on review settings.
How to Automate Quarterly Access Reviews with Automatic User Removal
This SC-900 practice question tests your understanding of describe the capabilities of microsoft entra. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A company uses Microsoft Entra ID and needs to regularly review membership of a group that grants access to a sensitive HR application. The identity team wants to automate quarterly reviews and automatically remove users who fail to respond or are denied by the reviewer. Which Microsoft Entra ID feature should they use?
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Access Reviews
Option D is correct because Microsoft Entra Access Reviews are specifically designed to automate periodic attestation of group memberships, including the ability to automatically remove users who do not respond or are denied by the reviewer. This feature supports quarterly recurring reviews and integrates directly with Entra ID groups to enforce access governance for sensitive applications.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
Conditional Access
Why it's wrong here
This controls access based on conditions like device or location but does not conduct periodic access reviews or automatically remove users based on review outcomes.
When this WOULD be correct
An exam question asking: 'A company needs to block access to a sensitive app from untrusted locations unless multi-factor authentication is used. Which feature should they configure?' would make Conditional Access the correct answer.
- ✗
Identity Protection
Why it's wrong here
This detects and remediates identity risks, not a mechanism for manual or automated access reviews of group memberships.
When this WOULD be correct
An organization wants to automatically detect and block sign-ins from anonymous IP addresses or users with leaked credentials, and require multi-factor authentication for high-risk sessions. Identity Protection would be the correct feature to configure risk-based policies.
- ✗
Privileged Identity Management (PIM)
Why it's wrong here
PIM manages privileged role assignments and can include access reviews for privileged roles, but for regular group memberships (like an HR application group), Access Reviews is the intended feature.
- ✓
Access Reviews
Why this is correct
Access Reviews enables administrators to create recurring reviews of group memberships, application access, and role assignments. Unresponsive or denied users can be automatically removed based on review settings.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Option-by-option analysis
Why each answer is right or wrong
Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The SC-900 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.
✓Access ReviewsCorrect answer▾
Why this is correct
Access Reviews enables administrators to create recurring reviews of group memberships, application access, and role assignments. Unresponsive or denied users can be automatically removed based on review settings.
✗Conditional AccessWrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
Conditional Access is used to enforce access policies based on signals like user location or device state, not to automate review and removal of group memberships.
★ When this WOULD be the correct answer
An exam question asking: 'A company needs to block access to a sensitive app from untrusted locations unless multi-factor authentication is used. Which feature should they configure?' would make Conditional Access the correct answer.
Why candidates choose this
Candidates may confuse Conditional Access's policy enforcement with the review and remediation process, thinking it can automatically remove users based on policy violations.
✗Identity ProtectionWrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
Identity Protection is designed to detect and respond to identity-based risks, such as compromised credentials or suspicious sign-ins, not to automate periodic membership reviews with removal of non-responding or denied users.
★ When this WOULD be the correct answer
An organization wants to automatically detect and block sign-ins from anonymous IP addresses or users with leaked credentials, and require multi-factor authentication for high-risk sessions. Identity Protection would be the correct feature to configure risk-based policies.
Why candidates choose this
Candidates may confuse Identity Protection's automated risk remediation with the review and removal process, or think it includes user access governance features.
Analysis generated from the official SC-900blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates often confuse Privileged Identity Management (PIM) with Access Reviews because both involve 'reviews,' but PIM only handles role activation and approval workflows, not recurring group membership attestation with automatic removal.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Access Reviews leverage the Entra ID Graph API to evaluate membership against reviewer decisions, and the 'auto-apply' setting triggers removal of denied or non-responsive users via the Remove-AzureADMSGroupMember cmdlet. Under the hood, each review instance creates a snapshot of group membership and tracks reviewer responses, with a default grace period of 30 days before automatic removal occurs. In a real-world scenario, this ensures compliance with regulations like SOX or GDPR by providing an auditable trail of attestation cycles.
KKey Concepts to Remember
- Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
- Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
- Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
- Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
- Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
- →
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
- →
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
- →
All SC-900 questions
1,411 questions across all exam domains
- →
Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals SC-900 study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
- →
SC-900 practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Related SC-900 practice-question pages
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra.
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft security solutions practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to Describe the capabilities of Microsoft security solutions.
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft compliance solutions practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to Describe the capabilities of Microsoft compliance solutions.
Describe the concepts of security, compliance, and identity practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to Describe the concepts of security, compliance, and identity.
SC-900 fundamentals practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to SC-900 fundamentals.
SC-900 scenario practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to SC-900 scenario.
SC-900 troubleshooting practice questions
Practise SC-900 questions linked to SC-900 troubleshooting.
Practice this exam
Start a free SC-900 practice session
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Questions learners often ask
What does this SC-900 question test?
Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra — This question tests Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Access Reviews — Option D is correct because Microsoft Entra Access Reviews are specifically designed to automate periodic attestation of group memberships, including the ability to automatically remove users who do not respond or are denied by the reviewer. This feature supports quarterly recurring reviews and integrates directly with Entra ID groups to enforce access governance for sensitive applications.
What should I do if I get this SC-900 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Same concept, more angles
1 more ways this is tested on SC-900
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. Your company uses Microsoft Entra ID. Security policy requires that all external guest users must be reviewed and their access approved by their sponsor every 90 days. If not approved, access should be automatically removed. Which feature should you use?
medium- A.Microsoft Entra Conditional Access
- B.Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration settings
- C.Microsoft Entra entitlement management
- ✓ D.Microsoft Entra access reviews
Why D: Microsoft Entra access reviews (Option D) allow you to configure recurring reviews of guest users' access, with automatic removal of access if not approved. This directly meets the requirement for a 90-day review cycle with automatic enforcement, as access reviews can be scoped to guest users and integrated with entitlement management or groups.
Keep practising
More SC-900 practice questions
- An organization uses Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager to track compliance with regulations. The compliance officer n…
- A company uses Microsoft Teams and wants to ensure that messages containing offensive language are flagged for review. W…
- A financial services firm uses Microsoft Purview Information Barriers to prevent traders from communicating with investm…
- A company uses a cloud-based SaaS (Software as a Service) application for customer relationship management. According to…
- A company has a document management system. The security policy requires that a user in the Sales department can only vi…
- A company implements a security measure to ensure that only authorized employees can view sensitive customer records. Wh…
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This SC-900 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-900 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.