Question 124 of 520
Network SecurityhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

N10-009 Network Security Practice Question

This N10-009 practice question tests your understanding of network security. Read the scenario carefully and evaluate each option against the stated constraints before committing to an answer. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A security analyst is reviewing DHCP server logs and notices that a single MAC address is sending an extremely high number of DHCP discover packets. The DHCP server is responding, but the client never sends a DHCP request. Which type of attack is most likely occurring?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "most likely"

    Why it matters: Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

  • Clue: "never"

    Why it matters: Absolute qualifier. True only if the statement has zero exceptions — be cautious of options that seem obvious but break down in edge cases.

Question 1hardmultiple choice
Read the full DHCP explanation →

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

A) DHCP starvation

A DHCP starvation attack works by flooding the DHCP server with DHCPDISCOVER packets from spoofed MAC addresses, exhausting the server's IP address pool. In this scenario, a single MAC address sending excessive DHCPDISCOVER packets without completing the DORA handshake (no DHCPREQUEST) is a classic indicator of a starvation attack, as the attacker aims to consume all available leases and cause a denial of service for legitimate clients.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • A) DHCP starvation

    Why this is correct

    Correct. This is a classic DHCP starvation attack, where the attacker sends many DHCP discovers to deplete the IP pool.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue words "most likely", "never" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • B) ARP poisoning

    Why it's wrong here

    ARP poisoning involves sending forged ARP replies to associate a MAC address with a different IP, not DHCP discovers.

  • C) MAC flooding

    Why it's wrong here

    MAC flooding aims to overflow the switch's MAC address table with fake MAC addresses, causing the switch to act like a hub.

  • D) DNS spoofing

    Why it's wrong here

    DNS spoofing corrupts DNS responses to redirect users to malicious sites, unrelated to DHCP.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is confusing DHCP starvation with MAC flooding, as both involve 'flooding' and MAC addresses, but MAC flooding targets switch CAM tables at Layer 2, while DHCP starvation targets the DHCP server at Layer 7 (application layer) using DHCP protocol messages.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

DHCP starvation exploits the fact that DHCP servers allocate leases based on the client identifier (typically the MAC address) in the DHCPDISCOVER message. An attacker can use tools like 'yersinia' or 'dhcpstarv' to rapidly generate DHCPDISCOVER packets with randomized MAC addresses, causing the server to reserve IP addresses for nonexistent clients. Once the pool is exhausted, legitimate clients receive DHCPNAK messages and cannot obtain an IP address, effectively creating a denial-of-service condition on the network.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the N10-009 exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related N10-009 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free N10-009 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this N10-009 question test?

Network Security — This question tests Network Security — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: A) DHCP starvation — A DHCP starvation attack works by flooding the DHCP server with DHCPDISCOVER packets from spoofed MAC addresses, exhausting the server's IP address pool. In this scenario, a single MAC address sending excessive DHCPDISCOVER packets without completing the DORA handshake (no DHCPREQUEST) is a classic indicator of a starvation attack, as the attacker aims to consume all available leases and cause a denial of service for legitimate clients.

What should I do if I get this N10-009 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "most likely", "never". Probability qualifier — the question wants the most probable cause or outcome, not a guaranteed one. Eliminate low-probability options.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jun 11, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This N10-009 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the N10-009 exam.