Question 854 of 1,000
Data Concepts and EnvironmentshardMultiple ChoiceObjective-mapped

DA0-001 Data Concepts and Environments Practice Question

This DA0-001 practice question tests your understanding of data concepts and environments. The scenario asks you to isolate a root cause — eliminate options that address a different problem before choosing. After answering, compare your reasoning against the explanation and wrong-answer breakdown below. Once you have made your selection, read the full explanation to reinforce the concept and understand why each distractor is designed to mislead on exam day.

A database has a table that violates 2NF because it contains a composite primary key and some attributes depend only on part of that key. Which normal form would be violated next if the table is not addressed?

Clue words in this question

Noticing these words before you look at the options changes how you read each choice.

  • Clue: "primary"

    Why it matters: Asks for the main purpose or function, not a secondary benefit. Eliminate answers that describe side-effects or partial functions.

Answer choices

Why each option matters

Answer the question above first, then reveal the full breakdown to understand why each option is right or wrong.

Correct answer & explanation

2NF

The table already violates 2NF because it has a composite primary key and some attributes depend only on part of that key. If this violation is not addressed, the next normal form that would be violated is 3NF, because 3NF requires that the table be in 2NF and that no transitive dependencies exist. Since 2NF is not satisfied, the table cannot meet the prerequisites for 3NF, making 3NF the next violated normal form.

Key principle: Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

  • 2NF

    Why this is correct

    2NF is violated by partial dependencies on a composite key.

    Clue confirmation

    The clue word "primary" in the question point toward this answer.

    Related concept

    Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

  • BCNF

    Why it's wrong here

    BCNF is a stronger form than 3NF.

  • 3NF

    Why it's wrong here

    3NF deals with transitive dependencies, which come after 2NF.

  • 1NF

    Why it's wrong here

    1NF is satisfied if atomic values exist.

Common exam traps

Common exam trap: answer the scenario, not the keyword

The trap here is that candidates see 'violates 2NF' and assume the answer must be 2NF, but the question asks which normal form would be violated next, which is 3NF, not 2NF.

Detailed technical explanation

How to think about this question

Normalization proceeds sequentially: a table must satisfy 1NF before 2NF, 2NF before 3NF, and 3NF before BCNF. In this scenario, the table already fails 2NF due to partial dependencies on a composite key, so it cannot be in 2NF. The next normal form that would be violated is 3NF, because 3NF requires 2NF as a prerequisite. A real-world example is an order table with columns (OrderID, ProductID, CustomerName, ProductName) where CustomerName depends only on OrderID (partial dependency) and ProductName depends only on ProductID (partial dependency), violating 2NF; if left unnormalized, transitive dependencies like CustomerName -> CustomerCity would violate 3NF.

KKey Concepts to Remember

  • Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.
  • Find the constraint that changes the correct option.
  • Eliminate answers that are true in general but not in this case.

TExam Day Tips

  • Watch for words such as best, first, most likely and least administrative effort.
  • Review why wrong options are wrong, not only why the correct option is correct.

Key takeaway

Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option.

Real-world example

How this comes up in practice

A practitioner preparing for the DA0-001 exam encounters this exact type of scenario on the job. The correct answer here is not the most general option — it is the best answer for the specific constraint described. Answer the scenario, not the keyword: identify the specific constraint before choosing the most familiar-sounding option. Real exam questions reward reading the full scenario before eliminating options, because the constraint defines which answer fits.

What to study next

Got this wrong? Here's your next step.

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Related practice questions

Related DA0-001 practice-question pages

Use these pages to review the topic behind this question. This is how one missed question becomes focused revision.

Practice this exam

Start a free DA0-001 practice session

Short sessions build daily habit. Longer sessions build exam-day stamina. Try a timed session to simulate real conditions.

FAQ

Questions learners often ask

What does this DA0-001 question test?

Data Concepts and Environments — This question tests Data Concepts and Environments — Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer..

What is the correct answer to this question?

The correct answer is: 2NF — The table already violates 2NF because it has a composite primary key and some attributes depend only on part of that key. If this violation is not addressed, the next normal form that would be violated is 3NF, because 3NF requires that the table be in 2NF and that no transitive dependencies exist. Since 2NF is not satisfied, the table cannot meet the prerequisites for 3NF, making 3NF the next violated normal form.

What should I do if I get this DA0-001 question wrong?

Identify which exam domain this question belongs to, review the core concept, then practise similar questions from the same domain.

Are there clue words in this question I should notice?

Yes — watch for: "primary". Asks for the main purpose or function, not a secondary benefit. Eliminate answers that describe side-effects or partial functions.

What is the key concept behind this question?

Read the scenario before looking for a memorised answer.

About these practice questions

Courseiva creates original exam-style practice questions with explanations and wrong-answer analysis. It does not publish real exam questions, exam dumps, or protected exam content. Learn why practice questions differ from exam dumps →

How Courseiva writes practice questions · Editorial policy

Last reviewed: Jul 4, 2026

Question Discussion

Share a tip, memory trick, or ask about the reasoning behind this question. Do not post real exam questions, leaked content, braindumps, or copyrighted exam material. Comments are moderated and may be removed without notice.

Loading comments…

Sign in to join the discussion.

This DA0-001 practice question is part of Courseiva's free CompTIA certification practice question bank. Courseiva provides original exam-style practice questions with explanations, topic-based practice, mock exams, readiness tracking, and study analytics to help learners prepare for the DA0-001 exam.