mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A subnet is associated with a NAT gateway, but outbound traffic from the VMs still leaves through a network virtual appliance because the subnet has a user-defined route for 0.0.0.0/0 with next hop type Virtual appliance. The workload must use the NAT gateway for internet-bound traffic while keeping more specific routes intact. What should the administrator change?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A subnet is associated with a NAT gateway, but outbound traffic from the VMs still leaves through a network virtual appliance because the subnet has a user-defined route for 0.0.0.0/0 with next hop type Virtual appliance. The workload must use the NAT gateway for internet-bound traffic while keeping more specific routes intact. What should the administrator change?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Disable the subnet's network security group so the NAT gateway can take effect.

NSGs control filtering, not route selection. Removing an NSG would not change which next hop is chosen for internet traffic.

B

Best answer

Remove the 0.0.0.0/0 user-defined route from the subnet route table.

A default UDR to a virtual appliance overrides the system default route, so the NAT gateway never becomes the effective internet egress path. Removing that default route restores normal outbound routing, and the NAT gateway can then provide the public source IP for internet-bound traffic. More specific UDRs for private prefixes can remain in place.

C

Distractor review

Enable gateway route propagation on the route table.

Gateway route propagation is for routes learned through a VPN or ExpressRoute gateway. It does not override a specific 0.0.0.0/0 UDR already sending traffic to a virtual appliance.

D

Distractor review

Attach a public IP address to each virtual machine NIC.

Individual public IPs would bypass the desired NAT gateway design and are operationally harder to manage. They also do not fix the existing route precedence issue.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses

Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
  • Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
  • Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
  • The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.

TExam Day Tips

  • Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
  • Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
  • Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Remove the 0.0.0.0/0 user-defined route from the subnet route table. — When a subnet has a 0.0.0.0/0 user-defined route to a virtual appliance, that route takes precedence over the system default route. A NAT gateway cannot override the UDR, so internet-bound traffic keeps following the appliance. Removing the default route lets the subnet use the normal system route, and the NAT gateway then supplies predictable outbound public IP behavior. Why others are wrong: NSGs do not select the path traffic follows, so they cannot fix routing precedence. Gateway route propagation applies only to learned gateway routes and does not defeat a static default UDR. Adding public IPs to each NIC changes the architecture and does not address the root cause of the route table conflict.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.