mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A team needs to deploy 25 identical Ubuntu VMs every month from source control. The deployment must be repeatable, and each VM must include a system-assigned managed identity at creation time. Which approach should be used?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A team needs to deploy 25 identical Ubuntu VMs every month from source control. The deployment must be repeatable, and each VM must include a system-assigned managed identity at creation time. Which approach should be used?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Azure portal manual creation of each VM.

Manual portal steps are difficult to repeat consistently and are not source-controlled.

B

Best answer

A Bicep template deployment.

Bicep is declarative, versionable in source control, and can define VM identity settings at deployment time.

C

Distractor review

An Azure Policy assignment at the subscription level.

Policy can enforce compliance, but it does not create a full repeatable deployment from code.

D

Distractor review

An Azure Monitor alert rule that triggers VM creation.

Alerts notify on conditions; they are not the right mechanism for controlled infrastructure deployment.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: A Bicep template deployment. — Bicep is the best answer because it supports declarative infrastructure as code, which means the same template can be checked into source control and deployed repeatedly with consistent results. A VM resource in Bicep can include the identity block so that each machine gets a system-assigned managed identity during provisioning. That combination satisfies repeatability, standardization, and secretless authentication. Why others are wrong: Manual portal deployment is too error-prone and cannot reliably enforce identical settings across monthly builds. Azure Policy is useful for compliance after deployment, but it does not define the deployment itself. Azure Monitor alerts are for observation and response, not for constructing repeatable infrastructure from code.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.