mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

Exhibit

Troubleshooting summary: VM1 to VM2 on TCP 1433 shows Status = Blocked; connection troubleshooting reports that the destination is reachable at the route level; the administrator needs the specific allow or deny rule name.

Based on the exhibit, which Network Watcher tool should the administrator use to identify the exact NSG rule that is blocking TCP 1433 traffic?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Based on the exhibit, which Network Watcher tool should the administrator use to identify the exact NSG rule that is blocking TCP 1433 traffic?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Connection troubleshoot

This confirms reachability and path issues, but it does not identify the exact NSG rule.

B

Best answer

IP flow verify

IP flow verify returns whether a flow is allowed or denied and shows the matching NSG rule.

C

Distractor review

Next hop

Next hop only shows routing decisions, not security rule matches for a specific flow.

D

Distractor review

Packet capture

Packet capture can help analyze packets, but it is not the fastest way to identify the NSG rule.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: IP flow verify — IP flow verify is the Network Watcher tool that evaluates a specific source, destination, protocol, and port against NSG rules and reports whether the flow is allowed or denied. Because the exhibit asks for the exact rule responsible for blocking TCP 1433, IP flow verify is the right tool. Connection troubleshooting and next hop are useful, but they focus on connectivity and routing rather than rule-level security decisions. Why others are wrong: Connection troubleshoot is useful for end-to-end path validation, but it does not pinpoint the exact security rule. Next hop only exposes route selection, not NSG evaluation. Packet capture can provide packet-level evidence, but it is heavier and less direct than IP flow verify for identifying a specific allow or deny rule.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.