The answer is separation of duties, because no single user should be able to complete every high-risk finance step alone. This principle reduces fraud risk by dividing critical tasks—such as creating, approving, and releasing a payment—among at least two people, ensuring that collusion is required to commit internal fraud while keeping the business process functional. On the Security+ SY-701 exam, this concept tests your understanding of how to apply administrative controls to prevent insider threats without disrupting workflow; a common trap is confusing it with least privilege, which limits access but does not enforce dual custody. Remember the memory tip: “Two sets of eyes keep the fraud from flying”—if one person can initiate and approve a transaction, the control is broken.
SY0-701 General Security Concepts Practice Question
This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of general security concepts. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.
Exhibit
Finance change workflow:
Step 1: Create vendor record - AP Clerk
Step 2: Enter invoice - AP Clerk
Step 3: Approve payment above $5,000 - AP Manager
Step 4: Update bank account - Treasury Admin
Finding:
The shared account finance_ops can perform all four steps, and two employees use the same credentials for convenience.
Based on the exhibit, which principle should the organization enforce to reduce fraud risk while keeping the business process functional?
Finance change workflow:
Step 1: Create vendor record - AP Clerk
Step 2: Enter invoice - AP Clerk
Step 3: Approve payment above $5,000 - AP Manager
Step 4: Update bank account - Treasury Admin
Finding:
The shared account finance_ops can perform all four steps, and two employees use the same credentials for convenience.
A
Least privilege, because each employee should only have the fewest permissions needed for the shared account.
Why wrong: Least privilege is important, but the real issue is broader than simply reducing permissions. The problem is that one identity can complete the full payment workflow, which allows a single person to create, approve, and alter payment data. That concentration of power is what creates the fraud risk, so the better principle is separation of duties.
B
Separation of duties, because no single user should be able to complete every high-risk finance step alone.
Separation of duties is the best answer because the workflow shows one shared identity can create vendors, enter invoices, approve payments, and change bank details. That concentration enables fraud without a second set of eyes. Splitting those tasks across different roles prevents one person from controlling the entire transaction chain and creates accountability for each critical step.
C
Need-to-know, because only employees with confidential financial data should see the workflow details.
Why wrong: Need-to-know limits access to information, not necessarily to the ability to complete an entire business transaction. The exhibit is about who can perform which finance actions, not who can read a report. Restricting data visibility may help privacy, but it does not address the fraud risk created by one account being able to execute every step.
D
Defense in depth, because the organization should add more security layers around the finance process.
Why wrong: Defense in depth means multiple layers of protection, such as logging, approvals, and monitoring. Those layers can help, but they do not specifically solve the core issue shown in the workflow. The exhibit reveals a role-concentration problem, where one identity can complete the entire process. That is precisely what separation of duties is designed to prevent.
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
Separation of duties, because no single user should be able to complete every high-risk finance step alone.
Separation of duties (SoD) is the correct principle because it prevents any single employee from completing all steps in a high-risk financial transaction alone. By requiring at least two people to authorize and execute critical actions—such as initiating a payment and approving it—the organization reduces the risk of internal fraud without blocking the business workflow. This directly addresses the scenario where a single user could otherwise create, approve, and release a fraudulent payment.
Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
✗
Least privilege, because each employee should only have the fewest permissions needed for the shared account.
Why it's wrong here
Least privilege is important, but the real issue is broader than simply reducing permissions. The problem is that one identity can complete the full payment workflow, which allows a single person to create, approve, and alter payment data. That concentration of power is what creates the fraud risk, so the better principle is separation of duties.
✓
Separation of duties, because no single user should be able to complete every high-risk finance step alone.
Why this is correct
Separation of duties is the best answer because the workflow shows one shared identity can create vendors, enter invoices, approve payments, and change bank details. That concentration enables fraud without a second set of eyes. Splitting those tasks across different roles prevents one person from controlling the entire transaction chain and creates accountability for each critical step.
Related concept
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
✗
Need-to-know, because only employees with confidential financial data should see the workflow details.
Why it's wrong here
Need-to-know limits access to information, not necessarily to the ability to complete an entire business transaction. The exhibit is about who can perform which finance actions, not who can read a report. Restricting data visibility may help privacy, but it does not address the fraud risk created by one account being able to execute every step.
✗
Defense in depth, because the organization should add more security layers around the finance process.
Why it's wrong here
Defense in depth means multiple layers of protection, such as logging, approvals, and monitoring. Those layers can help, but they do not specifically solve the core issue shown in the workflow. The exhibit reveals a role-concentration problem, where one identity can complete the entire process. That is precisely what separation of duties is designed to prevent.
Common exam traps
Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword
The trap here is that candidates confuse least privilege (which limits permissions for a single user) with separation of duties (which splits a process across multiple users), even though the exhibit clearly shows a sequential workflow where a single user could perform all steps.
Trap categories for this question
Command / output trap
Defense in depth means multiple layers of protection, such as logging, approvals, and monitoring. Those layers can help, but they do not specifically solve the core issue shown in the workflow. The exhibit reveals a role-concentration problem, where one identity can complete the entire process. That is precisely what separation of duties is designed to prevent.
Detailed technical explanation
How to think about this question
Separation of duties is a foundational internal control in financial systems, often enforced through dual-approval workflows in ERP platforms like SAP or Oracle. Under the hood, this requires distinct user roles (e.g., 'AP Clerk' and 'AP Manager') with mutually exclusive permissions, so that no single role can both create a purchase order and approve payment. In real-world scenarios, a lack of SoD enabled the $3.5 billion fraud at Wirecard, where one employee controlled both transaction initiation and reconciliation.
KKey Concepts to Remember
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.
TExam Day Tips
→Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
→Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.
Key takeaway
Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.
Real-world example
How this comes up in practice
A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.
Related glossary terms
Concepts from this question explained
These glossary pages explain the core terms tested in this SY0-701 question in full detail.
General Security Concepts — This question tests General Security Concepts — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..
What is the correct answer to this question?
The correct answer is: Separation of duties, because no single user should be able to complete every high-risk finance step alone. — Separation of duties (SoD) is the correct principle because it prevents any single employee from completing all steps in a high-risk financial transaction alone. By requiring at least two people to authorize and execute critical actions—such as initiating a payment and approving it—the organization reduces the risk of internal fraud without blocking the business workflow. This directly addresses the scenario where a single user could otherwise create, approve, and release a fraudulent payment.
What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?
Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.
What is the key concept behind this question?
Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
These questions test the same concept from different angles. Work through them to make sure you can recognise it however the exam phrases it.
Variation 1. Based on the exhibit, which security principle is the proposed workflow most directly enforcing?
hard
A.Least privilege, because each person gets only the minimum access needed for the task.
B.Defense in depth, because multiple layers of security are added around firewall changes.
✓ C.Separation of duties, because no single person can create, approve, and implement the same production change.
D.Need-to-know, because the ticket is visible only to assigned people.
Why C: The proposed workflow enforces separation of duties by requiring three distinct roles—requester, approver, and implementer—to complete a single firewall change. No single person can both create and approve the change, nor can they implement it without prior approval. This directly prevents any one individual from having end-to-end control over a production change, which is the core of separation of duties.
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.