mediummultiple choiceObjective-mapped

A contractor should be able to view resources in one resource group for 30 days. When the contract ends, removing the contractor from the group should immediately remove access. What is the best approach?

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

A contractor should be able to view resources in one resource group for 30 days. When the contract ends, removing the contractor from the group should immediately remove access. What is the best approach?

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Good practice is not just finding the correct option. The wrong answers often show the exact trap the exam wants you to fall into.

A

Distractor review

Assign Reader directly to the contractor's user account at the resource group scope.

Direct user assignments work, but they create extra cleanup work when the contract ends. The requirement specifically asks for access to disappear when the contractor is removed from a group, so direct assignment does not match the management model.

B

Best answer

Assign Reader to an Entra ID group and add the contractor to that group.

Group-based role assignment is the best operational choice because access follows group membership rather than individual user objects. When the contractor is removed from the group, the RBAC assignment no longer applies to that person. It also makes temporary access easier to manage and reduces the risk of forgotten direct permissions.

C

Distractor review

Assign Reader at the subscription scope to the contractor so access is simple.

Subscription scope is broader than necessary and would expose more resources than the contractor needs. It also still relies on a direct user assignment, which does not satisfy the requirement for access to be controlled through group membership.

D

Distractor review

Create a CanNotDelete lock on the resource group until the contract ends.

A lock prevents certain management operations on resources, but it does not grant or revoke read access for users. It is unrelated to the need to manage contractor identity and RBAC cleanup.

Common exam trap

Common exam trap: authentication is not authorization

Logging in proves the user can authenticate. It does not automatically mean the user is allowed to enter privileged or configuration mode. Watch for AAA authorization, privilege level and command authorization details.

Technical deep dive

How to think about this question

This kind of question is testing the difference between identity and permission. A user may successfully log in to a router because authentication is working, but still fail to enter configuration mode because authorization is missing, misconfigured or mapped to a lower privilege level.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Authentication checks who the user is.
  • Authorization controls what the user is allowed to do after login.
  • Privilege levels affect access to EXEC and configuration commands.
  • AAA, TACACS+ and RADIUS can separate login success from command access.

TExam Day Tips

  • Do not assume successful login means full administrative access.
  • Look for words such as cannot enter configuration mode, privilege level, authorization or command access.
  • Separate login problems from permission problems before choosing the answer.

Related practice questions

Related AZ-104 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

More questions from this exam

Keep practising from the same exam bank, or move into a focused topic page if this question exposed a weak area.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this AZ-104 question test?

Authentication checks who the user is.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Assign Reader to an Entra ID group and add the contractor to that group. — Assigning the role to an Entra ID group is the most maintainable way to manage temporary access. The contractor can be added to the group for the duration of the engagement, and removal from the group immediately removes the effective permissions without touching the RBAC assignment itself. This pattern is safer and easier to audit than assigning the role directly to a user account. Why others are wrong: Direct user assignments require manual cleanup and do not align with the requirement to control access through group membership. A subscription scope is broader than needed and still does not solve the lifecycle problem. A resource lock does not affect authorization at all, so it cannot be used to manage contractor access.

What should I do if I get this AZ-104 question wrong?

Then try more questions from the same exam bank and focus on understanding why the wrong options are tempting.

Discussion

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.