easymultiple choiceObjective-mapped

Exhibit

Compliance report excerpt

Policy assignment: Require-department-tag
Scope: corp-root management group
Effect: Deny
Noncompliant resources:
- rg-merger01/storage accounts
- rg-merger02/storage accounts
Exception request:
- Allow only resource group rg-merger01 to bypass this policy for 45 days
- Keep the policy active for everyone else

Based on the exhibit, a compliance dashboard shows that several storage accounts are marked noncompliant because they do not have the required tag. The policy itself is correct, but one business unit needs a temporary exception for a single resource group during a merger. What should the administrator configure?

Question 1easymultiple choice
Full question →

Based on the exhibit, a compliance dashboard shows that several storage accounts are marked noncompliant because they do not have the required tag. The policy itself is correct, but one business unit needs a temporary exception for a single resource group during a merger. What should the administrator configure?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

A policy exemption at the rg-merger01 resource group scope.

A policy exemption lets the administrator document and scope a temporary exception without disabling the policy for the rest of the environment. Because the request applies to one resource group for a limited time, an exemption at that scope is the cleanest governance solution.

B

Distractor review

Delete the policy assignment from corp-root and recreate it later.

Deleting the assignment would remove enforcement for the entire management group, not just the requested resource group. That would create a governance gap and allow other noncompliant resources to slip through during the merger period.

C

Distractor review

Move rg-merger01 to a separate subscription so the policy no longer applies.

Moving the resource group is disruptive and unnecessary. It also does not solve the policy control problem in the simplest way. Azure Policy exemptions are specifically designed for temporary, scoped exceptions without restructuring the environment.

D

Distractor review

Change the policy effect to Audit so the resources can remain noncompliant.

Audit removes enforcement for everyone and would permit any resource to violate the tag requirement. The organization wants a single temporary exception, not a weaker policy baseline for all resources under the management group.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: ACLs stop at the first match

ACLs are processed top to bottom. The first matching entry wins, and an implicit deny usually exists at the end.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

ACL questions test precision: source, destination, protocol, port and direction. A generally correct ACL can still fail if it is applied on the wrong interface or in the wrong direction.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Standard ACLs match source addresses.
  • Extended ACLs can match source, destination, protocol and ports.
  • The first matching ACL entry is used.
  • There is usually an implicit deny at the end.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check inbound versus outbound direction.
  • Read the ACL from top to bottom.
  • Look for a broader permit or deny above the intended line.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Standard ACLs match source addresses.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: A policy exemption at the rg-merger01 resource group scope. — The administrator should configure a policy exemption for rg-merger01. Exemptions are intended for temporary, justified exceptions to an otherwise valid policy assignment. This preserves the deny behavior for the rest of the management group while allowing only the specified resource group to bypass the rule during the merger window. Why others are wrong: Deleting the assignment or switching to Audit would weaken governance for many resources, not just one. Moving the resource group is operationally disruptive and unnecessary. The key clue is that the policy is correct and only a single, time-limited exception is needed, which is exactly what an exemption provides.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.