Which TWO types of logs are most useful for detecting lateral movement?
Windows Security logon events (4624, 4625, 4648) record logon type, source workstation and account, exposing pass-the-hash or remote interactive logons that reveal lateral movement across hosts. This directly satisfies the stem's requirement to detect movement between systems, which firewall or application logs cannot show.
Why this answer
Windows Event Log logon events (Option C) are correct because lateral movement typically involves remote authentication, so Security log events such as 4624 (successful logon) with Logon Type 3 (network) or Type 10 (RemoteInteractive/RDP), plus 4625 failures and 4648 explicit-credential logons, reveal attacker pivoting between hosts. Network flow logs for SMB/RDP (Option D) are correct because lateral movement commonly uses TCP 445 (SMB) and TCP 3389 (RDP), and flow records showing internal host-to-host connections to these ports expose the movement path even when endpoint logging is incomplete. Option A (system temperature logs) is irrelevant because thermal data reflects hardware health, not authentication or connection activity.
Option B (application logs) can occasionally show exploitation or service abuse but are not primarily designed to record logon or network-session evidence of lateral movement. Option E (printer spooler logs) relates to print jobs and the PrintNightmare vector at most, not to the authentication and connection patterns that characterize lateral movement.
Exam trap
The trap is that candidates pick application logs because they think 'logs are logs,' but lateral movement is about authentication and network connections, not application behavior — the exam tests whether you know which log sources actually capture identity and east-west traffic.