Courseiva
mediumMultiple Choice

MS-900 A company has 100 Microsoft 365 E3 users Practice Question

A company has 100 Microsoft 365 E3 users. They need to add advanced threat protection (Microsoft Defender for Microsoft 365 Plan 2) and advanced compliance (eDiscovery Premium) for all users. They want to minimize additional costs while keeping their existing E3 subscriptions. What is the most cost-effective licensing strategy?

⚠ Common exam trap

Candidates often assume upgrading to E5 is the only way to get both advanced security and compliance features, overlooking the cost-saving option of purchasing the specific E5 add-ons for existing E3 users.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Purchase both the Microsoft 365 E5 Compliance add-on and the Microsoft 365 E5 Security add-on

The Microsoft 365 E5 Security add-on provides Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Plan 2, and the Microsoft 365 E5 Compliance add-on provides eDiscovery Premium. Purchasing both add-ons for existing E3 users delivers the required advanced threat protection and advanced compliance capabilities without the full cost of upgrading to E5, making it the most cost-effective strategy.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✓

    Purchase both the Microsoft 365 E5 Compliance add-on and the Microsoft 365 E5 Security add-on

    Why this is correct

    E5 Security covers Defender for Microsoft 365 Plan 2; E5 Compliance covers eDiscovery Premium. Buying both add-ons for 100 users costs less than migrating everyone to full E5 licences, satisfying the minimise-additional-cost constraint while retaining existing E3 subscriptions.

  • ✗

    Upgrade all users to Microsoft 365 E5

    Why it's wrong here

    Upgrading every user to Microsoft 365 E5 bundles both capabilities, yet it also pays for numerous E5 features the company has not requested, contradicting the minimise-cost requirement. It is tempting because E5 is the correct choice when an organisation needs the full suite of advanced security and compliance workloads.

  • ✗

    Purchase only the Microsoft 365 E5 Compliance add-on

    Why it's wrong here

    The E5 Compliance add-on supplies eDiscovery Premium but excludes Microsoft Defender for Microsoft 365 Plan 2, so the threat protection requirement stays unmet and a second add-on becomes necessary. It is tempting because it is the correct purchase when only advanced compliance capabilities are needed on top of E3.

  • ✗

    Purchase only the Microsoft 365 E5 Security add-on

    Why it's wrong here

    The E5 Security add-on delivers Defender for Microsoft 365 Plan 2 but omits eDiscovery Premium, leaving the compliance requirement unfulfilled and forcing an extra add-on. It is tempting because it is the right purchase when only advanced threat protection is required alongside existing E3 licences.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

One of 794 original MS-900 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This MS-900 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MS-900 exam.