mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A finance application stores monthly invoice PDFs in Azure Blob Storage. The business wants the data to remain available if one availability zone in the region becomes unavailable, but it does not require a secondary region for read access. Which redundancy option should the administrator choose?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A finance application stores monthly invoice PDFs in Azure Blob Storage. The business wants the data to remain available if one availability zone in the region becomes unavailable, but it does not require a secondary region for read access. Which redundancy option should the administrator choose?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

LRS, because it keeps three copies within a single datacenter and is the least expensive option.

LRS protects against disk or node loss within one datacenter, but not against a zone outage. It does not meet the requirement to survive an availability zone failure.

B

Best answer

ZRS, because it replicates data across zones in the same region and stays available through a zone outage.

ZRS stores synchronous copies across multiple availability zones in one region. That design keeps the data available if one zone becomes unavailable, while avoiding the extra complexity of a secondary region.

C

Distractor review

GRS, because it keeps a readable copy in the paired region and is always the best choice for resilience.

GRS adds asynchronous replication to a secondary region, but it does not specifically protect against a zone outage in the primary region. The question does not require secondary-region read access.

D

Distractor review

RA-GRS, because it provides read access to the secondary region and is required for zone-level resilience.

RA-GRS is useful when you need read access to a secondary region, but that is not the stated requirement. It also does not directly address zone-level resilience in the primary region.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: ZRS, because it replicates data across zones in the same region and stays available through a zone outage. — Zone-redundant storage is the right choice when the business wants regional availability without needing a secondary region for reads. ZRS synchronously replicates data across multiple availability zones, so the storage account can continue to serve data if one zone fails. That makes it the best match for a workload that needs protection from a zone outage but does not require geo-replication. Why others are wrong: LRS only protects within a single datacenter, so it cannot survive a zone failure. GRS and RA-GRS add disaster recovery in a paired region, but the question specifically avoids requiring a secondary region. RA-GRS is also about readable secondary access, which is unnecessary here.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.