The correct answer is separation of duties, because the scenario directly violates this core access control principle by allowing a developer both to write code and to access production databases without a separate team’s review and deployment. Separation of duties requires that critical tasks be divided among multiple individuals to prevent fraud, errors, or unauthorized changes, ensuring no single person has end-to-end control over a sensitive process. On the Systems Security Certified Practitioner SSCP exam, this concept tests your understanding of access control models and operational security, often appearing in audit scenarios where a developer’s direct production access creates a conflict of interest. A common trap is confusing this with least privilege, but the key distinction is that SoD focuses on splitting responsibilities, not just limiting permissions. Remember the memory tip: “One person, one piece of the puzzle” — if a single role can both create and deploy changes, separation of duties is broken.
SSCP Access Controls Practice Question
This SSCP practice question tests your understanding of access controls. Match the stated requirement to the specific cloud service, access model, or configuration option — many options are valid in isolation but not for this scenario. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
During a security audit, it is discovered that a developer has direct access to production databases. The policy requires that changes be reviewed and deployed by a separate team. Which control is being violated?
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Separation of duties
The scenario describes a direct violation of separation of duties (SoD), a core access control principle that requires critical tasks to be divided among multiple individuals to prevent fraud or error. In this case, the developer both writes code and has direct access to production databases, bypassing the required review and deployment by a separate team. SoD ensures no single person has end-to-end control over a sensitive process, which is essential for maintaining integrity and accountability in production environments.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
✗
Need-to-know
Why it's wrong here
Need-to-know is about information access, but the violation is about performing conflicting duties.
✗
Job rotation
Why it's wrong here
Job rotation reduces collusion risk but does not directly address the conflict of duties.
✗
Least privilege
Why it's wrong here
The developer has excessive access, but the core issue is lack of separation between development and production.
✓
Separation of duties
Why this is correct
The developer should not have direct production access; changes should go through a separate deployment team.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates confuse 'least privilege' with 'separation of duties' because both limit access, but least privilege focuses on the amount of access while separation of duties focuses on the division of conflicting responsibilities.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Separation of duties is often enforced through role-based access control (RBAC) with mutually exclusive roles, such as a 'Developer' role that cannot have write access to production databases and a 'Database Administrator' role that can. In practice, this is implemented using access control lists (ACLs) or attribute-based access control (ABAC) policies that prevent a single user from holding both roles. A real-world example is in PCI DSS compliance, where a developer cannot have both the ability to modify code and deploy it to production without a separate approval workflow.
KKey Concepts to Remember
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
→Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
→Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.
What to study next
Got this wrong? Here's your next step.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Access Controls — This question tests Access Controls — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Separation of duties — The scenario describes a direct violation of separation of duties (SoD), a core access control principle that requires critical tasks to be divided among multiple individuals to prevent fraud or error. In this case, the developer both writes code and has direct access to production databases, bypassing the required review and deployment by a separate team. SoD ensures no single person has end-to-end control over a sensitive process, which is essential for maintaining integrity and accountability in production environments.
What should I do if I get this SSCP question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
This SSCP practice question is part of Courseiva's free ISC2 certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SSCP exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.