Courseiva
Question 466 of 464
Network ImplementationhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

N10-009 Network Implementation Practice Question

A network administrator is configuring dynamic routing between two routers in the same organization. The routers must support VLSM, converge quickly, and use a metric that is based on bandwidth and delay. Which routing protocol should be configured?

⚠ Common exam trap

A common mix-up: candidates choose OSPF because it is a widely used link-state protocol that supports VLSM and converges quickly, but they overlook the specific requirement for a metric based on both bandwidth and delay, which is unique to EIGRP's default composite metric.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

EIGRP

C is correct because EIGRP is a Cisco-proprietary hybrid routing protocol that supports Variable-Length Subnet Masking (VLSM), converges rapidly using the Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL), and uses a composite metric that by default includes bandwidth and delay. This makes it ideal for the scenario where both VLSM support and fast convergence are required with a metric based on bandwidth and delay.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • RIP

    Why it's wrong here

    Routing Information Protocol (RIP) is an older distance-vector protocol that uses hop count as its sole metric, severely limiting its ability to select optimal paths in complex networks. RIPv1 is classful and does not support VLSM, while RIPv2 supports VLSM but still suffers from slow convergence and a maximum hop count of 15, making it unsuitable for large or modern network environments. Its simplicity comes at the cost of scalability and efficiency compared to more advanced protocols.

    When this WOULD be correct

    In a small network with simple routing requirements where ease of configuration is prioritized, and the question specifies that the protocol must be easy to implement and does not require complex metric calculations or fast convergence.

  • OSPF

    Why it's wrong here

    OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) is an open-standard link-state routing protocol that provides fast convergence and supports VLSM, making it a popular choice for large, hierarchical internal networks. Unlike EIGRP, OSPF's metric is 'cost,' which is primarily derived from interface bandwidth, where a lower cost is preferred. It does not inherently factor in delay as a default component in its metric calculation, which distinguishes its path selection from protocols that use a composite metric like EIGRP.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A question that asks for a link-state routing protocol supporting VLSM and fast convergence, without specifying a metric based on bandwidth and delay. For example: 'Which routing protocol uses Dijkstra's algorithm and supports VLSM?'

  • EIGRP

    Why this is correct

    EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol) is a sophisticated Cisco proprietary distance-vector routing protocol, often described as a hybrid, known for its rapid convergence and efficient use of network resources. It fully supports Variable Length Subnet Masks (VLSM) and calculates its composite metric using bandwidth, delay, reliability, and load, with bandwidth and delay being the default components. This allows EIGRP to make intelligent routing decisions based on actual link characteristics, making it highly suitable for internal routing within a single autonomous system.

  • BGP

    Why it's wrong here

    Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is the de facto standard exterior gateway protocol, specifically designed for routing between different autonomous systems (AS) on the internet. It is not intended for internal routing within a single organization, as its primary function is to exchange reachability information between ISPs and large enterprises. BGP's path selection is based on a complex set of path attributes, such as AS_PATH and LOCAL_PREF, rather than simple bandwidth or delay metrics, making it fundamentally different from interior gateway protocols.

    When this WOULD be correct

    BGP would be correct when connecting multiple autonomous systems, such as between an organization and its ISP, or for large-scale enterprise networks with complex routing policies that require path selection based on attributes like AS-path, local preference, and MED.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The N10-009 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

EIGRPCorrect answer

Why this is correct

EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol) is a sophisticated Cisco proprietary distance-vector routing protocol, often described as a hybrid, known for its rapid convergence and efficient use of network resources. It fully supports Variable Length Subnet Masks (VLSM) and calculates its composite metric using bandwidth, delay, reliability, and load, with bandwidth and delay being the default components. This allows EIGRP to make intelligent routing decisions based on actual link characteristics, making it highly suitable for internal routing within a single autonomous system.

RIPWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

RIP uses hop count as its metric, not bandwidth and delay, and converges slowly due to its periodic updates and hold-down timers. It also does not support VLSM in RIPv1, though RIPv2 does, but it still lacks the required metric and fast convergence.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

In a small network with simple routing requirements where ease of configuration is prioritized, and the question specifies that the protocol must be easy to implement and does not require complex metric calculations or fast convergence.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may mistakenly think RIP supports VLSM (RIPv2 does) and overlook the metric and convergence requirements, or they may confuse RIP with EIGRP due to similar acronyms or vendor association.

OSPFWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

OSPF uses cost as its metric, which is typically based on bandwidth but not delay. The question requires a metric based on both bandwidth and delay, which is a feature of EIGRP, not OSPF.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A question that asks for a link-state routing protocol supporting VLSM and fast convergence, without specifying a metric based on bandwidth and delay. For example: 'Which routing protocol uses Dijkstra's algorithm and supports VLSM?'

Why candidates choose this

OSPF is a popular dynamic routing protocol that supports VLSM and converges quickly, so candidates may overlook the specific metric requirement and choose it based on its general suitability.

BGPWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

BGP uses a path-vector algorithm with complex attributes like AS-path, not bandwidth and delay, and converges slowly, making it unsuitable for this internal routing scenario requiring fast convergence and VLSM support.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

BGP would be correct when connecting multiple autonomous systems, such as between an organization and its ISP, or for large-scale enterprise networks with complex routing policies that require path selection based on attributes like AS-path, local preference, and MED.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse BGP's ability to handle large networks and complex metrics with the question's requirement for bandwidth and delay, or mistakenly think BGP supports VLSM and fast convergence like interior protocols.

Analysis generated from the official N10-009blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Visual reference

192.168.1.0 /24 256 addresses (254 usable) 192.168.1.0 /25 Subnet A 128 addr (126 usable) 192.168.1.128 /25 Subnet B 128 addr (126 usable) Borrowing 1 bit from host portion creates 2 subnets (/25)

Quick reference

Routing Protocol Comparison

ProtocolMetricMax HopsAlgorithmType
RIP v2Hop count15Bellman-FordDistance vector
OSPFCost (bandwidth)UnlimitedDijkstra (SPF)Link state
EIGRPComposite metricUnlimitedDUALHybrid
IS-ISCostUnlimitedDijkstraLink state
BGPPolicy / attributesUnlimitedPath vectorPath vector

RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This N10-009 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the N10-009 exam.