Question 1,963 of 2,152
EIGRP TroubleshootinghardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

EIGRP Feasibility Condition

This 300-410 practice question tests your understanding of eigrp troubleshooting. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. A key principle to apply: split Horizon. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Which EIGRP loop prevention mechanism prevents a router from installing a route that was originally learned from itself?

Quick Answer

The answer is the feasibility condition. This EIGRP loop prevention mechanism is correct because it enforces the rule that a router will only accept a route from a neighbor if that neighbor’s reported distance (RD) is strictly less than the router’s own feasible distance (FD) to that destination. By ensuring the neighbor’s path is closer to the destination than the current best path, the feasibility condition guarantees that the route cannot have been learned from the router itself, thus preventing a routing loop. On the Cisco CCNP ENARSI 300-410 exam, this concept often appears in questions about Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL) operation, where a common trap is confusing the feasibility condition with the successor or feasible successor selection. Remember that the feasibility condition is a strict inequality—RD must be less than FD, not less than or equal. A simple memory tip: “Reported Distance must be Less than Feasible Distance” or “RD < FD for a Feasible Successor.”

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Split horizon

Split horizon prevents a router from advertising a route back out the interface from which it was learned, thereby preventing the router from receiving and installing a route that originated from itself. This is the primary loop prevention mechanism that stops self-originated routes from being accepted. The feasibility condition in EIGRP ensures loop-free paths by requiring that the reported distance from a neighbor be less than the feasible distance, but it does not specifically prevent self-originated route acceptance.

Key principle: Split Horizon

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Split horizon

    Why this is correct

    Correct. Split horizon prohibits a router from sending an update about a route out the same interface it was learned on, thus preventing the router from learning a route it originally advertised.

    Related concept

    Split Horizon

  • Route poisoning

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. Route poisoning is used to mark a route as unreachable (infinite metric) and advertise it to neighbors, but it does not prevent a router from accepting a self-originated route.

  • Feasibility condition

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. The feasibility condition ensures loop-free path selection by comparing reported distance to feasible distance, but it does not directly prevent acceptance of a route that originated from the router itself.

  • Hold-down timer

    Why it's wrong here

    Incorrect. Hold-down timers are used in distance-vector protocols to prevent flapping routes from being prematurely accepted, but they do not specifically prevent self-originated route acceptance.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

Candidates often confuse the feasibility condition with split horizon. While both prevent loops, split horizon specifically stops a router from installing a route it originated.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Treat this as a scenario question. Identify the problem, the constraint, and the best action. Then compare each option against those facts.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Split Horizon
  • Feasibility Condition

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Split Horizon

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A network engineer at a university connects two campus buildings via a fibre link. Both routers run OSPF, but no adjacency forms — even though both routers can ping each other. The engineer finds one router is in area 0 and the other in area 1. OSPF adjacency requires matching area numbers, hello/dead timers, and network type. IP reachability alone is not enough.

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Review split Horizon, then practise related 300-410 questions on the same topic to reinforce the concept.

Related practice questions

Related 300-410 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free 300-410 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this 300-410 question test?

EIGRP Troubleshooting — This question tests EIGRP Troubleshooting — Split Horizon.

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Split horizon — Split horizon prevents a router from advertising a route back out the interface from which it was learned, thereby preventing the router from receiving and installing a route that originated from itself. This is the primary loop prevention mechanism that stops self-originated routes from being accepted. The feasibility condition in EIGRP ensures loop-free paths by requiring that the reported distance from a neighbor be less than the feasible distance, but it does not specifically prevent self-originated route acceptance.

What should I do if I get this 300-410 question wrong?

Review split Horizon, then practise related 300-410 questions on the same topic to reinforce the concept.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Split Horizon

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More 300-410 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 18, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This 300-410 practice question is part of Courseiva's free Cisco certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the 300-410 exam.