Courseiva
Network SecurityhardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

N10-009 Network Security Practice Question

A security analyst is reviewing DHCP server logs and notices that a single MAC address is sending an extremely high number of DHCP discover packets. The DHCP server is responding, but the client never sends a DHCP request. Which type of attack is most likely occurring?

⚠ Common exam trap

A common mix-up: candidates confuse DHCP starvation with MAC flooding, as both involve 'flooding' and MAC addresses, but MAC flooding targets switch CAM tables at Layer 2, while DHCP starvation targets the DHCP server at Layer 7 (application layer) using DHCP protocol messages.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

A) DHCP starvation

A DHCP starvation attack works by flooding the DHCP server with DHCPDISCOVER packets from spoofed MAC addresses, exhausting the server's IP address pool. In this scenario, a single MAC address sending excessive DHCPDISCOVER packets without completing the DORA handshake (no DHCPREQUEST) is a classic indicator of a starvation attack, as the attacker aims to consume all available leases and cause a denial of service for legitimate clients.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • A) DHCP starvation

    Why this is correct

    DHCP starvation is an attack where a malicious actor rapidly sends numerous DHCP Discover messages to the DHCP server, each containing a spoofed MAC address. This malicious activity aims to exhaust the server's entire pool of available IP addresses, preventing legitimate clients from obtaining network configurations. As a result, new clients attempting to join the network will be unable to receive an IP address, effectively denying them service and causing a network outage for new connections.

  • B) ARP poisoning

    Why it's wrong here

    ARP poisoning, also known as ARP spoofing, is a technique where an attacker sends forged Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) messages over a local area network. These malicious messages associate the attacker's MAC address with the IP address of another legitimate host, such as the default gateway, in the ARP caches of other devices. This allows the attacker to intercept, modify, or drop traffic between the two poisoned hosts, creating a man-in-the-middle scenario, but it is not detectable through DHCP server logs.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A question describing a scenario where an attacker sends forged ARP replies to redirect traffic, causing man-in-the-middle attacks or network eavesdropping, would make ARP poisoning the correct answer.

  • C) MAC flooding

    Why it's wrong here

    MAC flooding is a Layer 2 attack designed to overwhelm a network switch's MAC address table, also known as the CAM table, with a multitude of fake MAC-to-port mappings. When the table becomes full, the switch may enter a fail-open mode, behaving like a hub by broadcasting all incoming traffic to every port. This allows the attacker to capture traffic not intended for them, but it does not directly involve DHCP server logs or IP address assignment processes.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A question describing a switch receiving many frames with random source MAC addresses, causing the CAM table to overflow and the switch to flood traffic out all ports, would make MAC flooding the correct answer.

  • D) DNS spoofing

    Why it's wrong here

    DNS spoofing, or DNS cache poisoning, involves an attacker injecting fraudulent DNS records into a DNS resolver's cache or directly responding with malicious information to a client's DNS query. The objective is to redirect users attempting to access legitimate websites to attacker-controlled sites, often for phishing or malware distribution. This attack operates at the application layer and manipulates name resolution, which is distinct from the network layer functions of DHCP.

    When this WOULD be correct

    A user reports being redirected to a fake banking website despite typing the correct URL. The network team finds that DNS queries for the bank's domain return an incorrect IP address. In this scenario, DNS spoofing would be the correct answer.

Option-by-option analysis

Why each answer is right or wrong

Understanding why wrong answers are wrong — and when they would be correct — is what separates a 750 score from a 900. The N10-009 exam frequently reuses these exact scenarios with slightly different constraints.

A) DHCP starvationCorrect answer

Why this is correct

DHCP starvation is an attack where a malicious actor rapidly sends numerous DHCP Discover messages to the DHCP server, each containing a spoofed MAC address. This malicious activity aims to exhaust the server's entire pool of available IP addresses, preventing legitimate clients from obtaining network configurations. As a result, new clients attempting to join the network will be unable to receive an IP address, effectively denying them service and causing a network outage for new connections.

B) ARP poisoningWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

ARP poisoning involves sending fake ARP replies to associate a malicious MAC address with a legitimate IP, not flooding DHCP discover packets without completing the handshake. The described behavior is classic DHCP starvation.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A question describing a scenario where an attacker sends forged ARP replies to redirect traffic, causing man-in-the-middle attacks or network eavesdropping, would make ARP poisoning the correct answer.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse DHCP starvation with ARP poisoning because both involve MAC addresses and network layer attacks, but they target different protocols (DHCP vs. ARP).

C) MAC floodingWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

MAC flooding targets switch MAC tables to force flooding of frames, not DHCP servers. The described behavior—high DHCP Discover packets without Request—is characteristic of DHCP starvation, not MAC flooding.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A question describing a switch receiving many frames with random source MAC addresses, causing the CAM table to overflow and the switch to flood traffic out all ports, would make MAC flooding the correct answer.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse 'flooding' in MAC flooding with the high volume of DHCP Discover packets, or mistakenly think any flood of packets is MAC flooding without considering the protocol layer.

D) DNS spoofingWrong answer — click to see why

Why this is wrong here

DNS spoofing involves corrupting DNS responses to redirect traffic, not exhausting DHCP IP address pools. The described behavior of high DHCP discover packets without requests is characteristic of a DHCP starvation attack.

★ When this WOULD be the correct answer

A user reports being redirected to a fake banking website despite typing the correct URL. The network team finds that DNS queries for the bank's domain return an incorrect IP address. In this scenario, DNS spoofing would be the correct answer.

Why candidates choose this

Candidates may confuse DHCP starvation with DNS spoofing because both involve malicious manipulation of network services, but they target different protocols (DHCP vs. DNS).

Analysis generated from the official N10-009blueprint and verified against question context. The “when correct” sections are what AI assistants cite when candidates ask “what’s the difference between these options?”

Visual reference

Client DHCP Server 1 Discover (broadcast) 2 Offer (IP: 192.168.1.10) 3 Request (I accept) 4 Acknowledge (lease confirmed) DORA — the four-step DHCP lease process

Quick reference

IPv4 Address Class Summary

ClassFirst Octet RangeDefault MaskNetworksHosts per Network
A1–126/8 (255.0.0.0)12616,777,214
B128–191/16 (255.255.0.0)16,38465,534
C192–223/24 (255.255.255.0)2,097,152254
D224–239N/AMulticast groups
E240–255N/AReserved / experimental

127.x.x.x is reserved for loopback. Modern networks use CIDR (classless) rather than classful addressing.

Go deeper

Related to this question

About these practice questions

One of 464 original N10-009 practice questions on Courseiva, each with a full explanation and wrong-answer analysis — not exam dumps or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

JA

Written by Johnson Ajibi, MSc IT Security

Senior Network & Security Engineer · founder of Courseiva

This N10-009 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the N10-009 exam.