mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A development team stores build artifacts in Azure Blob Storage. The artifacts must remain available if one datacenter in the Azure region fails, but the business does not want to pay for replication to another region. Which redundancy option should the administrator select?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A development team stores build artifacts in Azure Blob Storage. The artifacts must remain available if one datacenter in the Azure region fails, but the business does not want to pay for replication to another region. Which redundancy option should the administrator select?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

LRS, because it keeps multiple copies in the same zone and is the cheapest option.

LRS protects against localized disk or server issues, but it does not protect against a datacenter or zone failure.

B

Best answer

ZRS, because it distributes copies across availability zones within the same region.

ZRS is the right choice when you want resilience to a datacenter or zone failure within a region without paying for geo-replication. It stores copies across multiple availability zones, which improves availability while keeping the data in a single region. That matches the requirement to stay regional but survive a datacenter outage.

C

Distractor review

GRS, because it keeps the workload available in two regions at all times.

GRS adds a secondary region, which is more than the requirement asks for and increases cost. It also does not provide zone-specific protection in the same way ZRS does.

D

Distractor review

RA-GRS, because it provides zone redundancy and read access in the secondary region.

RA-GRS provides geo-replication with read access, but it does not add zone redundancy in the primary region. The name indicates read access, not availability zone coverage.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: ZRS, because it distributes copies across availability zones within the same region. — ZRS is appropriate when the main goal is to survive a datacenter or zone failure inside a single Azure region. It keeps the data within one region, which avoids the cost and operational implications of geo-replication. In this scenario, the team explicitly does not want replication to another region, so ZRS gives the required resilience without overengineering the storage account. Why others are wrong: LRS is limited to a single location and is not resilient to a zone failure. GRS and RA-GRS both add a secondary region, which exceeds the stated requirement and adds unnecessary cost. RA-GRS still does not solve the zone-resilience requirement by itself, because the primary-side protection being asked for is specifically zone-based.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.