Question 1,115 of 1,152
Threats, Vulnerabilities, and MitigationshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

Quick Answer

The answer is rootkit, as this malware type is specifically designed to achieve stealth and persistence by modifying the operating system’s kernel or system calls to hide files, processes, and network connections from security tools. This behavior directly explains the exhibit’s indicators, such as concealed processes or intercepted system calls, which are hallmarks of rootkit activity. On the Security+ SY0-701 exam, this tests your ability to distinguish rootkits from other malware like Trojans or worms, which lack deep system-level hiding capabilities. A common trap is confusing rootkits with bootkits—remember that rootkits operate at the kernel level after the OS loads, while bootkits infect the Master Boot Record before boot. For a quick memory tip, think of a rootkit as a “root-level spy” that buries itself in the system’s core to avoid detection.

SY0-701 Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations Practice Question

This SY0-701 practice question tests your understanding of threats, vulnerabilities, and mitigations. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

Exhibit

Administrator checks a suspected host:
tasklist /svc | findstr vpn
(no output)

netstat -ano | findstr 51433
TCP    0.0.0.0:51433     0.0.0.0:0     LISTENING     4

driverquery /v | findstr /i kbdflt2
kbdflt2.sys    Unknown    C:\Windows\System32\drivers\kbdflt2.sys

EDR note:
Process enumeration from user mode does not match kernel event telemetry.

Based on the exhibit, which malware type best explains the behavior?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "best"

    Why it matters: Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Full question →

Exhibit

Administrator checks a suspected host:
tasklist /svc | findstr vpn
(no output)

netstat -ano | findstr 51433
TCP    0.0.0.0:51433     0.0.0.0:0     LISTENING     4

driverquery /v | findstr /i kbdflt2
kbdflt2.sys    Unknown    C:\Windows\System32\drivers\kbdflt2.sys

EDR note:
Process enumeration from user mode does not match kernel event telemetry.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Rootkit

A rootkit is designed to hide its presence and the presence of other malware by modifying the operating system's kernel or system calls, allowing it to evade detection by security tools. The exhibit likely shows behavior such as file hiding, process concealment, or system call interception, which are hallmarks of rootkit activity. This aligns with the SY0-701 objective on understanding malware types and their characteristics.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Trojan

    Why it's wrong here

    A trojan disguises itself as legitimate software, but the key clue here is concealment of system activity from user-mode tools.

  • Rootkit

    Why this is correct

    The exhibit shows a hidden listener associated with PID 4, an unsigned driver, and a mismatch between user-mode process enumeration and kernel telemetry. Those are classic rootkit indicators because rootkits operate at a low level to conceal processes, ports, or files from standard tools. The suspicious driver name and kernel-level inconsistency are especially strong clues that the malware is trying to hide itself from the operating system and defenders.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "best" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • Logic bomb

    Why it's wrong here

    A logic bomb waits for a condition or date before triggering a payload, such as deletion or encryption, which is not the main clue shown here.

  • Spyware

    Why it's wrong here

    Spyware focuses on stealthy information collection, but the exhibit specifically shows kernel-level concealment and hidden listening services.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates often confuse a rootkit's stealth capabilities with a Trojan's deceptive delivery method, failing to recognize that the exhibit's focus on hiding and persistence at the OS level is unique to rootkits, not general malware types.

Trap categories for this question

  • Command / output trap

    A logic bomb waits for a condition or date before triggering a payload, such as deletion or encryption, which is not the main clue shown here.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Rootkits often operate at ring 0 (kernel mode) by hooking system calls like NtQuerySystemInformation or modifying the System Service Dispatch Table (SSDT) to filter out their own processes and files from API results. In real-world scenarios, rootkits like the Sony BMG XCP rootkit used driver-level cloaking to hide digital rights management software, causing widespread security concerns. Understanding the difference between user-mode rootkits (which hook user-space APIs) and kernel-mode rootkits (which modify the kernel) is critical for incident response.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A security analyst at a medium-sized enterprise encounters this scenario during an investigation or architecture review. The correct answer reflects best practice for the specific threat or control described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Security exam questions test whether you can match controls to threats in context — not just recall definitions.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related SY0-701 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free SY0-701 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this SY0-701 question test?

Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — This question tests Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: Rootkit — A rootkit is designed to hide its presence and the presence of other malware by modifying the operating system's kernel or system calls, allowing it to evade detection by security tools. The exhibit likely shows behavior such as file hiding, process concealment, or system call interception, which are hallmarks of rootkit activity. This aligns with the SY0-701 objective on understanding malware types and their characteristics.

What should I do if I get this SY0-701 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "best". Signals that multiple options may be partially correct. Choose the option that most directly solves the exact problem described, not the one that sounds most complete.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Keep practising

More SY0-701 practice questions

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This SY0-701 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the SY0-701 exam.