hardmultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A storage account must remain reachable through its public endpoint for an on-premises integration server, but only one Azure subnet should be allowed to access it from Azure. The team does not want private endpoints or DNS changes. What should the administrator configure?

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

A storage account must remain reachable through its public endpoint for an on-premises integration server, but only one Azure subnet should be allowed to access it from Azure. The team does not want private endpoints or DNS changes. What should the administrator configure?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Add a private endpoint and disable public network access

That would remove public endpoint access for the on-premises server, which violates the requirement.

B

Best answer

Enable a service endpoint on the subnet and add that subnet to the storage account networking rules

A service endpoint lets traffic from the chosen Azure subnet reach the storage account over the Microsoft backbone while still using the account's public endpoint. Adding the subnet to the storage account firewall rules then restricts Azure access to only that subnet. This meets the requirement to keep public access available for the on-premises integration server while tightly limiting Azure-based access without private endpoints or DNS changes.

C

Distractor review

Create a SAS token restricted to that subnet

SAS tokens control data authorization, but they cannot restrict traffic to a specific subnet.

D

Distractor review

Assign Storage Blob Data Reader to the subnet

RBAC cannot be assigned to a subnet, and data-plane permissions do not enforce network origin restrictions.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization

Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Authentication checks who the user is.
  • Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
  • Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
  • AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.

TExam Day Tips

  • Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
  • Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
  • Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Authentication checks who the user is.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Enable a service endpoint on the subnet and add that subnet to the storage account networking rules — Service endpoints combined with storage firewall rules are the correct fit when you want to keep the public endpoint available but restrict Azure access to a specific subnet. The service endpoint identifies the subnet, and the firewall rule allows only that subnet to use the account. On-premises traffic can still reach the public endpoint because public network access remains enabled. This makes the solution both secure and compatible with the mixed access pattern. Why others are wrong: A private endpoint would eliminate the public endpoint path the on-premises server still needs. SAS tokens do not enforce network location and therefore cannot meet the subnet-only requirement. RBAC assignments apply to identities, not subnets, so they are the wrong control for network restriction. The key distinction is that the problem is about network origin, not just authorization.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.