Courseiva

MS-102 Manage compliance by using Microsoft Purview Practice Question

Your organization uses Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager. You need to assign a control to a specific user for implementation. What should you do?

⚠ Common exam trap

MS-102 often tests the confusion between assigning a role (which grants permissions) and assigning a control owner (which assigns accountability) — candidates incorrectly pick the role option thinking it delegates the control.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Edit the control and assign a new owner.

In Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager, each control within an assessment has an 'Assigned to' field that designates the individual responsible for implementing and documenting that control. Editing the control and assigning a new owner is the correct way to delegate accountability for a specific control to a user. This assignment is purely for tracking and workflow purposes and does not grant any permissions to the user.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Assign the user the Compliance Manager role.

    Why it's wrong here

    The Compliance Manager role grants permissions to create and manage assessments, not ownership of an individual control's implementation. Role assignment is correct when delegating administrative access to the Compliance Manager solution itself; assigning a control to a person for implementation is done through that control's implementation owner setting.

  • ✓

    Edit the control and assign a new owner.

    Why this is correct

    Editing the control lets you set a new owner, which is exactly how Compliance Manager delegates implementation responsibility. Ownership assignment sits on the control itself, not on assessments or improvement actions, so reassigning the owner directly satisfies the requirement to make one named user accountable for that control.

  • ✗

    Create a DLP policy to enforce the control.

    Why it's wrong here

    A DLP policy inspects and blocks sensitive content flows; it cannot assign implementation ownership of a Compliance Manager control. The tempting overlap is that both live in Microsoft Purview, but DLP addresses data-handling requirements, whereas assigning a control to a named user requires setting its implementation owner within the assessment.

  • ✗

    Modify the assessment to include the user.

    Why it's wrong here

    Adding a user to an assessment grants them visibility of that assessment's controls; it does not designate them as the implementer of one specific control. Assessment membership is for scoping which regulations and workloads are evaluated, so it would be right when onboarding a colleague to review a whole assessment, not for assigning single-control ownership.

About these practice questions

Courseiva writes every MS-102 question from scratch — 712 in total, each with an explanation and a wrong-answer breakdown. None are copied from real exams or dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Microsoft exam blueprint

This MS-102 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MS-102 exam.