Question 2,120 of 2,152
IPv6 Traffic Filtering and uRPFhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

ACL Permitting Only EIGRP Blocks Data Traffic After Redistribution

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of ipv6 traffic filtering and urpf. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An enterprise uses EIGRP for IPv6 with route redistribution from a static route. R1 has a static route 2001:db8:0::/32 via Null0 redistributed into EIGRP. R2 receives this route and has a more specific route 2001:db8:1::/32 via a different interface. R2 has an IPv6 ACL applied inbound on the interface facing R1 that permits only EIGRP and denies all other traffic. R2's uRPF is configured in loose mode. Traffic from R2 to 2001:db8:2::1 fails. R2 shows 'show ipv6 route' has both routes, but 'show ipv6 cef' shows the summary route for 2001:db8:2::1 pointing to R1. What is the root cause?

Quick Answer

The root cause is that the summary route 2001:db8:0::/32 on R1 points to Null0, causing traffic to be dropped at R1. This occurs because R2’s CEF table shows the less specific summary route for the destination 2001:db8:2::1, forwarding traffic out the interface toward R1, where the Null0 static route silently discards it. The IPv6 ACL permitting only EIGRP is a red herring—since it is applied inbound on R2’s interface facing R1, it does not filter outbound data traffic from R2, and uRPF loose mode only verifies a return route exists, not the forwarding interface. On the Cisco CCNP ENARSI 300-410 exam, this scenario tests your ability to distinguish between ACL filtering direction and routing blackholing, a common trap where candidates blame the ACL instead of the summary route. Remember: when EIGRP redistribution introduces a Null0 summary, it can override more specific paths in the FIB, silently dropping traffic regardless of ACLs or uRPF.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The summary route 2001:db8:0::/32 on R1 points to Null0, causing traffic to be dropped at R1.

The correct answer is A because R1's static route 2001:db8:0::/32 via Null0 is redistributed into EIGRP, and R2 learns this summary route. When R2 sends traffic to 2001:db8:2::1, the CEF table (show ipv6 cef) shows the longest prefix match for 2001:db8:2::1 is the summary 2001:db8:0::/32 pointing to R1, not the more specific 2001:db8:1::/32. R1 then forwards the packet to Null0 (a virtual interface that drops traffic), causing the failure. The more specific route 2001:db8:1::/32 on R2 is not used because 2001:db8:2::1 does not fall within that prefix.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The summary route 2001:db8:0::/32 on R1 points to Null0, causing traffic to be dropped at R1.

    Why this is correct

    R2 forwards traffic to R1 based on the summary route, but R1's static route to Null0 drops it. The ACL is irrelevant to this failure.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The ACL on R2 blocks the return traffic from R1, causing asymmetric routing.

    Why it's wrong here

    The ACL is inbound on R2, so it filters traffic coming into R2, not going out.

  • uRPF loose mode drops the packet because the source address is not in the FIB.

    Why it's wrong here

    Loose mode only requires a route in the FIB, which exists.

  • EIGRP redistribution of the static route creates a routing loop between R1 and R2.

    Why it's wrong here

    There is no loop; the traffic is simply dropped at R1.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Cisco often tests the distinction between the routing table (RIB) and CEF (FIB), where candidates assume that a more specific route in the RIB will be used for forwarding, but CEF may use a different prefix if the destination does not match the more specific prefix exactly.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

CEF (Cisco Express Forwarding) uses the FIB (Forwarding Information Base) for packet switching, and the FIB performs longest prefix match independently of the routing table. In this scenario, the more specific route 2001:db8:1::/32 is in the routing table but does not cover 2001:db8:2::1, so CEF correctly uses the summary route 2001:db8:0::/32. The Null0 interface is a virtual interface that drops all traffic sent to it, commonly used to prevent routing loops when summarizing or discarding traffic. Real-world scenarios often involve misconfigured summarization or redistribution of Null0 routes causing blackholing of traffic that should use a more specific path.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security administrator must allow nursing staff to reach a patient records server while blocking access from the guest Wi-Fi VLAN. After applying an extended ACL, traffic is still blocked from nursing workstations. The ACL was applied outbound instead of inbound on the wrong interface. Questions like this test ACL direction and placement rules.

Visual reference

Source Router + ACL permit 10.0.0.0/8 deny any Server 10.0.0.5 ✓ 192.168.1.1 ✗ dropped ACLs evaluate top-down; first match wins — implicit deny all at end

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

IPv6 Traffic Filtering and uRPF — This question tests IPv6 Traffic Filtering and uRPF — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The summary route 2001:db8:0::/32 on R1 points to Null0, causing traffic to be dropped at R1. — The correct answer is A because R1's static route 2001:db8:0::/32 via Null0 is redistributed into EIGRP, and R2 learns this summary route. When R2 sends traffic to 2001:db8:2::1, the CEF table (show ipv6 cef) shows the longest prefix match for 2001:db8:2::1 is the summary 2001:db8:0::/32 pointing to R1, not the more specific 2001:db8:1::/32. R1 then forwards the packet to Null0 (a virtual interface that drops traffic), causing the failure. The more specific route 2001:db8:1::/32 on R2 is not used because 2001:db8:2::1 does not fall within that prefix.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 300-410 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.