mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

An application subnet has a network security group with these inbound rules: Allow-Web-From-Internet at priority 200, Allow-App-From-Web at priority 300, and Deny-All-Inbound at priority 250. The web tier must reach the app tier on TCP 8080, but traffic is being denied. The administrator confirms the source and destination IPs are correct. What is the best fix?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

An application subnet has a network security group with these inbound rules: Allow-Web-From-Internet at priority 200, Allow-App-From-Web at priority 300, and Deny-All-Inbound at priority 250. The web tier must reach the app tier on TCP 8080, but traffic is being denied. The administrator confirms the source and destination IPs are correct. What is the best fix?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Delete the Deny-All-Inbound rule because default NSG rules will allow the traffic.

Default rules are not meant to replace a required deny rule, and deleting the custom deny rule is not necessary if priority is corrected.

B

Best answer

Change the Allow-App-From-Web rule to a lower priority number than 250.

NSG rules are processed in priority order, and the lowest number wins. Because Deny-All-Inbound at 250 is evaluated before the allow rule at 300, it blocks the traffic first. Moving the allow rule to a lower number than 250 lets the permitted web-to-app traffic match before the deny rule is applied.

C

Distractor review

Add a route table entry for TCP 8080 traffic to bypass the NSG.

Route tables determine next hop, not firewall decisions. NSGs still evaluate the traffic even when routing is correct.

D

Distractor review

Move the Allow-Web-From-Internet rule to priority 400.

This would make the web inbound allow rule evaluated later, which does not help app-tier traffic and could make other traffic more restrictive.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses

Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
  • Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
  • Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
  • The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.

TExam Day Tips

  • Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
  • Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
  • Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Change the Allow-App-From-Web rule to a lower priority number than 250. — The deny rule is taking precedence because it has a lower priority number than the allow rule. NSGs evaluate rules from the lowest priority number to the highest, and the first match is applied. To permit the web tier to reach the app tier, the allow rule must be moved to a priority lower than 250 so it is evaluated before Deny-All-Inbound. This is the cleanest fix. Why others are wrong: A removes a protection control rather than solving the ordering problem, and the default rules would not necessarily permit the desired app-to-app path. C confuses routing with security filtering; a route cannot override an NSG deny. D changes an unrelated rule and would not alter the order between the deny rule and the application allow rule.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.