An administrator notices that traffic to a particular subnet is being load-balanced across two WAN links, but they want all traffic to that subnet to use a single link. Which feature should be configured?
Policy routing (also called policy-based routing) uses a route map to match specific packet attributes—such as source IP, destination IP, or protocol—and forwards those packets to a defined next-hop or interface, bypassing the normal longest-prefix-match routing table lookup. For traffic to a particular subnet, this allows an administrator to override the default routing decision and force that traffic out a specific interface, which is exactly what the scenario requires.
Why this answer
Policy routing (also called PBR) allows you to override the routing table based on criteria such as source/destination IP, protocol, or port. By configuring a policy route that matches traffic to the specific subnet and sets the output interface to a single WAN link, you can force all that traffic to use one link instead of being load-balanced.
Exam trap
The trap here is that candidates often confuse ECMP load-balancing with the ability to pin traffic to a single link, mistakenly thinking that adjusting ECMP weights or distances will achieve the same result as policy routing.
How to eliminate wrong answers
Option B is wrong because ECMP (Equal-Cost Multi-Path) routing is exactly what causes load-balancing across multiple equal-cost routes; disabling or not using ECMP would not selectively force traffic to a single link without affecting other traffic. Option C is wrong because a static route with a higher distance would only be used as a backup if the primary route fails, but it does not prevent load-balancing when multiple equal-cost routes exist. Option D is wrong because route summarization aggregates multiple subnets into a single prefix to reduce routing table size, but it does not control which link is used for traffic to a specific subnet.