Question 466 of 464
N10-009 Network Implementation Practice Question
A network administrator is configuring dynamic routing between two routers in the same organization. The routers must support VLSM, converge quickly, and use a metric that is based on bandwidth and delay. Which routing protocol should be configured?
⚠ Common exam trap
A common mix-up: candidates choose OSPF because it is a widely used link-state protocol that supports VLSM and converges quickly, but they overlook the specific requirement for a metric based on both bandwidth and delay, which is unique to EIGRP's default composite metric.
Answer choices
Why each option matters
Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.
Correct answer & explanation
✓
EIGRP
C is correct because EIGRP is a Cisco-proprietary hybrid routing protocol that supports Variable-Length Subnet Masking (VLSM), converges rapidly using the Diffusing Update Algorithm (DUAL), and uses a composite metric that by default includes bandwidth and delay. This makes it ideal for the scenario where both VLSM support and fast convergence are required with a metric based on bandwidth and delay.
Answer analysis
Option-by-option breakdown
For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.
- ✗
RIP
Why it's wrong here
Routing Information Protocol (RIP) is an older distance-vector protocol that uses hop count as its sole metric, severely limiting its ability to select optimal paths in complex networks. RIPv1 is classful and does not support VLSM, while RIPv2 supports VLSM but still suffers from slow convergence and a maximum hop count of 15, making it unsuitable for large or modern network environments. Its simplicity comes at the cost of scalability and efficiency compared to more advanced protocols.
When this WOULD be correct
In a small network with simple routing requirements where ease of configuration is prioritized, and the question specifies that the protocol must be easy to implement and does not require complex metric calculations or fast convergence.
- ✗
OSPF
Why it's wrong here
OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) is an open-standard link-state routing protocol that provides fast convergence and supports VLSM, making it a popular choice for large, hierarchical internal networks. Unlike EIGRP, OSPF's metric is 'cost,' which is primarily derived from interface bandwidth, where a lower cost is preferred. It does not inherently factor in delay as a default component in its metric calculation, which distinguishes its path selection from protocols that use a composite metric like EIGRP.
When this WOULD be correct
A question that asks for a link-state routing protocol supporting VLSM and fast convergence, without specifying a metric based on bandwidth and delay. For example: 'Which routing protocol uses Dijkstra's algorithm and supports VLSM?'
- ✓
EIGRP
Why this is correct
EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol) is a sophisticated Cisco proprietary distance-vector routing protocol, often described as a hybrid, known for its rapid convergence and efficient use of network resources. It fully supports Variable Length Subnet Masks (VLSM) and calculates its composite metric using bandwidth, delay, reliability, and load, with bandwidth and delay being the default components. This allows EIGRP to make intelligent routing decisions based on actual link characteristics, making it highly suitable for internal routing within a single autonomous system.
- ✗
BGP
Why it's wrong here
Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is the de facto standard exterior gateway protocol, specifically designed for routing between different autonomous systems (AS) on the internet. It is not intended for internal routing within a single organization, as its primary function is to exchange reachability information between ISPs and large enterprises. BGP's path selection is based on a complex set of path attributes, such as AS_PATH and LOCAL_PREF, rather than simple bandwidth or delay metrics, making it fundamentally different from interior gateway protocols.
When this WOULD be correct
BGP would be correct when connecting multiple autonomous systems, such as between an organization and its ISP, or for large-scale enterprise networks with complex routing policies that require path selection based on attributes like AS-path, local preference, and MED.
Option-by-option analysis
Why each answer is right or wrong
Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The N10-009 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.
✓EIGRPCorrect answer▾
Why this is correct
EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol) is a sophisticated Cisco proprietary distance-vector routing protocol, often described as a hybrid, known for its rapid convergence and efficient use of network resources. It fully supports Variable Length Subnet Masks (VLSM) and calculates its composite metric using bandwidth, delay, reliability, and load, with bandwidth and delay being the default components. This allows EIGRP to make intelligent routing decisions based on actual link characteristics, making it highly suitable for internal routing within a single autonomous system.
✗RIPWrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
RIP uses hop count as its metric, not bandwidth and delay, and converges slowly due to its periodic updates and hold-down timers. It also does not support VLSM in RIPv1, though RIPv2 does, but it still lacks the required metric and fast convergence.
★ When this WOULD be the correct answer
In a small network with simple routing requirements where ease of configuration is prioritized, and the question specifies that the protocol must be easy to implement and does not require complex metric calculations or fast convergence.
Why candidates choose this
Candidates may mistakenly think RIP supports VLSM (RIPv2 does) and overlook the metric and convergence requirements, or they may confuse RIP with EIGRP due to similar acronyms or vendor association.
✗OSPFWrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
OSPF uses cost as its metric, which is typically based on bandwidth but not delay. The question requires a metric based on both bandwidth and delay, which is a feature of EIGRP, not OSPF.
★ When this WOULD be the correct answer
A question that asks for a link-state routing protocol supporting VLSM and fast convergence, without specifying a metric based on bandwidth and delay. For example: 'Which routing protocol uses Dijkstra's algorithm and supports VLSM?'
Why candidates choose this
OSPF is a popular dynamic routing protocol that supports VLSM and converges quickly, so candidates may overlook the specific metric requirement and choose it based on its general suitability.
✗BGPWrong answer — click to see why▾
Why this is wrong here
BGP uses a path-vector algorithm with complex attributes like AS-path, not bandwidth and delay, and converges slowly, making it unsuitable for this internal routing scenario requiring fast convergence and VLSM support.
★ When this WOULD be the correct answer
BGP would be correct when connecting multiple autonomous systems, such as between an organization and its ISP, or for large-scale enterprise networks with complex routing policies that require path selection based on attributes like AS-path, local preference, and MED.
Why candidates choose this
Candidates may confuse BGP's ability to handle large networks and complex metrics with the question's requirement for bandwidth and delay, or mistakenly think BGP supports VLSM and fast convergence like interior protocols.
Analysis generated from the official N10-009blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”
Visual reference
Quick reference
Routing Protocol Comparison
| Protocol | Metric | Max Hops | Algorithm | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIP v2 | Hop count | 15 | Bellman-Ford | Distance vector |
| OSPF | Cost (bandwidth) | Unlimited | Dijkstra (SPF) | Link state |
| EIGRP | Composite metric | Unlimited | DUAL | Hybrid |
| IS-IS | Cost | Unlimited | Dijkstra | Link state |
| BGP | Policy / attributes | Unlimited | Path vector | Path vector |
RIP's 15-hop limit makes it unsuitable for large networks. OSPF and EIGRP dominate modern enterprise deployments.
About these practice questions
Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →
Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026
This N10-009 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the N10-009 exam.
Question Discussion
Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.
Sign in to join the discussion.