Quick Answer
The answer is erasing tracks. This step in the CHPSET methodology occurs after an attacker has successfully gained access and must cover their footprints to avoid detection. By deleting the log entries for the session, the attacker removes the audit trail that would reveal their unauthorized activity, including the failed attempts and the successful login from an unusual IP address. On the Certified Ethical Hacker CEH exam, this concept tests your understanding of the post-exploitation phase, where attackers focus on stealth and persistence. A common trap is confusing erasing tracks with maintaining access, but remember that erasing tracks is about hiding evidence, not preserving entry. To recall the CHPSET order, use the mnemonic “Cats Have Pretty Soft, Elegant Tails,” where the final “T” stands for erasing tracks—the last step before the attacker fully disappears.
This CEH practice question tests your understanding of enumeration and system hacking. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
A security analyst finds multiple failed login attempts in the system logs, followed by a successful login from an unusual IP address. The attacker then deleted the log entries for that session. Which step of the system hacking methodology (CHPSET) does the log deletion represent?
Spying
Why wrong: Spying involves monitoring activity, not erasing evidence.
Executing applications
Why wrong: Executing applications refers to running tools or malware on the target.
Cracking passwords
Why wrong: Cracking passwords is about obtaining credentials, not removing logs.
Erasing tracks
Deleting log entries is a classic example of erasing tracks to avoid detection.
Answer choices
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
Erasing tracks
The log deletion represents the 'Erasing tracks' step in the CHPSET methodology. After gaining unauthorized access, attackers must cover their footprints by removing evidence of their activities, such as clearing system logs, modifying timestamps, or deleting audit trails. This ensures the intrusion remains undetected by system administrators or security monitoring tools.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
Spying
Why it's wrong here
Spying involves monitoring activity, not erasing evidence.
Executing applications
Why it's wrong here
Executing applications refers to running tools or malware on the target.
Cracking passwords
Why it's wrong here
Cracking passwords is about obtaining credentials, not removing logs.
Erasing tracks
Why this is correct
Deleting log entries is a classic example of erasing tracks to avoid detection.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Common exam traps
The trap here is confusing 'Erasing tracks' with 'Spying' because both involve post-exploitation actions, but spying focuses on data collection while erasing tracks specifically targets log and evidence removal.
Detailed technical explanation
On Windows systems, attackers may use `wevtutil cl` to clear specific event logs (e.g., Security, System) or `fsutil` to zero out log files. On Linux, they might truncate `/var/log/auth.log` or use `shred` to overwrite log entries. In a real-world scenario, an attacker could also modify the `auditd` configuration to disable logging before executing commands, then re-enable it, leaving no trace of their session.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
A practitioner preparing for the CEH exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.
What to study next
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Enumeration and System Hacking — study guide chapter
Learn the concepts, then practise the questions
Enumeration and System Hacking practice questions
Targeted practice on this topic area only
All CEH questions
1,010 questions across all exam domains
Certified Ethical Hacker CEH study guide
Full concept coverage aligned to exam objectives
CEH practice test guide
How to use practice tests most effectively before exam day
Related practice questions
Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.
Practise CEH questions linked to Footprinting, Reconnaissance and Scanning.
Practise CEH questions linked to Enumeration and System Hacking.
Practise CEH questions linked to Malware, Social Engineering and Network Attacks.
Practise CEH questions linked to Web Application and Injection Attacks.
Practise CEH questions linked to Introduction to Ethical Hacking.
Practise CEH questions linked to Scanning Networks and Enumeration.
Practise CEH questions linked to Vulnerability Analysis and System Hacking.
Practise CEH questions linked to Advanced Topics: Wireless, Cloud, IoT, Cryptography.
Practise CEH questions linked to Footprinting and Reconnaissance.
Practise CEH questions linked to Network and Web Application Attacks.
Practise CEH questions linked to Wireless, IoT and Cloud Security.
Practise CEH questions linked to Cryptography and Malware Analysis.
Practice this exam
Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.
FAQ
Enumeration and System Hacking — This question tests Enumeration and System Hacking — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
The correct answer is: Erasing tracks — The log deletion represents the 'Erasing tracks' step in the CHPSET methodology. After gaining unauthorized access, attackers must cover their footprints by removing evidence of their activities, such as clearing system logs, modifying timestamps, or deleting audit trails. This ensures the intrusion remains undetected by system administrators or security monitoring tools.
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 24, 2026
This CEH practice question is part of Courseiva's free EC-Council certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the CEH exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.