hardmulti selectObjective-mapped

A customer-facing service needs to survive a single datacenter outage in a zone-supported region. You do not need cross-region failover, but you do need Azure to spread instances without manual placement errors. Which two deployment choices satisfy that goal? Select two.

Question 1hardmulti select
Full question →

A customer-facing service needs to survive a single datacenter outage in a zone-supported region. You do not need cross-region failover, but you do need Azure to spread instances without manual placement errors. Which two deployment choices satisfy that goal? Select two.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Best answer

Place the VMs in different availability zones within the same region.

Spreading the workload across multiple availability zones protects against a datacenter-level failure within the region. It also keeps traffic local to the region, which matches the requirement that cross-region failover is not needed.

B

Distractor review

Use an availability set and expect it to cover a zone outage.

Availability sets protect against host and rack failures through fault and update domains, but they do not span datacenters or zones. A zone outage is outside what an availability set is designed to handle.

C

Best answer

Deploy the workload in a zone-enabled virtual machine scale set.

A zone-enabled VM scale set can place instances across zones automatically, which satisfies the need to avoid manual placement errors. It also gives you a platform-managed way to distribute instances for resilience.

D

Distractor review

Keep all instances in one zone and rely on the load balancer.

A load balancer only distributes traffic among healthy targets; it does not provide zone-level resiliency if every instance lives in the same zone. That design still fails if the zone goes down.

E

Distractor review

Use a paired region for automatic in-region zone balancing.

A paired region is useful for disaster recovery planning, but it is not an in-region zone balancing feature. The requirement calls for surviving a single datacenter outage without adding cross-region failover.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: NAT rules depend on direction and matching traffic

NAT is not only about the public address. The inside/outside interface roles and the ACL or rule that matches traffic are just as important.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

NAT questions usually test address translation, overload/PAT behaviour, static mappings and whether the right traffic is being translated. Read the interface direction and address terms carefully.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.
  • PAT allows many inside hosts to share one public address using ports.
  • Inside local and inside global describe the private and translated addresses.
  • NAT ACLs identify traffic for translation, not always security filtering.

TExam Day Tips

  • Identify inside and outside interfaces first.
  • Check whether the scenario needs static NAT, dynamic NAT or PAT.
  • Do not confuse NAT matching ACLs with normal packet-filtering intent.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Static NAT maps one inside address to one outside address.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Place the VMs in different availability zones within the same region. — To survive a datacenter outage in a zone-supported region, you need either explicit placement across different availability zones or a zone-enabled VM scale set that distributes instances for you. Both approaches keep the service in the same region while protecting against the loss of one zone. Availability sets and load balancers do not provide that level of zone resilience, and a paired region is unnecessary for this requirement. Why others are wrong: An availability set protects against host-level maintenance and failures, not a full zone outage. A single-zone design remains vulnerable because all instances share the same failure boundary. A paired region is a disaster recovery pattern, but the scenario explicitly excludes cross-region failover. The correct options are the ones that actually span zones inside the same region.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.