Courseiva

MS-700 Monitor, Report on, and Troubleshoot Teams Practice Question

You are a Teams administrator for a large organization. You need to investigate why a specific user's Teams meetings frequently have poor video quality. You have already used Call Analytics and identified that the issue is related to the network. You now want to see a detailed breakdown of the media streams, including the codecs used and the network traversal details, for a particular meeting session. Which tool should you use?

⚠ Common exam trap

The trap here is assuming that CQD provides session-level details because it is a quality dashboard, when in fact it only offers aggregated data.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

✓

Call Analytics session details

Call Analytics session details offer the deepest level of diagnostic information for a single call or meeting, including per-stream media metrics and codec details. While CQD is excellent for aggregate analysis, it cannot show session-level specifics. Call history and network connectivity tests lack the technical depth required to analyze media streams and network traversal for a specific meeting.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • ✗

    Call Quality Dashboard (CQD)

    Why it's wrong here

    CQD provides aggregate call quality data across the organization and allows filtering by dimensions like user, location, and network type. However, it does not provide session-level details such as individual media streams, codecs, and network traversal for a single meeting. It is better suited for identifying trends and broad issues rather than deep-diving into one session.

  • ✗

    Teams admin center > Users > Manage users > Call history

    Why it's wrong here

    Call history in the Teams admin center shows a list of calls and meetings for a user, including date, time, and participants, but it does not include technical details about media streams, codecs, or network traversal. It is useful for auditing who called whom, but not for troubleshooting media quality at the stream level.

  • ✓

    Call Analytics session details

    Why this is correct

    Call Analytics session details provide a granular view of a specific call or meeting, including media stream information such as codecs used, network traversal (relay vs. direct), packet loss, jitter, and latency for each stream. This is exactly what is needed to investigate poor video quality for a particular meeting and understand the technical reasons behind it.

  • ✗

    Microsoft 365 network connectivity test tool

    Why it's wrong here

    The network connectivity test tool checks network readiness and connectivity to Microsoft 365 endpoints from a specific location. It does not provide per-session media stream details or codec information for a specific meeting. It is used for pre-deployment validation or diagnosing general network issues, not for analyzing a particular meeting's media characteristics.

About these practice questions

One of 211 original MS-700 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written and reviewed by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

Last reviewed September 2026 · checked against the official Microsoft exam blueprint

This MS-700 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the MS-700 exam.