mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A Windows VM and a Linux VM in Azure need to use the same shared folder for application artifacts. The team wants a managed file service instead of running a separate file server VM, and both operating systems must be able to mount the share using a standard protocol. Which solution should the administrator implement?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A Windows VM and a Linux VM in Azure need to use the same shared folder for application artifacts. The team wants a managed file service instead of running a separate file server VM, and both operating systems must be able to mount the share using a standard protocol. Which solution should the administrator implement?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Create a blob container and mount it as a file system from both virtual machines.

Blob containers are object storage, not a shared file system in the same sense as a file share. They do not provide the typical mounting experience expected for Windows and Linux workloads in this scenario. This option does not meet the requirement for a standard shared folder.

B

Best answer

Create an Azure Files share and mount it over SMB from both virtual machines.

Azure Files is the managed file service designed for shared file access. SMB is supported by Windows natively and can also be mounted from Linux using standard tools. This gives both VMs access to the same share without introducing a separate file server VM, which fits the requirement precisely.

C

Distractor review

Use an Azure managed disk and attach it to both virtual machines.

A managed disk is not intended as a general shared file service for multiple VMs in this way. It is normally attached to one VM, and sharing it does not provide the same simple multi-platform file access model as Azure Files. This would create management and availability problems.

D

Distractor review

Create an Azure Files share and force the Linux VM to use NFS while the Windows VM uses SMB.

Azure Files can support different protocols in some scenarios, but this split-protocol design is unnecessary here and is not the simplest common approach. The requirement is a standard shared protocol that both systems can mount consistently, which makes SMB the better choice for this workload.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Create an Azure Files share and mount it over SMB from both virtual machines. — Azure Files is the managed Azure service for shared file storage, and SMB is the common protocol that Windows supports natively and Linux can mount with standard clients. Using Azure Files avoids deploying and maintaining a separate file server VM. It also gives the operations team a single shared location for application artifacts that both operating systems can access consistently. Why others are wrong: Blob storage is object storage and is not the right fit for a shared folder use case. A managed disk is not designed for convenient multi-VM shared access. The mixed SMB/NFS approach is unnecessary and does not match the simplest interoperable design for both Windows and Linux clients in this scenario.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.