SC-200 Respond to security incidents Practice Question
This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of respond to security incidents. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Exhibit
Refer to the exhibit.
```kusto
let TimeFrame = 1h;
let Threshold = 5;
SigninLogs
| where TimeGenerated > ago(TimeFrame)
| where Status.errorCode == 50057
| summarize FailedAttempts = count() by UserPrincipalName, IPAddress
| where FailedAttempts > Threshold
```
Refer to the exhibit. You are analyzing a KQL query in Microsoft Sentinel that generates an incident for users with more than 5 failed sign-in attempts (error code 50057 indicates user account is disabled) from a single IP in the last hour. After enabling the rule, you receive too many incidents from a service account that legitimately fails frequently. How should you modify the query to reduce false positives?
Exhibit
Refer to the exhibit.
```kusto
let TimeFrame = 1h;
let Threshold = 5;
SigninLogs
| where TimeGenerated > ago(TimeFrame)
| where Status.errorCode == 50057
| summarize FailedAttempts = count() by UserPrincipalName, IPAddress
| where FailedAttempts > Threshold
```
A
Change the error code to 50126
Why wrong: 50126 is an invalid username/password; this changes the alert logic.
B
Add a filter to exclude the service account: and UserPrincipalName !="svc-account@domain.com"
Excluding the known noisy account eliminates false positives while preserving detection for others.
C
Remove the IPAddress from the summarize clause and group only by UserPrincipalName
Why wrong: Grouping only by user still includes the service account.
D
Increase the Threshold to 10
Why wrong: Increasing threshold reduces sensitivity but does not target the specific false positive source.
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Add a filter to exclude the service account: and UserPrincipalName !="svc-account@domain.com"
Option B is correct because adding a filter to exclude the service account directly addresses the false positives. The service account legitimately fails frequently, so excluding it from the query prevents incidents from that account while maintaining detection for other users. Option A is incorrect because changing the error code to 50126 would alter the detection logic and not target the service account issue. Option C is incorrect because removing IPAddress from the summarize clause would eliminate the 'from a single IP' condition, potentially generating incidents for failed attempts from multiple IPs and not solving the false positives. Option D is incorrect because increasing the threshold to 10 would reduce sensitivity but does not specifically exclude the service account, potentially still generating false positives if the service account fails more than 10 times.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
✗
Change the error code to 50126
Why it's wrong here
50126 is an invalid username/password; this changes the alert logic.
✓
Add a filter to exclude the service account: and UserPrincipalName !="svc-account@domain.com"
Why this is correct
Excluding the known noisy account eliminates false positives while preserving detection for others.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
✗
Remove the IPAddress from the summarize clause and group only by UserPrincipalName
Why it's wrong here
Grouping only by user still includes the service account.
✗
Increase the Threshold to 10
Why it's wrong here
Increasing threshold reduces sensitivity but does not target the specific false positive source.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.
KKey Concepts to Remember
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.
TExam Day Tips
→Underline the problem statement mentally.
→Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
→Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A cloud solutions architect for a retail company is evaluating services for a new workload. The correct answer here reflects best practice for the specific scenario described — not a general cloud recommendation. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Cloud exam questions reward reading the constraint carefully: the same technology can be right or wrong depending on the use case.
Related glossary terms
Concepts from this question explained
These glossary pages explain the core terms tested in this SC-200 question in full detail.
Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
Respond to security incidents — This question tests Respond to security incidents — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Add a filter to exclude the service account: and UserPrincipalName !="svc-account@domain.com" — Option B is correct because adding a filter to exclude the service account directly addresses the false positives. The service account legitimately fails frequently, so excluding it from the query prevents incidents from that account while maintaining detection for other users. Option A is incorrect because changing the error code to 50126 would alter the detection logic and not target the service account issue. Option C is incorrect because removing IPAddress from the summarize clause would eliminate the 'from a single IP' condition, potentially generating incidents for failed attempts from multiple IPs and not solving the false positives. Option D is incorrect because increasing the threshold to 10 would reduce sensitivity but does not specifically exclude the service account, potentially still generating false positives if the service account fails more than 10 times.
What should I do if I get this SC-200 question wrong?
Identify which SC-200 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.