Question 939 of 1,639
Respond to security incidentshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

SC-200 Respond to security incidents Practice Question

This SC-200 practice question tests your understanding of respond to security incidents. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A security administrator receives an alert from Microsoft Defender for Identity about a suspicious Kerberos ticket request from a domain controller. The alert suggests a possible Golden Ticket attack. Which action should the administrator take to validate the alert?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Check the domain controller's Security event log for Event ID 4769 with suspicious attributes.

Event ID 4769 (Kerberos Service Ticket Request) on a domain controller is the authoritative source for validating suspicious ticket requests. In a Golden Ticket attack, the forged ticket often exhibits anomalous attributes such as an unusually long lifetime, a non-existent or disabled user account, or encryption type mismatches (e.g., RC4 when AES is expected). Reviewing this log directly confirms whether the ticket characteristics deviate from normal Kerberos behavior, providing definitive evidence for the alert.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Review Microsoft Defender for Identity alerts for brute force attempts.

    Why it's wrong here

    Brute force alerts are not directly related to Golden Ticket attacks.

  • Check the domain controller's Security event log for Event ID 4769 with suspicious attributes.

    Why this is correct

    Event ID 4769 logs Kerberos service ticket requests; anomalous entries can indicate forged tickets.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Reset the krbtgt account password twice.

    Why it's wrong here

    Resetting krbtgt twice is a remediation step after validation, not a validation step.

  • Verify if the user account associated with the ticket is disabled.

    Why it's wrong here

    A disabled account could be a sign, but the primary validation is through event logs.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates confuse validation steps with remediation actions, specifically choosing to reset the krbtgt password (Option C) before confirming the attack through log analysis, which would destroy forensic evidence and fail to validate the alert.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Golden Ticket attacks exploit the KRBTGT account's NTLM hash to forge TGTs, which are then used to request service tickets (TGS) for any resource. Event ID 4769 logs the TGS request and includes fields such as Ticket Options, Ticket Encryption Type, and Service Name; a forged ticket often uses an encryption type (e.g., 0x17 for RC4) that does not match the domain's configured Kerberos encryption types. In real-world scenarios, attackers may also set the ticket lifetime to the maximum allowed (e.g., 10 years), which appears in the log as an abnormally long duration.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A company's IT admin needs to give a contractor read-only access to production logs without sharing account credentials. Using role-based access control (RBAC) and temporary scoped permissions — not a permanent shared password — is the correct pattern. Questions like this test whether you can apply least-privilege access across cloud identity services.

Quick reference

Symmetric Encryption Algorithm Comparison

AlgorithmKey SizeBlock SizeStatusNotes
AES-128128-bit128-bitCurrent standardNIST approved; WPA3, TLS
AES-256256-bit128-bitCurrent standardPreferred for sensitive / govt data
3DES112-bit effective64-bitDeprecated (2023)Replaced by AES
DES56-bit64-bitBrokenCracked in < 24 h; never deploy
ChaCha20256-bitStream cipherCurrentTLS 1.3, WireGuard

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SC-200 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SC-200 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SC-200 question test?

Respond to security incidents — This question tests Respond to security incidents — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Check the domain controller's Security event log for Event ID 4769 with suspicious attributes. — Event ID 4769 (Kerberos Service Ticket Request) on a domain controller is the authoritative source for validating suspicious ticket requests. In a Golden Ticket attack, the forged ticket often exhibits anomalous attributes such as an unusually long lifetime, a non-existent or disabled user account, or encryption type mismatches (e.g., RC4 when AES is expected). Reviewing this log directly confirms whether the ticket characteristics deviate from normal Kerberos behavior, providing definitive evidence for the alert.

What should I do if I get this SC-200 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More SC-200 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SC-200 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SC-200 exam.