Courseiva
Network SecurityhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

N10-009 Network Security Practice Question

An attacker sends ICMP echo request packets to the broadcast address of a network, with the source IP address spoofed to be the target's IP address. This causes all hosts on the network to send ICMP echo replies to the target, overwhelming it. Which type of attack is this?

⚠ Common exam trap

CompTIA often tests the distinction between Smurf (ICMP) and Fraggle (UDP) attacks, so candidates mistakenly choose Fraggle when they see 'broadcast' and 'spoofed source' without noting the protocol used.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

Smurf attack

This is a classic Smurf attack, which exploits ICMP by sending echo request packets to the network's broadcast address with the source IP spoofed as the target. All hosts on the network receive the request and reply to the spoofed source, flooding the target with ICMP echo replies and consuming its bandwidth or resources.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • Smurf attack

    Why this is correct

    A Smurf attack is a classic distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) technique that leverages ICMP echo requests. The attacker sends these requests to a network's broadcast address, but with the source IP address spoofed to that of the intended victim. Every host on the target network that receives the broadcast then replies to the spoofed source IP, overwhelming the victim with a flood of ICMP echo replies.

  • Fraggle attack

    Why it's wrong here

    A Fraggle attack is a variant of the Smurf attack, distinguished by its use of UDP echo packets, typically targeting port 7 (echo) or port 19 (chargen), instead of ICMP. Similar to Smurf, the attacker sends UDP packets to a network's broadcast address with a spoofed source IP belonging to the victim. This causes all responsive hosts on the network to send UDP replies back to the victim, creating a denial-of-service condition through amplification.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A question describing an attacker sending spoofed UDP packets to the broadcast address, causing hosts to reply to the target, would have Fraggle as the correct answer.

  • Ping flood

    Why it's wrong here

    A ping flood is a straightforward denial-of-service (DoS) attack that involves overwhelming a target system with a massive volume of ICMP echo request packets. Unlike amplification attacks, a ping flood does not rely on spoofing a source IP to a broadcast address for amplification. Instead, the attacker directly sends a continuous stream of ICMP packets to the victim, aiming to consume all available bandwidth or exhaust the target's processing resources.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A ping flood would be correct if the question described an attacker sending a large number of ICMP echo requests directly to a target host from a single source (or multiple sources without amplification), overwhelming its network bandwidth or processing capacity.

  • ARP poisoning

    Why it's wrong here

    ARP poisoning, or ARP spoofing, is a Layer 2 attack where an attacker sends forged Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) messages onto a local area network. The goal is to associate the attacker's MAC address with the IP address of another host, such as the default gateway or another client. This manipulation allows the attacker to intercept, modify, or stop traffic between the legitimate devices, facilitating man-in-the-middle attacks rather than network-wide floods.

    When this WOULD be correct

    An exam question describing an attacker sending forged ARP replies to associate their MAC address with the default gateway's IP, causing traffic interception or man-in-the-middle attacks.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The N10-009 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

Smurf attackCorrect answer

Why this is correct

A Smurf attack is a classic distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) technique that leverages ICMP echo requests. The attacker sends these requests to a network's broadcast address, but with the source IP address spoofed to that of the intended victim. Every host on the target network that receives the broadcast then replies to the spoofed source IP, overwhelming the victim with a flood of ICMP echo replies.

Fraggle attackWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

The Fraggle attack uses UDP echo packets (typically to port 7 or 19) instead of ICMP echo requests, so the description of ICMP packets makes this incorrect.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A question describing an attacker sending spoofed UDP packets to the broadcast address, causing hosts to reply to the target, would have Fraggle as the correct answer.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse Smurf (ICMP) and Fraggle (UDP) because both are broadcast amplification attacks with similar mechanisms.

Ping floodWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

A ping flood typically involves sending a high volume of ICMP echo request packets directly to a single target, not using a broadcast address to amplify traffic from multiple hosts.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A ping flood would be correct if the question described an attacker sending a large number of ICMP echo requests directly to a target host from a single source (or multiple sources without amplification), overwhelming its network bandwidth or processing capacity.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse the use of ICMP echo requests in both attacks, and the term 'flood' suggests overwhelming traffic, but they miss the amplification mechanism via broadcast address that distinguishes a smurf attack.

ARP poisoningWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

ARP poisoning involves manipulating ARP tables to intercept traffic, not flooding a target with ICMP replies via broadcast amplification.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

An exam question describing an attacker sending forged ARP replies to associate their MAC address with the default gateway's IP, causing traffic interception or man-in-the-middle attacks.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse network-layer attacks, thinking ARP poisoning can also cause denial of service by flooding, but it primarily targets data interception.

Analysis generated from the official N10-009blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Quick reference

IPv4 Address Class Summary

ClassFirst Octet RangeDefault MaskNetworksHosts per Network
A1–126/8 (255.0.0.0)12616,777,214
B128–191/16 (255.255.0.0)16,38465,534
C192–223/24 (255.255.255.0)2,097,152254
D224–239N/AMulticast groups
E240–255N/AReserved / experimental

127.x.x.x is reserved for loopback. Modern networks use CIDR (classless) rather than classful addressing.

About these practice questions

This N10-009 question is part of Courseiva's 464-question bank — original exam-style content with full explanations and wrong-answer analysis, never real exam questions or exam dumps. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This N10-009 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the N10-009 exam.