Question 785 of 1,152
Security Program Management and OversightmediumMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is to update the third-party risk assessment and require evidence of the subcontractor’s controls before approval. This is correct because introducing a new subcontractor in a different country constitutes a material change to the data processing environment, which invalidates the original assessment. Security must perform a new third-party risk assessment focused on the subcontractor’s controls—such as encryption standards, data protection policies, and compliance with local regulations—to ensure the change does not increase exposure. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this scenario tests your understanding of vendor risk management and the principle that risk assessments must be updated whenever the supply chain changes, even if the primary provider passed initial review. A common trap is assuming the primary provider’s approval covers all subcontractors, but the exam emphasizes that each new link in the chain requires independent validation. Remember the mnemonic “New Sub, New Check”—any new subcontractor triggers a fresh assessment.

SY0-701 Security Program Management and Oversight Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of security program management and oversight. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A payroll SaaS provider has passed initial review, but before contract signing it announces that customer data will be processed by a new subcontractor in another country. The business wants to keep the onboarding timeline short, but security still needs assurance that the change does not increase exposure. What is the BEST next step?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "best"

    Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

Question 1mediummultiple choice
Full question →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Update the third-party risk assessment and require evidence of the subcontractor's controls before approval.

The correct answer is B because the introduction of a new subcontractor in a different country represents a material change to the data processing environment, which invalidates the initial risk assessment. Security must update the third-party risk assessment to evaluate the subcontractor's controls, such as data protection, encryption standards, and compliance with local regulations, before approval. This ensures that the change does not increase exposure, even if the primary provider passed initial review.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Approve the vendor because the primary provider already passed the initial review.

    Why it's wrong here

    The initial review is no longer sufficient because the service model has changed. New subcontractors can introduce new legal, privacy, and security risk.

  • Update the third-party risk assessment and require evidence of the subcontractor's controls before approval.

    Why this is correct

    This is the best next step because the change in subcontracting materially alters the risk profile. Security should reassess the provider, review the downstream party's controls, and confirm contractual obligations such as incident notification, data handling, and location requirements. This balances speed with due diligence and ensures the organization has current evidence before customer data is exposed to a new party.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Wait until the first quarterly audit to review the subcontractor change.

    Why it's wrong here

    Delaying review increases exposure. A new subcontractor affecting payroll data should be assessed before go-live, not after the fact.

  • Accept the change if the vendor provides a marketing brochure describing its security program.

    Why it's wrong here

    Marketing materials are not evidence of control effectiveness. Security needs verifiable documentation, not promotional statements.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates assume passing initial review means all future changes are automatically acceptable, overlooking the need for reassessment when the data processing environment changes, especially with a new subcontractor in a different country.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Third-party risk assessments often include reviewing SOC 2 Type II reports, ISO 27001 certifications, or data processing agreements (DPAs) that specify subcontractor obligations. Under frameworks like GDPR or PCI DSS, the primary provider remains liable for subcontractor actions, so due diligence must include verifying the subcontractor's compliance with the same standards, such as encryption at rest (AES-256) and in transit (TLS 1.2+), and incident response procedures. A real-world scenario is a cloud SaaS provider using a sub-processor in a jurisdiction with weaker data protection laws, which could expose customer data to unauthorized access or legal requests.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A developer is choosing between AES-256 (symmetric) and RSA-2048 (asymmetric) for encrypting a large file that will be sent to a partner. Symmetric encryption is fast but requires key exchange; asymmetric is slower but solves the key distribution problem. A hybrid approach — encrypt the file with AES, encrypt the AES key with RSA — is standard. Questions like this test whether you understand when each approach applies.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Security Program Management and Oversight — This question tests Security Program Management and Oversight — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Update the third-party risk assessment and require evidence of the subcontractor's controls before approval. — The correct answer is B because the introduction of a new subcontractor in a different country represents a material change to the data processing environment, which invalidates the initial risk assessment. Security must update the third-party risk assessment to evaluate the subcontractor's controls, such as data protection, encryption standards, and compliance with local regulations, before approval. This ensures that the change does not increase exposure, even if the primary provider passed initial review.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "best". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More SY0-701 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.