mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A subnet has a NAT gateway attached, but outbound internet traffic from the VMs is still leaving through a network virtual appliance. The subnet's route table includes a user-defined route for 0.0.0.0/0 with the next hop set to Virtual appliance. The business wants internet traffic to use the NAT gateway while keeping any required specific routes to on-premises networks. What should the administrator do?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A subnet has a NAT gateway attached, but outbound internet traffic from the VMs is still leaving through a network virtual appliance. The subnet's route table includes a user-defined route for 0.0.0.0/0 with the next hop set to Virtual appliance. The business wants internet traffic to use the NAT gateway while keeping any required specific routes to on-premises networks. What should the administrator do?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Keep the default route and add a second NAT gateway to the subnet.

Azure does not support using two NAT gateways on the same subnet to solve routing precedence.

B

Best answer

Remove the 0.0.0.0/0 user-defined route and keep only specific routes for private prefixes.

A subnet-level 0.0.0.0/0 UDR to a virtual appliance overrides the system route that would otherwise let the NAT gateway handle internet-bound traffic. Removing that default route restores normal outbound internet handling through the NAT gateway, while more specific routes for on-premises or private destinations can remain in place. This preserves both functionality and control.

C

Distractor review

Disable network security groups on the subnet so the NAT gateway becomes active.

NSGs do not control next hop selection, and disabling them is not the correct routing fix.

D

Distractor review

Set gateway route propagation to Disabled so the NAT gateway is preferred.

Gateway route propagation affects learned gateway routes, not the precedence of a default route to a virtual appliance.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: usable hosts are not the same as total addresses

Subnetting questions often tempt you into counting all addresses. In normal IPv4 subnets, the network and broadcast addresses are not usable host addresses.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

Subnetting questions test whether you can identify the network, broadcast address, usable range, mask and correct subnet. Slow down enough to calculate the block size correctly.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • CIDR notation defines the prefix length.
  • Block size helps identify subnet boundaries.
  • Network and broadcast addresses are not usable hosts in normal IPv4 subnets.
  • The required host count determines the smallest suitable subnet.

TExam Day Tips

  • Write the block size before choosing the subnet.
  • Check whether the question asks for hosts, subnets or a specific address range.
  • Do not confuse /24, /25, /26 and /27 host counts.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

CIDR notation defines the prefix length.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Remove the 0.0.0.0/0 user-defined route and keep only specific routes for private prefixes. — The 0.0.0.0/0 UDR is forcing all internet traffic to the virtual appliance, which prevents the NAT gateway from being used. NAT gateway applies to outbound internet traffic when a more specific user-defined route does not override it. Removing the default route and retaining only specific private-prefix routes is the correct way to let internet traffic egress through NAT while still steering internal destinations as needed. Why others are wrong: Adding another NAT gateway is not a supported fix and does not address route precedence. NSGs filter traffic but do not decide the next hop. Gateway route propagation only controls whether routes learned from a gateway are added to the effective route table; it does not override a manually configured 0.0.0.0/0 route.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.