220-1102 Practice Question: A technician discovers that a user has been…

Answer analysis

Option-by-option breakdown

For each option: why learners choose it and why it is or isn't the right answer here.

• ✗

  Disable the user's account and create a generic shared account for the drive.

  Why it's wrong here

  Creating a generic shared account is a significant security vulnerability. It eliminates individual accountability, making it impossible to audit who performed specific actions on the shared drive, as all activity appears to originate from the same generic user. This practice also violates the principle of least privilege and encourages further insecure sharing behaviors, undermining the organization's security posture.

• ✗

  Implement a Group Policy that forces password changes every 30 days.

  Why it's wrong here

  While frequent password changes are a common security practice, implementing a Group Policy for 30-day password changes does not directly resolve the issue of unauthorized password sharing for shared drive access. Users may still share passwords, or it could even exacerbate the problem by making legitimate access more cumbersome, prompting users to seek workarounds rather than addressing the fundamental need for proper access provisioning. This approach fails to provide a secure, auditable method for collaborative work.

• ✓

  Configure the shared drive permissions using security groups and add the coworkers to the appropriate group.

  Why this is correct

  Configuring shared drive permissions using security groups is the most appropriate and secure solution. This method allows the technician to grant specific access levels (e.g., read, write) to defined groups of users, ensuring that only authorized personnel can access the drive without sharing individual credentials. It enforces the principle of least privilege, maintains individual accountability for actions, and simplifies management by centralizing access control, directly addressing the need for shared access securely.

• ✗

  Send a company-wide email reminding users not to share passwords.

  Why it's wrong here

  Sending a company-wide email is a reactive and largely ineffective measure to prevent unauthorized password sharing in the long term. While user education on security policies is crucial, it does not provide a technical control to prevent the behavior or address the underlying operational need that led to the sharing. Without implementing proper access management solutions, users will likely continue to find workarounds, rendering the email reminder insufficient to secure shared resources.

Go deeper

Related to this question