Courseiva
Monitor, configure, and optimize database resourcesmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

DP-300 Practice Question: Monitor, configure, and optimize database resources

Your company uses Azure SQL Database with Active Geo-Replication for disaster recovery. During a routine failover drill, you observe that after failover to the secondary region, the application experiences significantly higher latency for write operations. The secondary database is in a different Azure region and has the same service objective. What is the most likely cause of the increased write latency?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The secondary database does not have a local read-scale replica configured.

After failover to the secondary region, the new primary (formerly the secondary) is in a different Azure region. The secondary database did not have a local read-scale replica configured before failover, so the new primary lacks a read-scale replica to offload read traffic. This can cause resource contention and increased latency for write operations, as the database handles both reads and writes without dedicated replicas. Option A is incorrect because geo-replication does not inherently add latency to all writes—only replicating writes asynchronously may cause slight delay, but not significant latency. Option B is incorrect because the service objective is stated to be the same. Option C is incorrect because after failover, the secondary becomes writable and accepts write traffic.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Geo-replication introduces additional latency for all write operations.

    Why it's wrong here

    Geo-replication is asynchronous and does not affect write latency on the primary.

  • The secondary database has a lower service objective than the primary.

    Why it's wrong here

    The scenario states the same service objective.

  • The secondary database is not configured to accept write traffic.

    Why it's wrong here

    After failover, the secondary becomes the primary and accepts writes; the latency is not due to this.

  • The secondary database does not have a local read-scale replica configured.

    Why this is correct

    After failover, the new primary may not have a readable secondary, so all read-write workloads hit the primary, increasing load and latency.

About these practice questions

One of 906 original DP-300 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This DP-300 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Microsoft certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DP-300 exam.