mediummulti selectObjective-mapped

Two line-of-business VMs in a single region must stay available if one physical host is patched or fails. A zone failure is not part of the requirement. Which three actions should the administrator take? Select three.

Question 1mediummulti select
Full question →

Two line-of-business VMs in a single region must stay available if one physical host is patched or fails. A zone failure is not part of the requirement. Which three actions should the administrator take? Select three.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

Create an availability set for the application VMs before deployment.

An availability set is the correct Azure construct for protecting workloads from host-level maintenance and failures inside a datacenter. It provides the placement mechanism needed to improve availability without requiring zone-level resilience.

B

Best answer

Deploy both VMs into the same availability set.

Both VMs must be members of the same availability set for Azure to distribute them according to the set's fault and update domains. Separating them into different sets would defeat the availability design.

C

Best answer

Allow Azure to place the VMs across different fault and update domains within the availability set.

Fault and update domain distribution is the main benefit of an availability set. Azure handles the placement automatically once the VMs are in the set, reducing the chance that a single maintenance event affects all instances.

D

Distractor review

Deploy the VMs in separate availability zones to protect against a datacenter outage.

Availability zones are for protecting against datacenter or zone failures, which is beyond the stated requirement. They are not the best answer when the scenario only calls for host-level resilience.

E

Distractor review

Use a single larger VM and rely on snapshots for uptime.

A bigger single VM does not provide redundancy. Snapshots help with recovery, but they do not keep the application running during a host patch or failure event.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Create an availability set for the application VMs before deployment. — An availability set is the right choice when the goal is to survive host-level maintenance or failure inside one region. By placing both VMs in the same availability set, Azure spreads them across fault and update domains automatically. That reduces the chance that a single maintenance operation or hardware problem takes down both instances at the same time. Why others are wrong: Availability zones are intended for datacenter-level resilience, which the requirement explicitly does not need. A single larger VM still leaves one point of failure, and snapshots are a recovery aid rather than availability design. The correct solution is host-level redundancy through an availability set.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.