Question 103 of 2,152
Route RedistributionmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Missing EIGRP External Routes in OSPF — Need 'match external'

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of route redistribution. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A network engineer is troubleshooting a route redistribution issue between EIGRP and OSPF. Routers R1 (EIGRP) and R2 (OSPF) are redistributing routes. The engineer notices that some EIGRP external routes (redistributed into EIGRP from another protocol) are not appearing in the OSPF database on R2. The show ip ospf database external command on R2 does not list these prefixes. What is the most likely cause?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Quick Answer

The answer is a missing `match external` keyword on the `redistribute eigrp` command under OSPF. This is correct because, by default, when redistributing from EIGRP into OSPF, only EIGRP internal routes are advertised; EIGRP external routes—those originally redistributed into EIGRP from another protocol—are excluded unless the `match external` keyword is explicitly added. On the Cisco CCNP ENARSI 300-410 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of the granular control EIGRP offers over route redistribution, often appearing as a troubleshooting question where `show ip ospf database external` reveals missing prefixes. A common trap is assuming all EIGRP routes are treated equally, but the default behavior only matches internal routes. To remember: think of EIGRP as having two “buckets”—internal and external—and OSPF’s redistribution only dips into the internal bucket unless you tell it to “match external” as well.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The redistribute eigrp command under OSPF is missing the subnets keyword.

When redistributing routes into OSPF, the 'subnets' keyword is required to include subnetted routes. Without it, OSPF only redistributes classful network routes, which can cause external EIGRP routes (which are often subnetted) to be missing from the OSPF database. The 'match external' keyword is not a valid option for the 'redistribute eigrp' command under OSPF.

Key principle: OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The redistribute eigrp command under OSPF is missing the subnets keyword.

    Why this is correct

    Correct. The missing 'subnets' keyword prevents subnetted routes (including external routes) from being redistributed into OSPF.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

  • The redistribute eigrp command under OSPF is missing the match external keyword.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. The 'match external' keyword is not a valid option for the 'redistribute eigrp' command under OSPF. The correct command does not have such a keyword.

  • EIGRP has a higher administrative distance than OSPF, causing route suppression.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. Administrative distance does not affect redistribution; it is used for route selection when multiple routes exist.

  • The OSPF process on R2 has a distribute-list blocking these routes.

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. While a distribute-list could block routes, it is less likely than the missing 'subnets' keyword, especially given the symptom of external routes not appearing.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: OSPF can fail even when IP connectivity looks correct

OSPF neighbour formation depends on matching areas, timers, network type, authentication and passive-interface behaviour. Do not choose an answer only because the devices can ping.

Trap categories for this question

  • Keyword trap

    Incorrect. The 'match external' keyword is not a valid option for the 'redistribute eigrp' command under OSPF. The correct command does not have such a keyword.

  • Command / output trap

    Incorrect. The 'match external' keyword is not a valid option for the 'redistribute eigrp' command under OSPF. The correct command does not have such a keyword.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

OSPF questions usually test the details that control adjacency and route selection. Read the neighbour state, area, router ID and interface configuration before deciding what is wrong.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.
  • Router ID selection can affect neighbour relationships and LSDB output.
  • OSPF cost influences the preferred path.
  • A route can appear in OSPF information but not become the installed route.

TExam Day Tips

  • Check area mismatch first when OSPF adjacency fails.
  • Review passive interfaces when a network is advertised but no neighbour forms.
  • Use show ip ospf neighbor and show ip route clues carefully.

Key takeaway

OSPF neighbour adjacency depends on matching area, hello/dead timers, network type, and authentication — IP reachability alone is not enough.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

Visual reference

R1 R2 R3 R4 10 100 10 100 OSPF picks R1→R2→R4 (cost 20) over R1→R3→R4 (cost 200)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

Route Redistribution — This question tests Route Redistribution — OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The redistribute eigrp command under OSPF is missing the subnets keyword. — When redistributing routes into OSPF, the 'subnets' keyword is required to include subnetted routes. Without it, OSPF only redistributes classful network routes, which can cause external EIGRP routes (which are often subnetted) to be missing from the OSPF database. The 'match external' keyword is not a valid option for the 'redistribute eigrp' command under OSPF.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Review OSPF neighbour requirements — matching area type, hello and dead timers, network type, stub flags, and authentication. Study show ip ospf neighbor states (INIT, 2-WAY, FULL). Then practise related 300-410 OSPF questions on adjacency and route selection.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

OSPF neighbours must agree on key parameters.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 300-410 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 18, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.