Question 874 of 2,152
IP SLAhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

IP SLA and EIGRP: Why Tracking Doesn't Work

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of ip sla. This is a configuration task: choose the command set that satisfies every stated requirement. Small differences — like 'secret' vs 'password' or 'transport input ssh' vs 'all' — change whether the answer is correct. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

An engineer configured IP SLA 20 to monitor the reachability of a next-hop router (192.168.1.1) using UDP jitter probes. The goal is to use the IP SLA with a track object to influence EIGRP route selection. However, the EIGRP route is not being affected by the IP SLA state. The engineer verifies that the IP SLA is 'Active' and the track object shows 'Up'. What is the most likely misconfiguration?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

Quick Answer

The answer is that EIGRP does not support direct tracking of IP SLA for route metrics, so the track object must be applied to a static route or redistribution policy rather than to EIGRP itself. The core technical concept is that IP SLA tracking operates at the interface or static route level, not within EIGRP’s dynamic routing process; EIGRP selects routes based on its composite metric and neighbor reachability, not on the state of a track object. On the Cisco CCNP ENARSI 300-410 exam, this tests your understanding of how IP SLA and EIGRP interact—a common trap is assuming that a track object tied to an IP SLA will automatically influence EIGRP’s routing table, but in reality, you must use a tracked static route as a floating default or manipulate redistribution to affect EIGRP’s decision. The search intent “IP SLA not affecting EIGRP” often arises when engineers forget that EIGRP ignores track objects natively. Memory tip: “EIGRP tracks neighbors, not SLA probes—static or redistribute to make it notice.”

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

The track object is not configured to influence the EIGRP route; EIGRP does not support direct tracking of IP SLA for route metrics.

EIGRP does not natively react to IP SLA track objects unless the route is redistributed or a static route with tracking is used. The engineer likely expected EIGRP to automatically adjust metric based on IP SLA, which is not supported.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • The IP SLA probe type (UDP jitter) is not supported for tracking EIGRP routes.

    Why it's wrong here

    UDP jitter is supported for IP SLA; the probe type is not the issue.

  • The track object is not configured to influence the EIGRP route; EIGRP does not support direct tracking of IP SLA for route metrics.

    Why this is correct

    EIGRP does not have a mechanism to directly track IP SLA states. The engineer must use a tracked static route or policy-based routing to influence traffic.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "most likely" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • The EIGRP route has a higher administrative distance than the tracked route.

    Why it's wrong here

    Administrative distance is not related to IP SLA tracking; the route is still present but not affected by the track state.

  • The IP SLA threshold is set too low, causing flapping.

    Why it's wrong here

    The track object shows 'Up', so the threshold is not causing flapping.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Many certification questions include familiar terms but test a specific constraint. Read the exact wording before choosing an answer that is generally true but wrong for this case.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    The track object shows 'Up', so the threshold is not causing flapping.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

This question should be treated as a scenario, not a definition check. Identify the problem, the constraint and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
  • Use explanations to understand the rule behind the answer.

TExam Day Tips

  • Underline the problem statement mentally.
  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the 300-410 exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which 300-410 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

IP SLA — This question tests IP SLA — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: The track object is not configured to influence the EIGRP route; EIGRP does not support direct tracking of IP SLA for route metrics. — EIGRP does not natively react to IP SLA track objects unless the route is redistributed or a static route with tracking is used. The engineer likely expected EIGRP to automatically adjust metric based on IP SLA, which is not supported.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Identify which 300-410 exam domain this question belongs to, then review the specific concept being tested. Practise related questions in that domain and focus on understanding why each wrong answer is tempting — not just why the correct answer is right.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 300-410 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 19, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.