mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

Exhibit

Policy assignment details:
- Scope: RG-Prod
- Policy definition: Add tag Environment=Prod
- Effect: Modify
Observed result:
- New resources are tagged
- Existing VMs in RG-Prod remain untagged

Based on the exhibit, an Azure Policy with the Modify effect was assigned to add Environment=Prod to resources in RG-Prod. New resources get the tag, but existing virtual machines still do not have it. What should the administrator do next?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Based on the exhibit, an Azure Policy with the Modify effect was assigned to add Environment=Prod to resources in RG-Prod. New resources get the tag, but existing virtual machines still do not have it. What should the administrator do next?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

Create a remediation task for the policy assignment.

Modify can add or update the tag for future deployments, but existing resources usually need remediation so the policy engine can apply the change to what is already deployed. A remediation task is the correct next step.

B

Distractor review

Move the policy assignment to the subscription scope.

Changing the scope does not automatically update existing resources. The assignment is already at the correct RG scope for the requirement.

C

Distractor review

Change the policy effect from Modify to Deny.

Deny would block noncompliant deployments, but it still would not backfill tags onto existing virtual machines.

D

Distractor review

Add a CanNotDelete lock to RG-Prod.

A lock protects against deletion, but it has nothing to do with evaluating or correcting tag compliance.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: ACLs stop at the first match

ACLs are processed top to bottom. The first matching entry wins, and an implicit deny usually exists at the end.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

ACL questions test precision: source, destination, protocol, port and direction. A generally correct ACL can still fail if it is applied on the wrong interface or in the wrong direction.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Standard ACLs match source addresses.
  • Extended ACLs can match source, destination, protocol and ports.
  • The first matching ACL entry is used.
  • There is usually an implicit deny at the end.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check inbound versus outbound direction.
  • Read the ACL from top to bottom.
  • Look for a broader permit or deny above the intended line.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Standard ACLs match source addresses.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Create a remediation task for the policy assignment. — Modify policies commonly affect new or updated resources, but existing noncompliant resources often require remediation to be brought into compliance. By creating a remediation task, the administrator instructs Azure Policy to evaluate and update the already deployed VMs so the Environment tag is applied consistently. This is the correct operational step after the policy assignment is in place. Why others are wrong: Moving the assignment does not trigger retroactive updates by itself. Deny is about preventing future noncompliant creation, not fixing existing resources. Locks do not interact with policy remediation or tags, so they cannot solve the missing tag issue.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.